Cac, be silent.Wack. She could handle herself.
ruined the moment, breh was making that answer mad dramatic
overbearing and protective father though, you know where they got with that![]()
Wack. She could handle herself.
sorry, I'm not blackBe fatherless brehs

sorry, I'm not black
is that what you wanted![]()
His post would still have validity, fakkit. Hold this negsorry, I'm not black
is that what you wanted![]()

why do yall love saying that shyt?
You shyt on people who cant help their situation to praise someone?
You claim to "get it" because you have a father...but what did your dad do that makes you so special?
Richard is that dude because he instilled a work ethic in his girls...instead of complaining, they just beat everyone because of the work they put in.
The fukk are you doing that makes you better than these "fatherless nikkas"?
Tell em'...tell em'...Why are you taking this out of context?
It's not the greatest example, nor is it even a good example. White folk finding fault in him saying that he 'expects' to be a top 5 qb is more the fact he's wack, than he's black. I'm by no means saying he shouldn't have those expectations, but it's disingenuous to think white folk are shytting on him for having that goal, and putting it down mostly to him being black.


Cotdam nikka shut the fukk up. Ok u dont like the example. writing essays like nikkas give a fukk.smh smart dumb nikka.
Point blank the nikka stepped up as a father. Shouts to him
Nobody wanna hear ya wack analogies dog
"Hey I dont like that example" foh![]()

The difference between him and the Coli Militant is that he put his all into that shyt.Richard guided, sacrificed, invested and obsessed over his children's life. That is why they are successful. The overbearing tendency he shows in OP's video is likely symptomatic of Richard's care. As for your saying Richard never "complained", what didn't he complain about and what proof do you have he never complained? I think I get what you are trying to say (talking about racism?), and if so, your assertion is a classic example of overreach.
Richard has commented on racism throughout his life and with respects to his daughters on several occasions (including one I will later quote him on). It is cac's opinion that blacks whom complain about racism can't or never succeed; that view is simplistic, wrong and self-serving. Cacs don't like blacks who "complain about racism" so they often try to link Tomness to what they think are "positive" things to reinforce thd idea. It is too bad that in fact Richard writes about racism in his new book and that black success has nothing here or there to do with not liking cacs. Any success (chess, sport, academic) is founded onwork ethic, devotion and perseverance in a task, not on cacs. This is what Richard had to say about cacs and racism on the Howard Stern show (and in his new book):
Howard: I was reading the book....Do you hate white people as a result of the way you were treated, they've been terrible to you
.
Richard: They have been more than terrible. They've been dogs...hell...the devil and everything, but I don't hate anyone.
--
Tell em'...tell em'...
How does it defeat the purpose? In get it. At some point, a black athlete is no longer supposed to have aspirations
It was an asinine example, and it defeats the purpose of the argument. This would have been all avoided if dudes stop digging holes for themselves and admit they were wrong.