Video of Michael Johnson analyzing Usain Bolt's running - Edit - Worlds going on now

LezJepzin

We Wavy
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,946
Reputation
5,818
Daps
87,946
Reppin
50East/Sacramento, CA
I lost a lot of respect for Michael Johnson when he tried to slander Bolt after Beijing and the bullshyt he's got himself into since that 200m final in Atlanta :dame:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,458
Reputation
-609
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
as someone who grew up in a family with livestock, you don't need "science" or any genetic education to know you have a good bull who will produce better calves than this other lesser bull, put it with a good heifer and the rest is clockwork. All you need is eyes and experience dealing with cattle.

We are human, but it's still genetics no different than animals....which we were viewed us.

And plus how do you think the thousands of difference types of domestics dogs, cats, chickens, horses, cattle came into existence? People were cross-breeding and customizing animals in ways thousands of years ago in ways we can't even figure out today. They knew how to breed a bird down to getting a single color feather different from the rest of the feathers.

You are completely wrong, even with your livestock experience. The reason why you cannot ignore the importance of science and genetics is because there are certain characteristics that needs to be emphasize artificially because nature don't deem it necessary for survival, thus it won't emphasize it. That is why you will never get a thoroughbred horse naturally produced in nature

That is why science produced certain hormones to inject into livestock and their food for certain desired results that nature wouldn't emphazie

-Don't over simplify breeding inorder to push an agenda like superhuman negros. You probably one of those same nikkas who blindly support and promote DNA ancestry tree reconstruction as a viable peek into your past, while ignoring key details of the process, results, and how those results are read and interpreted
-Don't ignore the fail cross breeding, offsprings with poor health, especially dogs and cats, and extinction of "new species" by crossbreeding due to their inability to adapt and survive

What skills from picking cotton, eating poor food, having poor education, and being emotional and physically tortured contributes to some of the dominant athletes of today? what about those non-black athletes who dominate certain sports, whose ancestors did not experience the same "training" from slavery?
Humans, like animals, nature will only emphasize what is necessary for survival. But because humans embraced science, they were able to "overcome" some of the limits of nature
 

Heretic

GOLDGANG...
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
24,779
Reputation
7,337
Daps
71,361
Reppin
Alabama
You are completely wrong, even with your livestock experience. The reason why you cannot ignore the importance of science and genetics is because there are certain characteristics that needs to be emphasize artificially because nature don't deem it necessary for survival, thus it won't emphasize it. That is why you will never get a thoroughbred horse naturally produced in nature

That is why science produced certain hormones to inject into livestock and their food for certain desired results that nature wouldn't emphazie

-Don't over simplify breeding inorder to push an agenda like superhuman negros. You probably one of those same nikkas who blindly support and promote DNA ancestry tree reconstruction as a viable peek into your past, while ignoring key details of the process, results, and how those results are read and interpreted
-Don't ignore the fail cross breeding, offsprings with poor health, especially dogs and cats, and extinction of "new species" by crossbreeding due to their inability to adapt and survive

What skills from picking cotton, eating poor food, having poor education, and being emotional and physically tortured contributes to some of the dominant athletes of today? what about those non-black athletes who dominate certain sports, whose ancestors did not experience the same "training" from slavery?
Humans, like animals, nature will only emphasize what is necessary for survival. But because humans embraced science, they were able to "overcome" some of the limits of nature


Honestly breh, black American athletes are just in another class from anyone else and there's an underlying reason for that... There's a reason why they weren't allowed to compete along side their white counterparts for so long. It's a sick reality but I can't help but think that there's something to what others have said in this thread but like @Raul said, that's a whole other thread to itself.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,458
Reputation
-609
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
Honestly breh, black American athletes are just in another class from anyone else and there's an underlying reason for that... There's a reason why they weren't allowed to compete along side their white counterparts for so long. It's a sick reality but I can't help but think that there's something to what others have said in this thread but like @Raul said, that's a whole other thread to itself.
Breh, I understand that but I can't allow false information and confusion to nonchalantly be passed about, while suggesting that this discussion deserves a thread of its own
All I ask is for proof. If all you gonna say is take a look at certain sports, and ignore other sports, then you cherry picking facts for what you want to believe in
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
85,022
Reputation
26,392
Daps
380,061
http://olympictalk.nbcsports.com/20...world-championships-100-meters-heats-beijing/



Usain Bolt and Justin Gatlin took their first strides toward a 100m final showdown at the World Championships in Beijing, easily winning their heats Saturday to reach Sunday’s semifinals.

Great Britain’s Mo Farah won his second straight 10,000m World title. Michelle Carter captured bronze in the shot put for the first U.S. medal on the opening day of the meet.

Bolt won his opening round sprint in 9.96 seconds, easing up as he crossed the finish line. Earlier, Gatlin took his heat in 9.83 seconds, relaxing through the finish (full Saturday results here).

“Overall, it was good, I didn’t really use much stress,” Bolt said on the BBC, adding later that he’s definitely in the physical shape to run 9.6 seconds.

Bolt, whose world record from 2009 is 9.58, appears beatable after dealing with injuries since the start of 2013. His best time since September 2013 is 9.87 seconds. Bolt’s only defeat in five career Olympic/World Championships 100m was in 2011, when he was disqualified for a false start in the final.

Gatlin, five years removed from a four-year doping ban, has run 9.80 or faster six times since the start of 2013. No other man in the world has clocked 9.80 or faster once in that span.

“My coach said go out there, execute the first 40, 45 meters,” Gatlin told media in Beijing. “That’s what I did. After that, he literally says go out there and do what you want to do.”

Bolt and Gatlin will next race in the semifinals Sunday (7:10 a.m. ET) and, if they advance, the eight-man final later Sunday (9:15 a.m.). The other top medal contenders — Jamaican Asafa Powell, American record holder Tyson Gay and rising Baylor junior Trayvon Bromell— also advanced in 9.95, 10.11 and 9.91, respectively. Gay said he’s had hip issues since his last race in Monaco on July 17.

NBC and NBC Sports Live Extra will have World Championships coverage Saturday from 3-4:30 p.m. ET and on Sunday from 1-2:30 p.m. ET.

 
Top