I lost a lot of respect for Michael Johnson when he tried to slander Bolt after Beijing and the bullshyt he's got himself into since that 200m final in Atlanta 


as someone who grew up in a family with livestock, you don't need "science" or any genetic education to know you have a good bull who will produce better calves than this other lesser bull, put it with a good heifer and the rest is clockwork. All you need is eyes and experience dealing with cattle.
We are human, but it's still genetics no different than animals....which we were viewed us.
And plus how do you think the thousands of difference types of domestics dogs, cats, chickens, horses, cattle came into existence? People were cross-breeding and customizing animals in ways thousands of years ago in ways we can't even figure out today. They knew how to breed a bird down to getting a single color feather different from the rest of the feathers.
You are completely wrong, even with your livestock experience. The reason why you cannot ignore the importance of science and genetics is because there are certain characteristics that needs to be emphasize artificially because nature don't deem it necessary for survival, thus it won't emphasize it. That is why you will never get a thoroughbred horse naturally produced in nature
That is why science produced certain hormones to inject into livestock and their food for certain desired results that nature wouldn't emphazie
-Don't over simplify breeding inorder to push an agenda like superhuman negros. You probably one of those same nikkas who blindly support and promote DNA ancestry tree reconstruction as a viable peek into your past, while ignoring key details of the process, results, and how those results are read and interpreted
-Don't ignore the fail cross breeding, offsprings with poor health, especially dogs and cats, and extinction of "new species" by crossbreeding due to their inability to adapt and survive
What skills from picking cotton, eating poor food, having poor education, and being emotional and physically tortured contributes to some of the dominant athletes of today? what about those non-black athletes who dominate certain sports, whose ancestors did not experience the same "training" from slavery?
Humans, like animals, nature will only emphasize what is necessary for survival. But because humans embraced science, they were able to "overcome" some of the limits of nature
Breh, I understand that but I can't allow false information and confusion to nonchalantly be passed about, while suggesting that this discussion deserves a thread of its ownHonestly breh, black American athletes are just in another class from anyone else and there's an underlying reason for that... There's a reason why they weren't allowed to compete along side their white counterparts for so long. It's a sick reality but I can't help but think that there's something to what others have said in this thread but like @Raul said, that's a whole other thread to itself.