Video: Peep Googles "Project Wing" Delivery Drones

JordanWearinThe45

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
46,047
Reputation
16,685
Daps
174,190

Amazon is selling a phone and reportedly even getting into the online ad business, so of course Google is ready to compete with its still-in-testing Prime Air drone delivery service. The Atlantic has a report on what is being called "Project Wing," a part of the Google X labs that have worked on Project Loon, Glass, driverless cars and so much more. As shown above, the idea is for a tail sitter unmanned aircraft (shown above, described as a hybrid between a plane and a helicopter that takes off and lands vertically), where the drone flies in like a plane, then hovers and lowers a package to the ground by wire before releasing it. The "egg" at the end of the wire hits the ground and drops the package before being pulled back up into the drone. So can you expect to receive a Google Shopping Express order this way anytime soon? Probably not right away, as the test shown took place in Australia, and there's plenty of testing and regulatory hurdles to get over before anyone is dropping off packages this way. If you're an interested partner (hey Netflix, maybe drones aren't a joke?) there's a sign-up sheet available.

http://www.engadget.com/2014/08/28/google-x-project-wing/
:ohlawd: fukk usps, fed ex, & UPS. bytches knock once & run back to the truck w/ my shyt, throw packages... fukkem :pacspit:
 

Camammal

Half Man Half Mammal
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
6,785
Reputation
1,668
Daps
19,065
Reppin
Marcy
soo whats the weight limit? because the shyt i want delivered outside of video game disc probably gonna be too big for it making it absolutely useless
 

Yuzo

No nice guys in boxing
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
2,675
Reputation
1,430
Daps
7,266
recently saw a video of a fully automated shipping warehouse operated by robots. work 24 hours a day, dont get sick, work for 0 wages. thats going to be the unavoidable future with that. now theres a slight bottleneck that if they can automate their delivery process they could therefore have a fully automated 24 hour shipment system from top to bottom.

eg take a metro area, lets say the san francisco bay area, and implement a system where a small handful of local warehouse sites operated by robots ship out all necessary goods for the entire bay area. so that you could order something, lets say a watch, and it will be at your front door in 15-20 minutes; like ordering a pizza. the efficiency level would exceed going out and shopping for items yourself and make brick and mortar stores obsolete. which means in addition employees that work at these stores also will become obsolete. google/amazon would shut down a very large amount of businesses that exist today (best buy, walmart, target etc) in one fell swoop with this.

in addition it would also eliminate a lot of jobs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_employers_in_the_United_States

scan that list to get an understanding of how much job loss would occur in the event that google/amazon can go through with this

would this be a good thing or bad thing?
 
Last edited:

BamdaDon

All Star
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,346
Reputation
640
Daps
8,259
I rather more people have the jobs :camby:not two or three cacs with flight package+ comptia certs
 

Liquid

Superstar
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
37,121
Reputation
2,655
Daps
59,922
I don't think people realize the possible ramifications for all these jobs being eliminated. FedEx, UPS, and the USPS employ over 1 million people...that is about to shrink to a couple of hundred if we keep going the way we are by 2030.

I realize about streamlining the processes, but we have reached the point in where we are far outpacing ourselves. The argument that more jobs will just be created for people to fix these machines are thinking small time. There will not be the need for 1 million techs to fix these things on a regular basis...at MOST a few thousand scattered across the country.
 

Yuzo

No nice guys in boxing
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
2,675
Reputation
1,430
Daps
7,266
I don't think people realize the possible ramifications for all these jobs being eliminated. FedEx, UPS, and the USPS employ over 1 million people...that is about to shrink to a couple of hundred if we keep going the way we are by 2030.

I realize about streamlining the processes, but we have reached the point in where we are far outpacing ourselves. The argument that more jobs will just be created for people to fix these machines are thinking small time. There will not be the need for 1 million techs to fix these things on a regular basis...at MOST a few thousand scattered across the country.
and whats the alternative? trap ourselves in obsolete jobs that we dont need to have anymore for the next 100 years and never more forward as a society?
 

JordanWearinThe45

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
46,047
Reputation
16,685
Daps
174,190
I don't think people realize the possible ramifications for all these jobs being eliminated. FedEx, UPS, and the USPS employ over 1 million people...that is about to shrink to a couple of hundred if we keep going the way we are by 2030.

I realize about streamlining the processes, but we have reached the point in where we are far outpacing ourselves. The argument that more jobs will just be created for people to fix these machines are thinking small time. There will not be the need for 1 million techs to fix these things on a regular basis...at MOST a few thousand scattered across the country.
Damn...thats a shyt load of ppl. Do you think protests about the 1million+ jobs being essentially eliminated by drones will cause the government (or whoever) to step in and block/limit this?
 

Liquid

Superstar
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
37,121
Reputation
2,655
Daps
59,922
and whats the alternative? trap ourselves in obsolete jobs that we dont need to have anymore for the next 100 years and never more forward as a society?
Moving forward? We have become a nation that is fatter and lazier than ever before. Are we better at communicating with technology? Sure, but that also comes at a high cost. In the united states the income inequality is only widening and if these low skill level jobs get eliminated it will only get worse.

We basically have a group of people born between 1979-1999 that is at a great disadvantage from some generations behind. Burdened with debt and a job market that looks like it might never recover in time for most of us to have the opportunities the generations behind us had. These are real life consequences dealt to a generation breh
 

Yuzo

No nice guys in boxing
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
2,675
Reputation
1,430
Daps
7,266
Moving forward? We have become a nation that is fatter and lazier than ever before. Are we better at communicating with technology? Sure, but that also comes at a high cost. In the united states the income inequality is only widening and if these low skill level jobs get eliminated it will only get worse.

We basically have a group of people born between 1979-1999 that is at a great disadvantage from some generations behind. Burdened with debt and a job market that looks like it might never recover in time for most of us to have the opportunities the generations behind us had. These are real life consequences dealt to a generation breh
so we should freeze technological progress just so we can hold on to a bunch of obsolete jobs that keep us busy just for the sake of keeping us busy? thats a horrible solution. we need to create a new model instead of just holding on the old obsolete one forever.

automating jobs is a step forward into that direction. holding on to jobs just to say we have jobs is a step backwards.
 

Liquid

Superstar
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
37,121
Reputation
2,655
Daps
59,922
so we should freeze technological progress just so we can hold on to a bunch of obsolete jobs that keep us busy just for the sake of keeping us busy? thats a horrible solution. we need to create a new model instead of just holding on the old obsolete one forever.

automating jobs is a step forward into that direction. holding on to jobs just to say we have jobs is a step backwards.
Not just for the sake of keeping us busy, but to ensure that more people have a job they can do. This whole nonsense that most of the poor just doesn't want to work is BS. Automation DOES help in the long run, my argument is that its happening so fast that it is on the verge of collapsing the economy to a point in where a true "recovery" will take a decade+

What is your solution? What do you think will happen if things keep getting worse? People get hungry and the worst comes out :demonic:
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,250
Daps
279,767
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
Damn...thats a shyt load of ppl. Do you think protests about the 1million+ jobs being essentially eliminated by drones will cause the government (or whoever) to step in and block/limit this?


Lobbyists will pour millions into making sure that the govt. wont give two flying fukks about people protesting, you see that heavy metal out in Ferguson? They will deploy that on unemployed folks in a quick second.

The writing is on the wall, they even making robots for fast food joints :dead:
 

newarkhiphop

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,156
Reputation
10,732
Daps
129,694
91c253943a654f1667043af3d3acae06e31035c.gif


Goog Set kill human labor gang
 
Top