Viewpoint: Islamophobia has a long history in the US

YvrzTrvly

All Star
Joined
Jan 16, 2015
Messages
3,811
Reputation
-187
Daps
9,017
On a macro scale yea...people gonna people.

However on a micro scale consider the situation. Meet person, become friends, learn about muslim upbringing. Does your opinion of said person change?

If yes, youre prolly a fukkwad even before we get into your religious preferences.

If not, consider yourself to have half a brain.

Never judge a book by its cover may or may not be appropriate here
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,880
Reputation
14,175
Daps
317,042
Reppin
NULL
theyre on the news with ben carson asking him to address allegations of racism :beli:

islam is not a race :dead:
 

Brosef

I respect O.G. knowledge
Supporter
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
7,457
Reputation
2,760
Daps
36,823
Reppin
T-Dot
Of course Islamophobia is rampant in the US. After all you guys are in bed with Israel. Putting together worldwide hate groups funded by the Jews :demonic:

Geert Wilders’ Dutch anti-Muslim party forced to reveal US donor
Ali Abunimah Rights and Accountability 29 September 2015

2015-4-13_geert_wilders-pegida.jpg


Notorious anti-Muslim Dutch politician Geert Wilders has been forced to disclose that he received funds from a key player in the US Islamophobia industry.

Meanwhile the lawmaker is to face charges of inciting hatred and violence against Dutch citizens of Moroccan descent during an election campaign last year.

It has long been suspected that Wilders has received US funding but that had never been proven.

In 2013, however, the Netherlands changed its law, requiring political parties to disclose the sources of donations of more than €4,500 ($5,000).

A report (download PDF) released by the Dutch interior ministry on 23 September reveals that Wilders’ Party for Freedom – known by its Dutch initials PVV – received €18,110 ($20,000) from the David Horowitz Freedom Center in 2014.

The California-based nonprofit is run by David Horowitz.

Horowitz was named in the 2011 Center for American Progress (CAP) report “Fear, Inc.: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America” as one of the most influential purveyors of anti-Muslim propaganda, along with other notorious figures including Pamela Geller and Daniel Pipes.

According to the CAP report, anti-Muslim and pro-Israel donors have pumped tens of millions of dollars into hate groups in the US in recent years.

Horowitz’s funding of Wilders is the first concrete indication that this Islamophobia network spans the globe.

Cited by mass killer
Horowitz’s organization is the sponsor of Jihad Watch, an anti-Muslim website run by Robert Spencer.

It also hosts and finances anti-Palestinian agitator Caroline Glick’s Israel Security Project.

Spencer’s anti-Muslim incitement is so extreme that it helped inspire Anders Breivik, the Norwegian who murdered dozens of his fellow citizens, mostly teenagers at a Labor Party youth camp, in July 2011, in the name of stopping the “Islamization” of Europe.

Breivik cited Spencer and his Jihad Watch blog 162 times in his manifesto justifying the mass murder.
By comparison, Glick appears only once.

Wilders, while rejecting Breivik’s methods, affirmed his support for the mass killer’s “anti-Islamization” goal.

Horowitz and his sponsored programs specialize in vicious anti-Muslim defamation and incitement, frequently with an explicitly pro-Israel twist.

Spencer disseminated the false claim of a “rape epidemic” carried out by Muslims in Norway.

Horowitz spread the equally bogus claim that a cleric had authorized Muslim men to engage in anal sex for the purpose of enlarging their rectums so they could insert bombs and become suicide bombers.

In propaganda distributed on US college campuses, Horowitz has characterized Students for Justice in Palestine as “Jew-haters.”

He claimed that the Palestinian solidarity movement was part of a wave of anti-Semitism “not seen since the 1930s, when Hitler was laying plans for the final solution – the physical extermination of European Jewry.”

Horowitz also created “Islamofascism Awareness Week” to spread this type of propaganda on college campuses.

According to its 2013 filings with the US Internal Revenue Service, the David Horowitz Freedom Center paid Horowitz $588,000 in salary and compensation that year. Spencer received about $186,000.

Spreading hate
Geert Wilders is known for spewing hatred about Islam and the Muslim community in the Netherlands.

While claiming to support free speech, he has called for the Quran to be banned.

In April, he spoke at a rally of the neo-fascist German anti-Muslim organization PEGIDA in Dresden.

He saw his popularity peak when his party won 24 of the parliament’s 150 seats in 2010, giving him a ticket to join the ruling coalition.

The PVV took 15 seats at the 2012 election.

Wilders has also given his backing to Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank.

In a recent parliamentary debate he described the refugees currently arriving in Europe as an “Islamic invasion.”

He stereotyped them as “masses of young men in their twenties with beards singing ‘Allahu Akbar’ across Europe.”

This “invasion,” he claimed, threatens Europe’s prosperity, culture and identity – words that will no doubt please his US bankroller.

Incitement
Dutch prosecutors have announced that they will charge Wilders for insulting Dutch citizens of Moroccan descent during a local election campaign.

At a March 2014 rally in The Hague, Wilders asked supporters if they wanted “more or fewer Moroccans in this city or in the Netherlands.”

In a video of the incident, members of the crowd can be heard clapping and shouting “fewer, fewer, fewer” in response.

“We will take care of it,” Wilders replies.

The public prosecutor opened a criminal investigation after complaints were filed against Wilders.

As a result, he will face accusations of insulting a group of people based on race and for inciting discrimination and hatred.

His trial is expected in 2016.


:sas2:
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
104,394
Reputation
14,174
Daps
246,551
:skip:

Where is the Islamic teaching that says you should beat Ethiopian slave girls? :martin:
Well by default it condones slavery so by default people are going to mistreat a woman that serves them, for not only being black and a servant, but being both of those while being a woman.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
93,544
Reputation
3,895
Daps
166,918
Reppin
Brooklyn
:skip:

Where is the Islamic teaching that says you should beat Ethiopian slave girls? :martin:

Qur'an (2:178) - "O ye who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the murdered; the freeman for the freeman, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female." The message of this verse, which prescribes the rules of retaliation for murder, is that all humans are not created equal. The human value of a slave is less than that of a free person (and a woman's worth is also distinguished from that of a man's).

Qur'an (16:75) - "Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah." Yet another confirmation that the slave is is not equal to the master. In this case it is plain that the slave owes his status to Allah's will. (According to 16:71, the owner should be careful about insulting Allah by bestowing Allah's gifts on slaves - those whom the god of Islam has not favored).


How lovely. What a great "culture" you share.
 

无名的

Superstar
Joined
Nov 2, 2013
Messages
5,611
Reputation
1,341
Daps
15,012
Geert Wilders’ Dutch anti-Muslim party forced to reveal US donor
Ali Abunimah Rights and Accountability 29 September 2015

source: electronicinfitada.com

:heh:

I guess the disdain can't have anything to do with the fact that the prophet was an illiterate warlord who had sex with a 9-year-old and thought an imaginary being dictated a horribly violent text to him inside of a cave.

:umad:
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,799
Reputation
570
Daps
22,758
Reppin
Arrakis
Of course Islamophobia is rampant in the US. After all you guys are in bed with Israel. Putting together worldwide hate groups funded by the Jews :demonic:

Geert Wilders’ Dutch anti-Muslim party forced to reveal US donor
Ali Abunimah Rights and Accountability 29 September 2015

2015-4-13_geert_wilders-pegida.jpg


Notorious anti-Muslim Dutch politician Geert Wilders has been forced to disclose that he received funds from a key player in the US Islamophobia industry.

Meanwhile the lawmaker is to face charges of inciting hatred and violence against Dutch citizens of Moroccan descent during an election campaign last year.

It has long been suspected that Wilders has received US funding but that had never been proven.

In 2013, however, the Netherlands changed its law, requiring political parties to disclose the sources of donations of more than €4,500 ($5,000).

A report (download PDF) released by the Dutch interior ministry on 23 September reveals that Wilders’ Party for Freedom – known by its Dutch initials PVV – received €18,110 ($20,000) from the David Horowitz Freedom Center in 2014.

The California-based nonprofit is run by David Horowitz.

Horowitz was named in the 2011 Center for American Progress (CAP) report “Fear, Inc.: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America” as one of the most influential purveyors of anti-Muslim propaganda, along with other notorious figures including Pamela Geller and Daniel Pipes.

According to the CAP report, anti-Muslim and pro-Israel donors have pumped tens of millions of dollars into hate groups in the US in recent years.

Horowitz’s funding of Wilders is the first concrete indication that this Islamophobia network spans the globe.

Cited by mass killer
Horowitz’s organization is the sponsor of Jihad Watch, an anti-Muslim website run by Robert Spencer.

It also hosts and finances anti-Palestinian agitator Caroline Glick’s Israel Security Project.

Spencer’s anti-Muslim incitement is so extreme that it helped inspire Anders Breivik, the Norwegian who murdered dozens of his fellow citizens, mostly teenagers at a Labor Party youth camp, in July 2011, in the name of stopping the “Islamization” of Europe.

Breivik cited Spencer and his Jihad Watch blog 162 times in his manifesto justifying the mass murder.
By comparison, Glick appears only once.

Wilders, while rejecting Breivik’s methods, affirmed his support for the mass killer’s “anti-Islamization” goal.

Horowitz and his sponsored programs specialize in vicious anti-Muslim defamation and incitement, frequently with an explicitly pro-Israel twist.

Spencer disseminated the false claim of a “rape epidemic” carried out by Muslims in Norway.

Horowitz spread the equally bogus claim that a cleric had authorized Muslim men to engage in anal sex for the purpose of enlarging their rectums so they could insert bombs and become suicide bombers.

In propaganda distributed on US college campuses, Horowitz has characterized Students for Justice in Palestine as “Jew-haters.”

He claimed that the Palestinian solidarity movement was part of a wave of anti-Semitism “not seen since the 1930s, when Hitler was laying plans for the final solution – the physical extermination of European Jewry.”

Horowitz also created “Islamofascism Awareness Week” to spread this type of propaganda on college campuses.

According to its 2013 filings with the US Internal Revenue Service, the David Horowitz Freedom Center paid Horowitz $588,000 in salary and compensation that year. Spencer received about $186,000.

Spreading hate
Geert Wilders is known for spewing hatred about Islam and the Muslim community in the Netherlands.

While claiming to support free speech, he has called for the Quran to be banned.

In April, he spoke at a rally of the neo-fascist German anti-Muslim organization PEGIDA in Dresden.

He saw his popularity peak when his party won 24 of the parliament’s 150 seats in 2010, giving him a ticket to join the ruling coalition.

The PVV took 15 seats at the 2012 election.

Wilders has also given his backing to Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank.

In a recent parliamentary debate he described the refugees currently arriving in Europe as an “Islamic invasion.”

He stereotyped them as “masses of young men in their twenties with beards singing ‘Allahu Akbar’ across Europe.”

This “invasion,” he claimed, threatens Europe’s prosperity, culture and identity – words that will no doubt please his US bankroller.

Incitement
Dutch prosecutors have announced that they will charge Wilders for insulting Dutch citizens of Moroccan descent during a local election campaign.

At a March 2014 rally in The Hague, Wilders asked supporters if they wanted “more or fewer Moroccans in this city or in the Netherlands.”

In a video of the incident, members of the crowd can be heard clapping and shouting “fewer, fewer, fewer” in response.

“We will take care of it,” Wilders replies.

The public prosecutor opened a criminal investigation after complaints were filed against Wilders.

As a result, he will face accusations of insulting a group of people based on race and for inciting discrimination and hatred.

His trial is expected in 2016.


:sas2:

Why should anybody care about this? If anything it's an example of European countries not respecting freedom of speech
 

Brosef

I respect O.G. knowledge
Supporter
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
7,457
Reputation
2,760
Daps
36,823
Reppin
T-Dot
Well by default it condones slavery so by default people are going to mistreat a woman that serves them, for not only being black and a servant, but being both of those while being a woman.

Qur'an (2:178) - "O ye who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the murdered; the freeman for the freeman, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female." The message of this verse, which prescribes the rules of retaliation for murder, is that all humans are not created equal. The human value of a slave is less than that of a free person (and a woman's worth is also distinguished from that of a man's).

Qur'an (16:75) - "Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah." Yet another confirmation that the slave is is not equal to the master. In this case it is plain that the slave owes his status to Allah's will. (According to 16:71, the owner should be careful about insulting Allah by bestowing Allah's gifts on slaves - those whom the god of Islam has not favored).


How lovely. What a great "culture" you share.

I'm not a scholar by any means so I can't analyze those verses but I can tell you practically, except for in backwards countries, nobody condones slavery. My understanding of slavery is that it was rampant in Saudi Arabia in those days, as was other bad shyt like drinking, fukking etc. The Quran was a guidebook for all of life, so obviously it had to discuss slaves, who were a big part of the culture back then. When the Quran was dropped it actually gave rights etc. to the slaves:

"The Prophet peace be upon him said:

Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari: "The Prophet said, "Give food to the hungry, pay a visit to the sick and release (set free) the one in captivity by paying his ransom." (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 65, Number 286)"

The Quran also instructs Muslims NOT to force their female slaves into prostitution (24:34), and even allows Muslims to marry slaves if they so desire (4:24), and to free them at times as a penalty for crime or sin (4:92, 5:89, 58:3)."

This shyt sounds terrible and unjust. But you have to remember that slaves were being abused before the Quran dropped. All these verses and stuff are archaic in the year 2015. There is no religious, political, or moral reason to condone slavery.
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
104,394
Reputation
14,174
Daps
246,551
I'm not a scholar by any means so I can't analyze those verses but I can tell you practically, except for in backwards countries, nobody condones slavery. My understanding of slavery is that it was rampant in Saudi Arabia in those days, as was other bad shyt like drinking, fukking etc. The Quran was a guidebook for all of life, so obviously it had to discuss slaves, who were a big part of the culture back then. When the Quran was dropped it actually gave rights etc. to the slaves:

"The Prophet peace be upon him said:

Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari: "The Prophet said, "Give food to the hungry, pay a visit to the sick and release (set free) the one in captivity by paying his ransom." (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 65, Number 286)"

The Quran also instructs Muslims NOT to force their female slaves into prostitution (24:34), and even allows Muslims to marry slaves if they so desire (4:24), and to free them at times as a penalty for crime or sin (4:92, 5:89, 58:3)."

This shyt sounds terrible and unjust. But you have to remember that slaves were being abused before the Quran dropped. All these verses and stuff are archaic in the year 2015. There is no religious, political, or moral reason to condone slavery.
Read what the book says bruh. You dont need to be a scholar to read plain english.
 

Brosef

I respect O.G. knowledge
Supporter
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
7,457
Reputation
2,760
Daps
36,823
Reppin
T-Dot
source: electronicinfitada.com

:heh:

I guess the disdain can't have anything to do with the fact that the prophet was an illiterate warlord who had sex with a 9-year-old and thought an imaginary being dictated a horribly violent text to him inside of a cave.

:umad:

1) Illiterate but somehow was able to trasncribe the most complex Arabic ever known to man. How? :wow:

2) :ehh: That's a new one, I had to look up this 9 year old marriage thing:

"Historical research establishes that Hadhrat Aisha was in fact ten years old at the time of her nikah which took place two years before Hijrah. Her marriage was not consummated until the third year after Hijrah making her about fifteen years old when the marriage was consummated. To be married at the age of fifteen during the time of the Holy Prophet (saw), and under the hot climate of Arabia, was not at all out of the ordinary. At the age of fifteen it was common for girls of the Arabian peninsular to mature to the age of puberty and begin married life"

3) Horribly violent? Yeah well the world was at that time too
 

Brosef

I respect O.G. knowledge
Supporter
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
7,457
Reputation
2,760
Daps
36,823
Reppin
T-Dot
Read what the book says bruh. You dont need to be a scholar to read plain english.

The book was written in Arabic, which I can't read or understand

To tell you the truth, you're right we should be reading the entire book rather than picking and choosing lines. That's how you get context.

Maybe some Muslim heads who actually know more about the religion will come drop knowledge tomorrow. I'm just telling you all what the practical views are, and how much they differ from what you guys think we believe.
 
Top