MightyHealthy
said what he said
I completely agree with the fact that a monopoly has hurt the wrestling business, but what other option was there?That is some twisty logic, bruh. Admittedly WCW was being horribly run but why would the company dying and a monopoly being created be a better option than the possibility of steps being taken to fix what was wrong with WCW and continuing to have another option in the marketplace for workers and fans?
Who was REALLY willing to buy a company that lost 60-80 million a year from Time Warner? The only other business that seriously considered buying WCW gave up on the deal when they weren't going to get the TV programming deals just handed to them. Another interesting fact about the only other company that considered buying WCW - it doesn't even exist anymore.
WCW was so horribly booked in its last couple years (and lost so much money) that fans (and businesses) couldn't even realistically mess with it anymore. Yeah, some careers got lost in the cracks (Sting, Steiner, DDP, a lot of cruiserweights), but a lot of WCW stars saw longer (and somewhat better) careers in WWE, had WCW just folded like it was inevitably snowballing towards.
And you talk about "twisty logic"Anyone who thinks Vince buying WCW was a good thing is just a WWE dikkrider and not a wrestling fan.
