Unless you're the CEO of the biggest company in the worldnikkas more concerned with irrelevant social issues than budget.

Unless you're the CEO of the biggest company in the worldnikkas more concerned with irrelevant social issues than budget.

what he say wrong?I mean, this isn't really that much of a silver bullet here. He doesn't like it, but thinks it wouldn't be an issue if all marriage were nothing more than private contracts.
He's kinda childish for being offended by it, but it's not the worst outcome of libertarian positioning.
I'd rather have Rick Scott as a President than Rand Paul.

I'm not going to. Its a bill thats 20 years old and has no relevance to today.

Anything to avoid talking about Rand Paul, huh
If its not relevant today how come gays created an entire industry of "civil rights" based on marriage equality, something in which Bill Clinton banned at the federal level by signing the Defense of Marriage Act?
Anything to avoid talking about Rand Paul, huh
DOMA isn't even law anymore.Isnt Rand Paul comments based in-part on the Defense of Marriage Act?
DOMA isn't even law anymore.
Whats your point?


What does the recognition of marriage have to do with Rand Paul's immaturity in describing it as "icky"?
If its not law anymore how come certain states dont have to recognize the marriage of gays from other states? how come married gays dont get federal benefits that straight marriages get?![]()
really?I'd rather have Rick Scott as a President than Rand Paul.
What does the recognition of marriage have to do with Rand Paul's immaturity in describing it as "icky"?
Don't be fukking dense:Isnt he talking about gay marriage? Isnt Defense of Marriage Act about gay marriage?
Don't be fukking dense:
1. DOMA is not law anymore
2. Rand Paul is talking about her personal aversion to gay marriage
1. gay marriage is a states issue1..Why isnt gay marriage federally recognized?
2..Why are you getting your panties in a bunch over a "personal aversion" to gay marriage?