Yes, but if the govt. isnt using/in possession of, a reasonable case could be made for such a ban.
and further on this point outlawing weps is silly. As we saw in the middle east, chem weps were used and no one but the U.S. really gave a shyt.
Walter E. Williams :lupe:
- Thread starter DEAD7
- Start date
and further on this point outlawing weps is silly. As we saw in the middle east, chem weps were used and no one but the U.S. really gave a shyt.
Do they? yes. Should they? no.
Regulations only affect those who follow them(the good guys) and hamper you in protecting yourself from the criminals who disregard the rules anyway(the bad guys). They are really pointless.
So if a mentally disabled violent person with no criminal background wanted to purchase weapns that are military complex uses for whatever reason should he be able to as a right to purchase and bear the weapon?
You could also say the same thing about outlawing crack, meth, etc.
Those should be legal as well, and the cost to society would be far less than it is now with them illegal.
Your first point, yes. I would question how a mentally ill person was able to afford military complex weaponry on his own, but that doesnt change the issue.
Let me will be clear, there will be bad scenarios, and losses in every system. It will never be perfect, and fringe occurrences like the ones you present are not going to be the basis for a decision either way.
How so?
Countless ways. Over 90% the fukkery attached to drug use is directly related to its legality(or lack there of).
The specifics would be too long a post, but I can easily sum up drug use as a victim-less crime. Something im wholeheartedly against.
The fact that we WANT our governments to not only regulate our weapons, but to take them away is clearly part of the plan. The entire Point of guns being protected from the start was protection from the gov, and also protection from crime.
Sure the gov can wipe out the us population in a civil war..... but we have a volunteer army not forced army. Not one mature person believe that US soldiers would kill their family and friends over some petty laws that they don't agree w in the first place.
we don't realize our power so we ALLOW wealth gaps, gun control, privacy violations, and a two party system that is more like 1 false game that allows us to fight over petty shyt.
300 million people isn't some weak shyt nikka. We are starting to deserve all this.
Sure the gov can wipe out the us population in a civil war..... but we have a volunteer army not forced army. Not one mature person believe that US soldiers would kill their family and friends over some petty laws that they don't agree w in the first place.
we don't realize our power so we ALLOW wealth gaps, gun control, privacy violations, and a two party system that is more like 1 false game that allows us to fight over petty shyt.
300 million people isn't some weak shyt nikka. We are starting to deserve all this.
NZA
LOL
this guy knows how to entertain his audience