Then there's that :jaywhoops:
yeah the helix on the bench was invisibleThen there's that :jaywhoops:
well it shows that in a quantized paradigm it can take a very simple combination (curved slots in bench, wind, gravity and snow) of random unrelated events to manifest something that looks completely designed
If I removed the information surrounding of how this came about many would immediately think it was purposefully designed by sentience
![]()
memory begets new memory in an heterogeneous energetic world
it's the same story regarding the formation of elements after the big bang and of solar/galactic systems and then of life itself.




on what basis (hypothetical or otherwise) would one objectively separate one universe from another?At this moment it truly occurred to me that we live in a multiverse. Nothing in our universe is found as a singular object. Whether we are talking about quarks, or atoms, organisms, planets, stars and galaxies, nothing is found as a singular entity.
How can a limit be set on how far out we can expand, when we have difficulty setting limits on how small things can be? Not only do we exist in a multiverse, but these other universes exist in unlimited sizes, shapes and components. For all we know we exist in an average universe, similar to how the earth is an averaged sized planet, the Sun is an average sized star and the Milky Way is just average![]()
on what basis (hypothetical or otherwise) would one objectively separate one universe from another?

would they all be expanding? if so than what would prevent them from merging beyond the point of distinction?Our universe seen from the largest scale would be a collection of galaxies in a enclosed shell. What that shell is I do not know. Beyond that would be space, then another enclosed shell of a universe.
why would they vary? meaning if there is variety here and and variety there why would we not find the same species of material in either universe, just as a consequence of similar forces and similar starting materials interacting over time?The composition of that other universe would obviously vary. Just like our DNA varies, just like there are variations in everything in this universe.
would they all be expanding? if so than what would prevent them from merging beyond the point of distinction?
why would they vary? meaning if there is variety here and and variety there why would we not find the same species of material in either universe, just as a consequence of similar forces and similar starting materials interacting over time?
Energy fields. Again you do have theories that this universe was formed from the collision of two other universes.
why are the fundamental forces not the same? is this something you imagine or do you have some objective basis for it?They would vary because it's possible that the fundamental forces would not be same. Maybe there is more of one force, or the absence of another.
yeah the helix on the bench was invisible
but
1. the raised pattern across the slots depends on hydrophilic/london force interactions between the snowflakes otherwise the whole thing is flat like the bench
2. if this example does not work look at fractals in non living systems
![]()
and things like this
![]()
*
**photoshopped :osnap:I've always said, if we didn't have insane light pollution in the cities and could actually see the milky way and other celestial bodies that our behavior would be altered. If you saw this EVERY NIGHT
![]()
you can't help but be humbled and awestruck.

