want to feel that we might not be alone, just zoom into the sharpest ever view of Andromeda

Chez Lopez

Neo-Abolitionist
Joined
Nov 22, 2014
Messages
1,785
Reputation
-1,036
Daps
2,478
Reppin
YAHUSHA HA MASHIACH
lol sorry. that's a composite image bro.

http://www.robgendlerastropics.com/M31Page.html

The following image of M31 is a mosaic of 40 separate greyscale frames taken from
September to November 2002. Color data for the mosaic came from previous images of M31
I took over the last few years using various short focal length instruments.
Cumulative exposure time for the entire mosaic was 50 hours.
Each greyscale frame was imaged at a focal length of 2000mm and
had a resolution of 1.7 to 2.5 arcseconds depending on sky conditions.
The equipment used was a 12.5" Ritchey Chretien Cassegrain (at F6) and ST10XME.
The mosaic was assembled using Adobe Photoshop 6.0




I don't mean to burst you guys collective astronomical bubble but yeah the picture was altered with color schemes from grayscale, on photoshop. cheers bros.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,889
Reputation
-34,925
Daps
641,332
Reppin
The Deep State
It is incredibly self-absorbed to claim composite images don't present a "real" look anyway. Those images are more "real" than anything our limited brains could process from our shytty under-evolved human eyes
Thing is, if you take infrared, UV, or gamma ray pics of the same thing, they look a lot different.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
786
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
It is incredibly self-absorbed to claim composite images don't present a "real" look anyway. Those images are more "real" than anything our limited brains could process from our shytty under-evolved human eyes
basically this.

If anything these composite images or "more real" than what we can ONLY see with our eyes.
 

badhat

Pro
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
602
Reputation
238
Daps
1,898
lol sorry. that's a composite image bro.

http://www.robgendlerastropics.com/M31Page.html

The following image of M31 is a mosaic of 40 separate greyscale frames taken from
September to November 2002. Color data for the mosaic came from previous images of M31
I took over the last few years using various short focal length instruments.
Cumulative exposure time for the entire mosaic was 50 hours.
Each greyscale frame was imaged at a focal length of 2000mm and
had a resolution of 1.7 to 2.5 arcseconds depending on sky conditions.
The equipment used was a 12.5" Ritchey Chretien Cassegrain (at F6) and ST10XME.
The mosaic was assembled using Adobe Photoshop 6.0




I don't mean to burst you guys collective astronomical bubble but yeah the picture was altered with color schemes from grayscale, on photoshop. cheers bros.

He never said it wasn't a composite, he said it was visible light wavelengths.
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,123
Reputation
2,571
Daps
67,724
lol sorry. that's a composite image bro.

http://www.robgendlerastropics.com/M31Page.html

The following image of M31 is a mosaic of 40 separate greyscale frames taken from
September to November 2002. Color data for the mosaic came from previous images of M31
I took over the last few years using various short focal length instruments.
Cumulative exposure time for the entire mosaic was 50 hours.
Each greyscale frame was imaged at a focal length of 2000mm and
had a resolution of 1.7 to 2.5 arcseconds depending on sky conditions.
The equipment used was a 12.5" Ritchey Chretien Cassegrain (at F6) and ST10XME.
The mosaic was assembled using Adobe Photoshop 6.0




I don't mean to burst you guys collective astronomical bubble but yeah the picture was altered with color schemes from grayscale, on photoshop. cheers bros.
that picture is a true color representation of what you would see from the human eye. I realize that it is a composite and they use technology to achieve this.

androa.jpg


lol, also, the sun isn't yellow, its white, lol, you're walking around living a lie.
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,362
Reputation
1,900
Daps
12,858
Reppin
NULL
sure thing bro. but I believed that's how space really looked until I did some further research. turns out the fantastic imagery was a lie and these nebulae and galactic gas expulsions that cause those beautiful colorful pictures are invisible.

Turns out most science is like that, a slight of hand.
so basically you got your heart broken, so you can in here to break ours early. i feel you. its the same way i felt when i first heard about this years and years ago. i was like awwww thats some bullls.. then i read WHY they do that. and it made sense. I mean we have depictions of black holes. knowing good and well you would never visually see it. even if you were right next to one. its like one of those little dust twisters that you cant see until the trash/paper close by starts spinning around. without the debris you would never see that air move. but best believe it would bother you if you stepped into it.

It just tells you we can only "SEE" so much with our 2 eyes. we need instruments to help us SEE better.
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,362
Reputation
1,900
Daps
12,858
Reppin
NULL
I've always said, if we didn't have insane light pollution in the cities and could actually see the milky way and other celestial bodies that our behavior would be altered. If you saw this EVERY NIGHT

milky-way-over-texas-larry-landolfi.jpg


you can't help but be humbled and awestruck.
you may be on to something. while we get smarter and dont attribute everything we see in the sky to God or some sun/moon god. because we some what understand how it works. but perhaps the reason those folks back in the day were all awed by it wasnt because they didnt know how it worked. but because they could visually see it at work all day, every day.
 
Top