"WAS THERE A CONSPIRACY TO GET RID OF CONSCIOUS RAP???" | DJ RED ALERT GIVES US THE HISTORY...

KingsOfKings

โ„๏ธ ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•, ๐–‚๐–๐–Š๐–—๐–Š ๐–œ๐–Š ๐•ฌ๐–™ ๐–‚๐–Ž๐–™๐– ๐•ด๐–™! โ„๏ธ
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
76,149
Reputation
37,104
Daps
97,376
Yeah I know that there is a official math Hoffa thread but I felt like this need it own stand alone thread. For discussion.


 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
53,802
Reputation
20,480
Daps
294,574
No. Kids and teenagers gravitate to more subversive shyt, across art mediums. It's why if your parents didn't let you watch R-rated movies you tried to sneak watch them. If you found porn as a kid, you hid it so you could look at it. In the 60s-90s rock kept getting more and more subversive. More drug content, and later more violence. I don't think it's shocking that rapping about killing people and fukking bytches is far more enticing to teenage boys than rapping about Afrocentricity or learning.

Once NWA showed that rap could sell as much as rock, it was over for positive shyt. There is no conspiracy about the market deciding based on popularity/sales/etc. Things are probably more balanced now in the since that most of the biggest rappers, if not the biggest, aren't making gangster music (Drake, Kendrick, Cole, Travis, Uzi, etc).
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,999
Reputation
9,610
Daps
81,823
No. Kids and teenagers gravitate to more subversive shyt, across art mediums. It's why if your parents didn't let you watch R-rated movies you tried to sneak watch them. If you found porn as a kid, you hid it so you could look at it. In the 60s-90s rock kept getting more and more subversive. More drug content, and later more violence. I don't think it's shocking that rapping about killing people and fukking bytches is far more enticing to teenage boys than rapping about Afrocentricity or learning.

Once NWA showed that rap could sell as much as rock, it was over for positive shyt. There is no conspiracy about the market deciding based on popularity/sales/etc. Things are probably more balanced now in the since that most of the biggest rappers, if not the biggest, aren't making gangster music (Drake, Kendrick, Cole, Travis, Uzi, etc).


this
 

tuckgod

The high exalted
Bushed
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
52,029
Reputation
15,663
Daps
187,827
No. Kids and teenagers gravitate to more subversive shyt, across art mediums. It's why if your parents didn't let you watch R-rated movies you tried to sneak watch them. If you found porn as a kid, you hid it so you could look at it. In the 60s-90s rock kept getting more and more subversive. More drug content, and later more violence. I don't think it's shocking that rapping about killing people and fukking bytches is far more enticing to teenage boys than rapping about Afrocentricity or learning.

Once NWA showed that rap could sell as much as rock, it was over for positive shyt. There is no conspiracy about the market deciding based on popularity/sales/etc. Things are probably more balanced now in the since that most of the biggest rappers, if not the biggest, aren't making gangster music (Drake, Kendrick, Cole, Travis, Uzi, etc).
I gravitated moreso towards the artsy/intellectual shyt like Outkast, Common, The Roots, Fugees, etc. as a teen.

shyt i thought the smart, college type kids was listening to.

You gravitate to what you donโ€™t have easy access to as a teen.
 

Kenny West

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
25,232
Reputation
6,179
Daps
93,074
Reppin
NULL
No. Kids and teenagers gravitate to more subversive shyt, across art mediums. It's why if your parents didn't let you watch R-rated movies you tried to sneak watch them. If you found porn as a kid, you hid it so you could look at it. In the 60s-90s rock kept getting more and more subversive. More drug content, and later more violence. I don't think it's shocking that rapping about killing people and fukking bytches is far more enticing to teenage boys than rapping about Afrocentricity or learning.

Once NWA showed that rap could sell as much as rock, it was over for positive shyt. There is no conspiracy about the market deciding based on popularity/sales/etc. Things are probably more balanced now in the since that most of the biggest rappers, if not the biggest, aren't making gangster music (Drake, Kendrick, Cole, Travis, Uzi, etc).
This logic is total bullshyt.

You don't see this dynamic you described across other musical genres, or other cultures (without influence of modern rap), nor has it been a consistent dynamic in any other time period lifetime.

Blues didn't get more subverisve and violent, neither did motown, neither does Kpop or Citypop.

Hell, if you checked on rock past that cherrypicked time pocket you would see it got less subversive/more soft & poppy as the 2000s got later and moved into the 2010s.
 

MasterThought

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,432
Reputation
2,493
Daps
22,314
Of course it was :dead:

To believe otherwise means you have not the slightest knowledge of past history.

Rap music was hijacked and WEAPONIZED against the black community mainly as a propaganda tool as someone in here has already mentioned.

Rap Music is a continuation of Minstrel Shows of the past:

nKyfIF5.jpg


BO3NJa1.jpg


Rap Music is an updated version of Minstrel Shows being used to perpetuate the most negative stereotypes of blacks to a worldwide audience, which is why the main image of rappers pushed are gangbangers, thugs and drugdealers.

And the people doing the pushing and funding look like this:

qtejtNZ.png


Lz25YiC.jpg


Again, if you deny this, all I can do is assume you have zero awareness of past history.
 

O.Red

Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
18,901
Reputation
5,958
Daps
75,880
Reppin
NULL
A cac that used to be a musician told me the labels mostly push the gangster rap for propaganda and profits, they dont want black people doing thier own distribution they wouldn't need the labels if they did.
Thats giving the labels too much credit. The labels chase the money at the end of the day

Most drill artists are poppin like a mf and never been heard of by a label. This ain't 1999. Plenty of nikkas eating just off YouTube and shows

 

O.Red

Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
18,901
Reputation
5,958
Daps
75,880
Reppin
NULL
This logic is total bullshyt.

You don't see this dynamic you described across other musical genres, or other cultures (without influence of modern rap), nor has it been a consistent dynamic in any other time period lifetime.

Blues didn't get more subverisve and violent, neither did motown, neither does Kpop or Citypop.

Hell, if you checked on rock past that cherrypicked time pocket you would see it got less subversive/more soft & poppy as the 2000s got later and moved into the 2010s.
The thing is the people that listen to the genres you just listed also listen to rap

Hip hop is the outlet for subversion, violence and rebellion
 

SleezyBigSlim

Banned
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
19,882
Reputation
-1,516
Daps
52,912
Thats giving the labels too much credit. The labels chase the money at the end of the day

Most drill artists are poppin like a mf and never been heard of by a label. This ain't 1999. Plenty of nikkas eating just off YouTube and shows

White men own all those distribution platforms you mentioned. That's the entire point. Gives you nikkas the illusion of freedom when infact you have none
 

O.Red

Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
18,901
Reputation
5,958
Daps
75,880
Reppin
NULL
White men own all those distribution platforms you mentioned. That's the entire point. Gives you nikkas the illusion of freedom when infact you have none
I'm not under any illusion of freedom but nikkas gotta stop the one sided shyt

Violent music ain't just being forced onto people. The consumers LOVE the shyt and nobody wants to say this out loud.
 
Top