
I provided proof that you need two or more people all you did is found a root word definition lol that doesn't even correspond to what you are trying to say.
You didn't, I used your own definition to prove you wrong, because it implies sexual behavior towards the same sex which is yourself
then I gave you the meaning of the root word homo which means one and the same
you can't refute shyt, you're in denial
you're a coward who refuses to acknowledge the truth
by your logic you can suck your own dikk and it won't be homosexual lmao you are mentally disturb
 I know you are fighting those gay urges and that the pray the gay away therapy didn't work but you dont have to try to make everyone else gay to help deal with the pain.I know you are fighting those gay urges and that the pray the gay away therapy didn't work but you dont have to try to make everyone else gay to help deal with the pain.
If your primary means of sexual contact is a male hand, how is that less gay than someone suggesting you have all your sexual contact with women?I know you are fighting those gay urges and that the pray the gay away therapy didn't work but you dont have to try to make everyone else gay to help deal with the pain.
how can you be gay for yourself get the fukk outta here with this bullshyt.
Its not gay at all see the definition for homosexuality I provided in post number 178 the term is being misused you cant be gay with yourself. http://www.thecoli.com/posts/20432905/If your primary means of sexual contact is a male hand, how is that less gay than someone suggesting you have all your sexual contact with women?
Tranny/homo logic. Looking for any angle they can to mainstream tehmselves

Its not gay at all see the definition for homosexuality I provided in post number 178 the term is being misused you cant be gay with yourself. http://www.thecoli.com/posts/20432905/
Nope you are trying to fit something within a definition that does not fit. I believe they call that an agenda.I'm just addressing the notion that OP's friend/master teacher are somehow gay for telling people to fall back off the porn.
I understand it isn't homo by definition. But a definition is just words, a rhetorical device. People make up words every day, it doesn't trump actions and things that happen in the real world.
The fact is a porn addict's primary means of sexual contact involve deriving pleasure from seeing another man getting pleasure. Normal hetero sex wouldn't involve another man at all. Furthermore the physical stimulation is coming from physical contact from male body parts with no female at all. This means a porn addict has becoming acclimated with a man's touch for sexual stimulation.
Masturbation by definition only wouldn't fall under hetro or homo sex, but based on the variables involved it's closer to the latter than the former wouldn't you say?