Obviously Serena is the best women's tennis player of our generation, but trying to compare Serena, and Tiger is kind of crazy. From somebody who has played both sports, golf is by far a more difficult sport. Take into account that in golf you are actually playing the course instead of another competitor. In tennis you are playing another competitor, so in tennis your physical gifts are of a much greater advantage. If I'm faster, stronger, or quicker, it has much more of an impact in tennis than it does in golf, which keeps the playing field in golf more level. The thing about Serena, is that she really is like the Lebron James of tennis. Her athletic advantage is so great against the rest of the field, that her C+ game many times is to good for the rest of the field. Minus that ass,

the men's game is far more interesting, at least at the top, than the women's game. Serena only looses when she isn't focused, but anybody in the top 5 of the men's game (Nadal is washed

) could beat any other top 5 player. Nobody on the women's side can beat Serena when she is on. Like OP said, she be having these hoes outchea crying.

Both have had great careers, but I think what Tiger has done over the course of his career, is equal, if not greater than what Serena has done.

Serena is the better "athlete", but they are about even when it comes to individual sports success.