We ignoring Serena, THE GOAT now?

[Ohene]

that ass pic dont even make sense

 

[richtree]

Its amazing how long her run has been in tennis and even though she had a bit of downtime, still able to come back and win more titles.
Even more amazing is how she's able to run around with all that ass

 

[PS5 Pro]

Serena was the best player in the early 2000s when she was going against the Belgian Kims, her sister, Capriati, and Hingis.

Venus was the best player back then, Serena came on around 2002. Won that good Serena slam in 2003 and been holding it down for 10yrs (even tho she lost top spot for a year)

Serena has been winning Grand Slams for over 14 years now. Meaning she has played against 2 different generations of Tennis players.

And yet you still can't name the 2nd ranked player

You cant me who the 2nd ranked golfer without looking up

Tiger only rival throughout his career is an inconsistent Lefty. In Serena prime, the Ladies tournament were more competitive than the men side (Tru Story)
She have to battle Lindsey Davenport, Clijsters, Hingis, Sharpova, Henin, and Venus. She conquer them all and now slaying players who 6-7 younger than her.

Serena >>>> Tiger

Phil Mickelson
As for the Ladies tournament being more competitive than the mens, thats because Tennis has fallen off. But Mens tennis didn't fall off like you saying
Aggassi to Sampress to whats his face to nadal to Djovic. Still great tennis been played over the last decade. But that isn't the point...
You seem to have forgotten what made Tiger, Tiger. Tiger been a pro for 21yrs now. 21 full years. You remember the l
ast 3yrs and now the previous 18yrs is out of sight, out of mind
Serena is a physical specimen, that is why she is as good as she is. She is notorious for having too many unforced errors during her career. But now I'm speaking a language you guys probably don't even know.

Sounds like Pete Sampras....

Serena is up there though.

Seles in her prime.
Steffi Graf (had the hots for this broad, even with the nose... )
Evert
Navritolova (she was on them PEDs though).

Steffi still the GOAT to me (22 grand slam titles), hopefully Serena can pass her, but I doubt it.

You named a bunch of great players, and all those players KILL the competion Serena faces nowadays.
Thats why nobody can name the 2nd ranked player, or any player in the top 10. So her beating a bunch of nobodies is not impressive.

Floyd Mayweather consistently has faced tougher opponents than Serena

 

[KingJudah]

If LeBron and Serena procreated their seed (hopefully male) would be a metahuman

Hopefully has the heart of Serena though

 

[Rekkapryde]

You named a bunch of great players, and all those players KILL the competion Serena faces nowadays.
Thats why nobody can name the 2nd ranked player, or any player in the top 10. So her beating a bunch of nobodies is not impressive.

Yeah Sharapova is
All dem other hoes are garbage too.

But she makin these hoes cry and shyt doggie.

 

[Digga38]

Hopefully has the heart of Serena though

 

[PS5 Pro]

Yeah Sharapova is
All dem other hoes are garbage too.

But she makin these hoes cry and shyt doggie.

That makes it even worse tho, thats how soft her competition is
Imagine all the former greats crying

The female Tennis players of today are famous not for Tennis, but because a magazine wants to act like shes the best looking euro bytches ever
Real Talk, and most ppl are aware of this. Marketing >>> Skillz

 

[El Bombi]

Venus was e best player back then, Serena came on around 2002. Won that good Serena slam in 2003 and been holding it down for 10yrs (even tho she lost top spot for a year)

And yet you still can't name the 2nd ranked player

Phil Mickelson
As for the Ladies tournament being more competitive than the mens, thats because Tennis has fallen off. But Mens tennis didn't fall off like you saying
Aggassi to Sampress to whats his face to nadal to Djovic. Still great tennis been played over the last decade. But that isn't the point...
You seem to have forgotten what made Tiger, Tiger. Tiger been a pro for 21yrs now. 21 full years. You remember the l
ast 3yrs and now the previous 18yrs is out of sight, out of mind
Serena is a physical specimen, that is why she is as good as she is. She is notorious for having too many unforced errors during her career. But now I'm speaking a language you guys probably don't even know.


You named a bunch of great players, and all those players KILL the competion Serena faces nowadays.
Thats why nobody can name the 2nd ranked player, or any player in the top 10. So her beating a bunch of nobodies is not impressive.

Floyd Mayweather consistently has faced tougher opponents than Serena

You never asked me who is the 2nd ranked player is.
But to answer your question. 2 & 3 are probably still Azarenka and Maria.

I guess you don't see us post in the Tennis thread

 

[dem bath salts]

Venus was the best player back then, Serena came on around 2002. Won that good Serena slam in 2003 and been holding it down for 10yrs (even tho she lost top spot for a year)

And yet you still can't name the 2nd ranked player

Phil Mickelson
As for the Ladies tournament being more competitive than the mens, thats because Tennis has fallen off. But Mens tennis didn't fall off like you saying
Aggassi to Sampress to whats his face to nadal to Djovic. Still great tennis been played over the last decade. But that isn't the point...
You seem to have forgotten what made Tiger, Tiger. Tiger been a pro for 21yrs now. 21 full years. You remember the l
ast 3yrs and now the previous 18yrs is out of sight, out of mind
Serena is a physical specimen, that is why she is as good as she is. She is notorious for having too many unforced errors during her career. But now I'm speaking a language you guys probably don't even know.


You named a bunch of great players, and all those players KILL the competion Serena faces nowadays.
Thats why nobody can name the 2nd ranked player, or any player in the top 10. So her beating a bunch of nobodies is not impressive.

Floyd Mayweather consistently has faced tougher opponents than Serena

what you fail to mention is she won most of those majors while those great players were still around.
be real, you never really watched the womens game.

She was so goat that she even won a major a year before Venus and she wasn't even polished yet. Goat

You're outta ur mind when talking about the mens game as well. Men tennis was dunzo for at least 3 and half years until Fed rose up. Sampras was washed, somehow he pulled off a miracle to win that last open and Agassi was slow. We went thru a period when the top players were Hewitt, Ferrero, Roddikk and Safin. Nobody gave a shyt about them and neither of them has more than 2 majors. The Women carried tennis before Fed. Her competition shyts on Tigers. Inconsistent phil. Old ernie and VJ, and the field who wasnt worth shyt.
b

 

[SubZeroDegrees]

I look it up to make sure

As for the Ladies tournament being more competitive than the mens, thats because Tennis has fallen off. But Mens tennis didn't fall off like you saying
Aggassi to Sampress to whats his face to nadal to Djovic. Still great tennis been played over the last decade. But that isn't the point...
You seem to have forgotten what made Tiger, Tiger. Tiger been a pro for 21yrs now. 21 full years. You remember the l
ast 3yrs and now the previous 18yrs is out of sight, out of mind
Serena is a physical specimen, that is why she is as good as she is. She is notorious for having too many unforced errors during her career. But now I'm speaking a language you guys probably don't even know.

Tennis fell off

Stop it.

Serena >>>> Tiger

 

[PS5 Pro]

You never asked me who is the 2nd ranked player is.
But to answer your question. 2 & 3 are probably still Azarenka and Maria.

I guess you don't see us post in the Tennis thread

Look at what site you on, there isn't a REAL tennis thread on this place
Only thing this group cares about is a Serena ass pic. Make a thread titled "Do you know who Azarenka znd Maria are" and that thread will be a ghost town

what you fail to mention is she won most of those majors while those great players were still around.
be real, you never really watched the womens game.

She was so goat that she even won a major a year before Venus and she wasn't even polished yet. Goat

You're outta ur mind when talking about the mens game as well. Men tennis was dunzo for at least 3 and half years until Fed rose up. Sampras was washed, somehow he pulled off a miracle to win that last open and Agassi was slow. We went thru a period when the top players were Hewitt, Ferrero, Roddikk and Safin. Nobody gave a shyt about them and neither of them has more than 2 majors. The Women carried tennis before Fed. Her competition shyts on Tigers. Inconsistent phil. Old ernie and VJ, and the field who wasnt worth shyt.
b

You didn't name Tigers competition over the last 21yrs. You named the last 8yrs and called it a day
You don't know shyt about womens tennis either, this isn't about all the irreleveant shyt you talking about. Its about Serena vs Tiger
Nobody anywhere is even debating this. Yes, Serena is a beast. But its MUCH harder to accomplish what Tiger has done in his career than what Serena has in hers. Serena isn't even the top womans tennis player in history. Tiger is that, even tho he doesn't have all the records yet, he's already Jordan of the Golf game
Serena has the physical advantage, often times twice the size of her competition. So she's closer to Lebron.
Her competition, you gotta go back almost 10yrs to find her competition. And even those ppl weren't all time greats.
But lets just ignore the fact Tennis ups models more than actual talent. Thats what gets promoted, what they focus on. The actual sport is suffering like a muthafukka. If this was the 80's, Serena wouldn't be as dominate. Put Tiger in any time period and he'd still be the same tiger tho (Tru Story)

Tennis fell off

Stop it.

Serena >>>> Tiger

I don't think you are qualified to even speak on this bruh. Tiger been playing professionaly for 21yrs. If that means he started playing when you was an embryo?
You missed out on what made him Tiger in the first place. Your bad

 

[dem bath salts]

Look at what site you on, there isn't a REAL tennis thread on this place
Only thing this group cares about is a Serena ass pic. Make a thread titled "Do you know who Azarenka znd Maria are" and that thread will be a ghost town

You didn't name Tigers competition over the last 21yrs. You named the last 8yrs and called it a day
You don't know shyt about womens tennis either, this isn't about all the irreleveant shyt you talking about. Its about Serena vs Tiger
Nobody anywhere is even debating this. Yes, Serena is a beast. But its MUCH harder to accomplish what Tiger has done in his career than what Serena has in hers. Serena isn't even the top womans tennis player in history. Tiger is that, even tho he doesn't have all the records yet, he's already Jordan of the Golf game
Serena has the physical advantage, often times twice the size of her competition. So she's closer to Lebron.
Her competition, you gotta go back almost 10yrs to find her competition. And even those ppl weren't all time greats.
But lets just ignore the fact Tennis ups models more than actual talent. Thats what gets promoted, what they focus on. The actual sport is suffering like a muthafukka. If this was the 80's, Serena wouldn't be as dominate. Put Tiger in any time period and he'd still be the same tiger tho (Tru Story)

I don't think you are qualified to even speak on this bruh. Tiger been playing professionaly for 21yrs. If that means he started playing when you was an embryo?
You missed out on what made him Tiger in the first place. Your bad

at you trying to figure out my age. I'mma let you stew on it, but know that I've seen enough to know what I'm talking about.

Serena>tiger

 

[SubZeroDegrees]

Look at what site you on, there isn't a REAL tennis thread on this place
Only thing this group cares about is a Serena ass pic. Make a thread titled "Do you know who Azarenka znd Maria are" and that thread will be a ghost town

You didn't name Tigers competition over the last 21yrs. You named the last 8yrs and called it a day
You don't know shyt about womens tennis either, this isn't about all the irreleveant shyt you talking about. Its about Serena vs Tiger
Nobody anywhere is even debating this. Yes, Serena is a beast. But its MUCH harder to accomplish what Tiger has done in his career than what Serena has in hers. Serena isn't even the top womans tennis player in history. Tiger is that, even tho he doesn't have all the records yet, he's already Jordan of the Golf game
Serena has the physical advantage, often times twice the size of her competition. So she's closer to Lebron.
Her competition, you gotta go back almost 10yrs to find her competition. And even those ppl weren't all time greats.
But lets just ignore the fact Tennis ups models more than actual talent. Thats what gets promoted, what they focus on. The actual sport is suffering like a muthafukka. If this was the 80's, Serena wouldn't be as dominate. Put Tiger in any time period and he'd still be the same tiger tho (Tru Story)

I don't think you are qualified to even speak on this bruh. Tiger been playing professionaly for 21yrs. If that means he started playing when you was an embryo?
You missed out on what made him Tiger in the first place. Your bad

Tiger been a pro for 17 years not 21. You dummy

The same career length as Serena, who have more majors against better competition then Eldrick.

Serena >>>>> Tiger

 

[mastermind]

Venus was the best player back then, Serena came on around 2002. Won that good Serena slam in 2003 and been holding it down for 10yrs (even tho she lost top spot for a year)

Ok, and during the early noughts, who were her rivals?

 

[PS5 Pro]

at you trying to figure out my age. I'mma let you stew on it, but know that I've seen enough to know what I'm talking about.

Serena>tiger

Look "kid" only children put up "laughing smiley's" when they not saying anything funny
See "kid" you "think" I'm trying to figure out how old you are. I already know how old you are. Maybe not the exact age, I don't know your birthday
But just like if you was having a convo with an 8yr old, how you can tell? Ditto here. Thats why your playing dumb on that because you know the truth would set you free from bullshytting any longer.
I can't speak on Wilt Chamberlin, Oscar Robinson, ppl like that because they was before my time. You know of Tiger today, you heard about tiger of yesteryear
But you don't KNOW shyt. Don't be mad I'm the one nikka round dis bytch that will always shoot for the truth and not leave an fukks behind

Tiger been a pro for 17 years not 21. You dummy

The same career length as Serena, who have more majors against better competition then Eldrick.

Serena >>>>> Tiger

My bad, 18yrs (1996) but closer to 19yrs now. My point isn't now changed is it

Ok, and during the early noughts, who were her rivals?

If you have to ask, then that should tell you something
Nobody ask who any other all-time great played against, we know this stuff. Serena, people can just toss out blanket statements of names
But I certain the same ppl you guys name, you have no idea if they had a rivalry with Serena or not. You guys have already made that mistake, you could go back to see who you named. But thats not even important or the topic. Serena is great, could beat any woman tennis player in history.
Who gives a shyt about womans tennis tho thats like talking about womans basketball. Like, nobody would call the greatest woman basketball player in the same league as Jordan.. or Barkley..... or AC Green
Golf, the hardest sport to play well. Tiger is the best ever. And you guys are comparing a women who is physically twice the size of her opponents as better?

The crack rocks in the water