We need a OBJECTIVE RATING SYSTEM (Calling Chicks Dimes...smh)

[WaveCapsByOscorp™]

That's why I said the Rating System should be objective. So that even if we agree we will know how they came up with the number.

i'm saying you won't be able to properly judge beauty with whatever system you create. it'll give some insight, but not nearly enough unless you plan to make it as basic as possible without nuances...

 

[Son Of God]

For coli the judging system is more simple like

I'd fukk

or

Burn with fire

Yeah, I would say use binary numbers.

0 for I won't hit, or not my type.

1 for I'll smash, she is my type.

Simple and very easy.

 

[Po pimp]

This is retarded. What I look like calling an ugly ass chick with a banging body an 8?

 

[The Prince of All Saiyans]

you need to take into account ethnicity on the coli, breh

 

[Jesus Shuttlesworth]

For coli the judging system is more simple like

I'd fukk

or

Burn with fire

That's what I'm saying. The simpler the better. A simple ye or nay will do. Spare me the details.

 

[Ronnie Lott]

NO you don't

Looks are subjective some nikkas like t*ts and faces or legs,hips and ass or all of that.I base it of what Im attracted to.

A chick who's funny or has personality will always be more attractive to me than a real,real pretty chick wit the personality of a doorknob despite her not looking as good

Yeah right nygga. like u would choose to fucc with/date/smash this chick even tho she has a great personality

Or this chick with a boring personality

 

[unit321]

(0-2) Face
(0-2) Chest
(0-2) Ass
(0-2) Weight
(0-2) Shape

Easier said than done. It's not realistic because its all subjective.

 

[Black Magisterialness]

you cant make and objective rating system on something that is as arbitrary as attractiveness....



There are some females that nikkas on the coli over that make me truly

 

[Fredrick Thuglas]

For coli the judging system is more simple like

I'd fukk

or

Burn with fire

But how would you compare two chicks that you would fukk?

Yeah, I would say use binary numbers.

0 for I won't hit, or not my type.

1 for I'll smash, she is my type.

Simple and very easy.

same as above

Easier said than done. It's not realistic because its all subjective.

its more about knowing how nikkas come up with the number not agreeing on the number that was given.

you cant make and objective rating system on something that is as arbitrary as attractiveness....

same as comment above

There are some females that nikkas on the coli over that make me truly

That's why I want a common system...Im an analytical person, I can't keep dealing with these random ass numbers.

 

[unit321]

its more about knowing how nikkas come up with the number not agreeing on the number that was given.

I understand that.
But say you have someone who looks like Stacey Dash but has small breasts. One dude who dislikes small breasts is just going to go AWOL and give all zeros. Other times, you are going to have someone who has a face like Della Reese but has a big round butt and he's going to give a 10. What's that about?

 

[god shamgod]

Yeah right nygga. like u would choose to fucc with/date/smash this chick even tho she has a great personality

Or this chick with a boring personality

You're using extreme examples

Im sayin if a chick was a 6-7 wit personality,funny etc compared to a dime wit no personality at all I'd take the 6-7

That broad from precious is disgusting

 

[Fredrick Thuglas]

I understand that.
But say you have someone who looks like Stacey Dash but has small breasts. One dude who dislikes small breasts is just going to go AWOL and give all zeros. Other times, you are going to have someone who has a face like Della Reese but has a big round butt and he's going to give a 10. What's that about?

That's why the rating system will eradicate the crazy ratings.

If I like big breast and I want to rate a fine ass Stacey Dash, I can't penalize her for no more than "2" points. Look at the example below.

THEORETICAL RATING...
Face - 2
Chest - 0
But - 1
Shape - 2
Weight - 2

Total = 7

So even if a nikka hated small chested women, he can't logically rate Stacey Dash a 0 because he would have to explain his other scores.

 

[Ronnie Lott]

You're using extreme examples

Im sayin if a chick was a 6-7 wit personality,funny etc compared to a dime wit no personality at all I'd take the 6-7

That broad from precious is disgusting

ok. i see what you are saying now

 

[Cat piss martini]

Yeah right nygga. like u would choose to fucc with/date/smash this chick even tho she has a great personality

Or this chick with a boring personality

boring broad......final answer chuck!

 

[cleanface coney]

AINT NO SUCH THING AS A DIME UNLESS SHE GOT SOME GOOD p*ssy

nikkaS ACT LIKE THAT DONT COUNT

SO IN CASE I NEVER fukkED A DIME BEFORE

BUT I fukkED A STRONG 9 LOL

8 WIT SOME GOOD p*ssy