MenacingMonk
War & Peace
And how it's overrated and shouldn't be taken at his value.
No, this isn't about Okada/Omega, but this thread was inspired by it. We all know we should judge things based on what we the viewer see. In the wrestling community (and even the industry to an extent) Meltz's view is like the Bible.
I was just watching a match with Styles and Ibushi that he gave 4.75 stars. Now that's high. The match, however, was far from that. It's a good match, don't get me wrong, but he rated it to high.
Another match, or matches, I wanna point out are Austin/Hart. WM13, A 5 star match according to Double Talk. Now before this match happened the 2 faced off at Survivor Series 96. A 4.5 match (Meltzer). That match, in my eyes, is a classic. I like the Mania one, but the SS one was better. I think Austin (and maybe Bret?) even said it was better, too.
Of course it's all opinion. When this dude Meltzer gives his thoughts on a match, people shouldn't hang on it like it's gospel.
	
		
			
		
		
	
			
			No, this isn't about Okada/Omega, but this thread was inspired by it. We all know we should judge things based on what we the viewer see. In the wrestling community (and even the industry to an extent) Meltz's view is like the Bible.
I was just watching a match with Styles and Ibushi that he gave 4.75 stars. Now that's high. The match, however, was far from that. It's a good match, don't get me wrong, but he rated it to high.
Another match, or matches, I wanna point out are Austin/Hart. WM13, A 5 star match according to Double Talk. Now before this match happened the 2 faced off at Survivor Series 96. A 4.5 match (Meltzer). That match, in my eyes, is a classic. I like the Mania one, but the SS one was better. I think Austin (and maybe Bret?) even said it was better, too.
Of course it's all opinion. When this dude Meltzer gives his thoughts on a match, people shouldn't hang on it like it's gospel.

