fukk him

fukk him

Athletic phenom and is a straight up beast, but yes he is overrated. Hes a known stat padder and even with help, he hasn't brought his team to legit title contention. James Harden shouldve honestly won last year and has proved to be a much better player than Westbrook given the numbers and team performance.
Houston is number 1 in western conference, what's OKC right now?A better player whose been choking in big moments since college..ooooo k
I hope this wack ass nikka average a triple double this season and not win the MVP and see how people explain why he was the MVP last year and not this year
Houston is number 1 in western conference, what's OKC right now?
OKC will be eliminated in the first round while Houston makes it to conference finals with GSW. They'll lose to GSW but they will make it to conference finals. Then paul george will go to the lakers or some other team, Carmelo will continue to deteriorate and OKC will continue to regress but hey Westbrook averaging another triple double tho!!Your comment is indicative of Harden's issue...You think October to April is the most important part of the year lmao
Breh u are a dumbass.
The first example is a made up stat about baseball
By your logic him getting a triple double SHOULD lead to a loss, yet it doesn't. U can create a narrative for whatever stats but the FACT remains they win more when he gets triple doubles.![]()

Really so it is easier to get assists when your teammates score
![]()
And its easier to get rebounds when the other team misses
![]()
Damn bro, what else can you teach me![]()

Maybe I need to make the explanation easier for some people in the audience.
"My baseball coach told me that I shouldn't try to hit a home run on every swing. However, when I hit 3 home runs in a game, we win 80% of the time. Therefore, I should obviously be trying to hit a home run on every swing. Even though in most of the other games I go 0-5 and we lose despite having a talented team."
or how about an even easier one:
"The Warriors are 14-2 this year when Stephen Curry plays less than 30 minutes. They were 16-2 last year when Stephen Curry played less than 30 minutes. [Those are actual stats.] Therefore, the Warriors should be playing Curry less than 30 minutes every game!"
That's how stupid logic sounds when you don't understand cause and effect.
Do you understand the problem with your logic yet, or do I need to go even slower?
Edit: Wait, here's the best one so far.
The Warriors have won 88% of their games this year when Draymond scores at least 15 points. And they have won 100% of their games when Draymond takes at least 16 shots!
Obviously, the Warriors need to be feeding Draymond all game!
I don’t give a fukk what NOBODY say a nikka that AVERAGES a triple double for an entire season aint overrated.

