44% on twos is

, especially against the Suns. You realize there wasn't a single team in the NBA who shot that bad on twos last year? Even the Lakers were 45% from twos (almost 47% if you don't count Kobe). The freaking Sixers were 48% on twos. Just about everyone else was over 50%.
And Phoenix's defense was 26th out of 30 teams last year in opponent field goal %.
44% on twos is 0.88 points per shot. That's bad. You can't win many games with that unless you're playing some really, really good defense.
FG% is one of the clearest, most consistent, obviously meaningful stats out there.
If you make your shot, your team gets 2-3 points on that one possession.
If you miss your shot, your team gets 0 points on that possession unless they get an offensive board.
High scoring might just mean you were hogging the ball. Big assist numbers can come from high usage too. Bulking up rebounds might just mean the other team missed a lot of shots, or that your teammates defer to you on the defensive boards. Steals and blocks can come from taking too many risks on defense.
And all five on those things can go up or down with pace, which tells you nothing about wins and losses.
But if your FG% is shyt, you're hurting your team...unless they're all shooting even shyttier than you are.
(And, in this case, the rest of the Thunder shot 46%.)
Yeah, one of those posts makes slightly more sense than the other.
Go 17-44 and dominate the ball in a home game against the freaking Phoenix Suns, and now you're "truly the best player in the league".
The Suns started Booker-Bledsoe-Dudley-Warren-Chandler. Knight, Len, and Criss filled out their 8.
The KINGS beat the Suns by 20 already.
Can you imagine what record Lebron or Durant would have with Oladipo, Adams, Sabonis, and Robeson as the starting five? The question would be what their playoff seed would be, not whether they could squeak by with a close win against one of the worst teams in the league.