just thought of something on lies my teacher told me, when hes talking about woodrow wilson and helen keller, how we shouldnt whitewash people like basically maybe im reading it wrong but he implies socialism is a negative and they hid it to protect hellen kellers image, but i dont know if i agree, i think they hide the fact that a ton of people that are now heros were socialists, mlk jr for example, its because theyve erased the socialist history of this country completly, even the fact we dont celebrate mayday but it started here but thats when the world celebrates it. thats one reason i like peoples history, yes its dudes opinion but more so it gives you the socialist perspective that is completly missing from the textbooks. i mean you mentioned it mainstream narrative. where as lies is trying to make an overall point and uses certain instances in history but its not really a complete retelling, though the reconstruction stuff is great and much better than anything in peoples history. but both two of my favorites, but what is your opinion on that? did they hide helen keller or someone like mlk jr being a socialist to protect them or more so to erase any reference to socialism in America so people just assume its this foreign thing here and we have no history of it and its evil ?This was a positive thread so I didn't want to hate...but one list in particular had me going
Another book in this thread (not from that terrible list) seriously had, "Highly recommended by prison inmates and celebrities" in the lead paragraph of its summary.
Lies My Teacher Told Me is the truth.
I really wanted to get into People's History cause it was recommended to me a bunch...but when I finally got into reading it I was disappointed. It's a good counterbalance to the bullshyt mainstream history, but he fills it with a lot of his own biases and doesn't use as many primary sources so it's hard to figure out what's the truth and what's just his gloss on shyt. The kinda book where if you're primed to like it you'll eat it up, if you're primed to be skeptical you'll throw it away. I like the idea but wish he would have written it in a way that it can be used better to counter the dominant narrative and not just preach to the choir.
Damn man that a refreshing comment to reply to. Nice thoughts.just thought of something on lies my teacher told me, when hes talking about woodrow wilson and helen keller, how we shouldnt whitewash people like basically maybe im reading it wrong but he implies socialism is a negative and they hid it to protect hellen kellers image, but i dont know if i agree, i think they hide the fact that a ton of people that are now heros were socialists, mlk jr for example, its because theyve erased the socialist history of this country completly, even the fact we dont celebrate mayday but it started here but thats when the world celebrates it. thats one reason i like peoples history, yes its dudes opinion but more so it gives you the socialist perspective that is completly missing from the textbooks. i mean you mentioned it mainstream narrative. where as lies is trying to make an overall point and uses certain instances in history but its not really a complete retelling, though the reconstruction stuff is great and much better than anything in peoples history. but both two of my favorites, but what is your opinion on that? did they hide helen keller or someone like mlk jr being a socialist to protect them or more so to erase any reference to socialism in America so people just assume its this foreign thing here and we have no history of it and its evil ?
just to gain more knowledge, learn more about the world and about yourself, etc
Written by James Louwen, the same dude who wrote Lies My Teacher Told MeSundown Towns