Hazel Brown
All Star
I highly disagree. There are foundational things that determine compatibility that doesn’t change.
What does a submissive woman do for her alpha man in a romantic dynamic?
- Thread starter Dad
- Start date
immature way of thinking . you older and wiser than that breh
you should learn to appreciate the proactivity or initiative somebody is exemplifying by doing something you like despite you not asking for it.
damn, ppl are really jaded and fukked nowadays
foundational for sure, things in relation to values and all that. I 100% agree
however if we keeping it a stack, we both know a lot of people speak about compatibility in for more finicky ways
its not just about values though...what matters are agreeableness, openness , conscientiousness and sanguineness. If two people are those 4 things, it can mitigate any issues that a lack of compatibility presents.
yup. nikkas like @O.T.I.S. apparently
its shameful
I've never been that way. I've always been the type to appreciate the smallest things. shyt, my girl the other day took my laundry out the dryer and folded it for me. That tiny shyt alone is very meaningful to me because she didnt have to do it yet still took an extra 5 mins to do so instead of just throwing the clothing on the bed for me to fold it.
I dont look down on women or parrots.Simply for having that be one of their functions by design#ThisIsTheirNature. Generally speaking,women are emotional beings. Would you not agree that can be a positive attribute?
But,it can also be negative. Womens emotions make them victim of fleeting belief systems. Women will easily change their views temporarily,and even their sexual orientation based on their emotions at any given time. Change the race of men they find attractive based on emotions. Change beliefs and religions based on the man they are dating at the time.
But this is a beautiful aspect of a woman. Because it allows her to be "submissive" and mold to her man. Its a weakness in the wrong environment,on social media,with bad exploitative men,in a circle full of single hellhound friends.
Neo. The Only. The One.
THE ONE
I hate myself cause I watched this and went back to watch the other video to see if maybe there was some way to make them fit together.
There's not.
Only thing I can say is this takes me back to something my OG told me a long time ago. Don't believe what women say cause women lie. Either she's lying now or she was lying then.
I'm leaning towards her lying then cause she wouldn't lie and say she is doing all these things for Cam when he's obviously going to see this video and if it's cap, he'll hit her with the
Nah she was capping in the other video when she said she would never do all of this. The second the right man got in her life (could be right financially, sex wise or otherwise), she switched up.
This is why I never pay attention when women lay out the things they don't like. They don't like men under 6 feet, they don't like this kind of man or that kind.
Truth of the matter is... us men can get women to switch up in a heartbeat if it's the right man.
Cam got this woman to switch up her entire outlook on life. She don't even seem like the same women. In this video, she a loudmouth thot. In the other one, she all quiet and zen.
Neo. The Only. The One.
THE ONE
Yep. When a woman genuinely likes you, she'll start molding herself into what she knows you want. My woman even talks like me now. Says words and phrases that I say.
For all these women in here saying they hate being "submissive" to men (looking at you @Booksnrain), it always trips me out cause I know that women are naturally submissive when they find the right man. They can't help but be, because it's their nature.
But like you said, it's bad if she does it for the wrong man. This is how pimps have women out on the hoe stroll. A lot of those women weren't hoes until they got with a pimp who made them that way and convinced them to do it.
It's a lot easier for men to convince women to do things that we want them to do than they realize. Its because like you said, they are led by emotions and their nature is to look for a man to lead them, whether they want to realize that or not.
They just have to be careful to not get led by the wrong man. If she's being led by a man who genuinely loves her and wants nothing but the best for her, she'll be good.
NobodyReally
Superstar
Kinda sad. Y'all really want doormats like this to model being a woman for your daughters?
A.) Stop obsessing over submission. It’s weird and psychologically indicative of other mental issues.
B.) It’s not submission ya’ll talking about. It’s literally cooperation and simple communication and cooperation. Which is fine when it’s reciprocal. Meaning men and women do these things for each other.
C.) Weird mentally ill dudes took that concept and warped it b/c they feel powerless in their daily lives and so their online obsession is about obtaining power which is NOT what healthy relationships are about.
D.) People that constantly bytch about it, more than likely aint about it. Instead of trying to brow beat women into cooperating with you while saying dumb shyt like “DEY NEED TO SUBMIT!”, but having absolutely nothing to submit to-men in this rut just need to do better and move with chicks aligned with them b/c they look goofy bytching about what they not getting and the bytching is part of the reason they not getting it in the first place.
It actually quite simple. No need to act like I hate cooperative dynamics between men and women. I’m actually trying to put some of these weirdos on game. You always get more bees with honey but dudes stay with the vinegar courtship and be mad when it don’t work out.
Neo. The Only. The One.
THE ONE
A.) Stop obsessing over submission. It’s weird and psychologically indicative of other mental issues.
B.) It’s not submission ya’ll talking about. It’s literally cooperation and simple communication and cooperation. Which is fine when it’s reciprocal. Meaning men and women do these things for each other.
C.) Weird mentally ill dudes took that concept and warped it b/c they feel powerless in their daily lives and so their online obsession is about obtaining power which is NOT what healthy relationships are about.
D.) People that constantly bytch about it, more than likely aint about it. Instead of trying to brow beat women into cooperating with you while saying dumb shyt like “DEY NEED TO SUBMIT!”, but having absolutely nothing to submit to-men in this rut just need to do better and move with chicks aligned with them b/c they look goofy bytching about what they not getting and the bytching is part of the reason they not getting it in the first place.
So angry. You need a hug, friend.
Reread what I said and stop making a straw man out of me. Your response addresses nothing that I said. You're addressing other people's talking points. If you're going to quote me, you could at least respond to what I said.
I’m only quoting you b/c you mentioned me with a misunderstanding of what I said. I just gave you some general guidelines about how this “submission” convo has been worn out and some psychological understanding behind it.So angry. You need a hug, friend.
Reread what I said and stop making a straw man out of me. Your response addresses nothing that I said. You're addressing other people's talking points. If you're going to quote me, you could at least respond to what I said.
Also the ad hominem attacks don’t work. I’m never angry when I’m educating the masses.
But sometimes dudes get triggered and try to deflect their frustration onto me.
But beyond all that. Did you understand my points?
If you did, cool. If you didn’t, let me know. If you did and you disagree, no worries. We agree to disagree.
(Walks away whistling).
Neo. The Only. The One.
THE ONE
I’m only quoting you b/c you mentioned me with a misunderstanding of what I said. I just gave you some general guidelines about how this “submission” convo has been worn out and some psychological understanding behind it.
Also the ad hominem attacks don’t work. I’m never angry when I’m educating the masses.
But sometimes dudes get triggered and try to deflect their frustration onto me.
But beyond all that. Did you understand my points?
If you did, cool. If you didn’t, let me know. If you did and you disagree, no worries. We agree to disagree.
(Walks away whistling).
Saying someone is angry is not an ad hominem attack.
You're addressing points that I've never said. If you're going to talk to me about a topic, don't bring up supposed worn out topics that you've heard said by other men. They don't speak for me. I've been very clear on what my views are.
A. You said I should stop obsessing over submission. Where's the obsession? I came in a thread on this topic, the first thread on this topic in a very long time. Nobody here is obsessing over submission. You're acting as if there's a new thread on this every day, when there's not.
B. No, it's not reciprocation that I'm talking about, even though I don't have a problem with that either. But there's a stark difference between reciprocation and submission. When a woman is submissive to a man, she follows his lead and his plan.
C. It may very well be that mentally ill guys are attempting to warp the term submission but I don't know anything about that. Unless you are saying you feel that I'm mentally ill.
D. Again, you are arguing a point that I've never made. Who's constantly talking about it? Not me. And if someone else is, that's not me. Talk to me about what I said. Who is trying to brow beat women? Again, you're arguing with another person instead of addressing me.
Accusing someone of being angry to detract from what they are saying is juvenile. That can stop there.Saying someone is angry is not an ad hominem attack.
You're addressing points that I've never said. If you're going to talk to me about a topic, don't bring up supposed worn out topics that you've heard said by other men. They don't speak for me. I've been very clear on what my views are.
A. You said I should stop obsessing over submission. Where's the obsession? I came in a thread on this topic, the first thread on this topic in a very long time. Nobody here is obsessing over submission. You're acting as if there's a new thread on this every day, when there's not.
B. No, it's not reciprocation that I'm talking about, even though I don't have a problem with that either. But there's a stark difference between reciprocation and submission. When a woman is submissive to a man, she follows his lead and his plan.
C. It may very well be that mentally ill guys are attempting to warp the term submission but I don't know anything about that. Unless you are saying you feel that I'm mentally ill.
D. Again, you are arguing a point that I've never made. Who's constantly talking about it? Not me. And if someone else is, that's not me. Talk to me about what I said. Who is trying to brow beat women? Again, you're arguing with another person instead of addressing me.
Secondly, twice you put words into my mouth and attempted to misrepresent my stance when I’ve been very clear on my thoughts on this stuff. First you alluded to me thinking men don’t deserve affection and secondly that I had an issue with submission.
So obviously you required clarification on my stances on the matter which I provided.
Do you agree with what I said? If that doesn’t reflect your own stance, tell me why. Or not.
No skin off my back either way.
Edit: I don’t think you specifically are mentally ill but many are hijacking these conversations for their own issues and men need to be aware of how they come off when the “submission” conversation comes up…which should never be a thing.
