010101
C L O N E*0690//////
HA*I’d take him on the hawks
HA*I’d take him on the hawks
Look at your post and then look at what you said earlier. Then look at what I said.
He wasn’t a bad defender. I never said he was all world.
And what does “defensive schemes that covered for him“ mean? What did the Bulls do to cover for Kerr? They never doubled anyone, so explain it.
So when you said “defensive schemes to cover for him,” you were talking bullshyt. Just to be clear.I can say the same "look at my post" on how the Suns were better offensively/defensively when Bol was on court vs when he was off at the same time he produced better than anyone else at his position. This player gets benched and yet you're still confused on why people think there's politicking going on behind the scenes?
![]()
Kerr was a bad defender bruh. Slow/unathletic, probably didn't have a great wingspan, short, lightweight etc... None of his stats show him even being average and if you look at his first years vs when he was with the bulls you'll see his steals/defensive analytic numbers peaked when he was playing with the Bulls. He was playing for an all time HOF coach and alongside 3 top 10 defenders of all time in Rodman, MJ, and Pippen. If I have to explain how playing with THREE all time HOF level defenders could cover weaker defenders deficiencies then we shouldn't even even be discussing basketballl...
I wonder why you're turning this into a "Steve Kerr has defense" thread instead of the actual topic?So when you said “defensive schemes to cover for him,” you were talking bullshyt. Just to be clear.
I actually pointed out the analytics saying he was a bad defender, that immediately "improved" the moment he joined the Bulls. But we should ignore what the numbers say so we can comfortably go by the word of his coach? I mean it's not like a coach would ever push out a positive spin when it comes to analyzing/criticizing his own players in public right?Your evidence that Kerr was a bad defender is, "trust me, bro" while dismissing what Phil Jackson said.
This is my last reply, but me pointing out that you don’t know what you are talking about regarding Steve Kerr the player is why another reason why your views on Bol Bol should be dismissed. You fundamentally don’t know what you are talking about. No amount ofI wonder why you're turning this into a "Steve Kerr has defense" thread instead of the actual topic?3 top 10 of all time defenders, who each are arguably the best defenders of all time at their position, can't cover up a defensive liability? I wonder why the Mavs always pushed to surround Luka's bad defense with good defenders?
I actually pointed out the analytics saying he was a bad defender, that immediately "improved" the moment he joined the Bulls. But we should ignore what the numbers say so we can comfortably go by the word of his coach? I mean it's not like a coach would ever push out a positive spin when it comes to analyzing/criticizing his own players in public right?
This isn't a "was Steve Kerr a good defender" thread, but that's easier to play dumb about then actually answering why a team would bench their best performer at a position (that the team performed better with on offense and defense) if there wasnt some behind the scenes politic type stuff going on.
This is my last reply, but me pointing out that you don’t know what you are talking about regarding Steve Kerr the player is why another reaso
your views on Bol Bol should be dismissed.
@Everythingg getting cooked the last like 7 pages![]()
because there's no actual point anymoreDawn: "How the hell could you think they're politickin with Bol"
A: Well he outperformed everyone at his position, the team played better on offense and defense when he was on the court vs when he was off, yet he still somehow got benched out the rotation....
Dawn: Uhh, uhh, uhhh....You got cooked!!!
Guess its easier to shake pom poms then actually addressing what's been said![]()
because there's no actual point anymore