What exactly about the Coli attracts alt-right trolls?
- Thread starter VegasCAC
- Start date
- Status
Trolls are useless to my ignore button
southpawstyle
Superstar
If thats how a general audience really feels about thecoli what do you think chances are Feds watchin?
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
The American
Defending America against cacs
Hey moderator, I thought memes weren't allowed, yet you're letting The_One spam this thread with right wing memes.
Plus, Idk why you deleted a post supporting Black Nationalism. Unreal what is allowed vs what gets deleted. People literally posting videos from Rebel Media, yet left-wing memes and Black Nationalist support is not allowed.
I hope the brehs here keep fighting off the altrighters, they are causing longtime quality posters to give up and leave. VVD may never return. Hulk Hogan looks worn out from this constant nonsense. Napoleon was right in that we're losing a unique and special corner of the internet. It looks like HL won't ever be the same again.
And it isn't about "being intolerant to alternative viewpoints", there is right and wrong, and you right wingers do know you're in the wrong, but you're having a ball irritating us which is sad and immature.
Plus, Idk why you deleted a post supporting Black Nationalism. Unreal what is allowed vs what gets deleted. People literally posting videos from Rebel Media, yet left-wing memes and Black Nationalist support is not allowed.
I hope the brehs here keep fighting off the altrighters, they are causing longtime quality posters to give up and leave. VVD may never return. Hulk Hogan looks worn out from this constant nonsense. Napoleon was right in that we're losing a unique and special corner of the internet. It looks like HL won't ever be the same again.
And it isn't about "being intolerant to alternative viewpoints", there is right and wrong, and you right wingers do know you're in the wrong, but you're having a ball irritating us which is sad and immature.
There was a pic on election night of trump on thecoli....
If thats how a general audience really feels about thecoli what do you think chances are Feds watchin?
Reading our live reaction thread
Simple. It's a mass gathering of Blacks. Lol.
southpawstyle
Superstar
There was a pic on election night of trump on thecoli....
Reading our live reaction thread
Not to go all kingsmen on yall or anything, but is the agent talk real?
Who do we trust!?
It's a mass gathering of blacks; I'm sure authorities of some jurisdiction are aware of / monitor this site.Not to go all kingsmen on yall or anything, but is the agent talk real?
Who do we trust!?
Frankly i dont see the problem...if anything its you liberals and low information militants who seem to be suffering from some kind of distorted perception disorder...
you lot seem to say "fukk reality..let me substitute it with my feelings"....If somone dont fall in line with the group-think youre a Cac,c00n or an Agent( Like anyone would pay to infiltrate this place
but i digress)
The trouble with the groupthink is its being done by by the lowest common denominator...
and as far as racism i seem to notice nobody produced any real examples...because 99% what they call racism is basically their hurt feelings...
imma let yall
tho
you lot seem to say "fukk reality..let me substitute it with my feelings"....If somone dont fall in line with the group-think youre a Cac,c00n or an Agent( Like anyone would pay to infiltrate this place
but i digress)The trouble with the groupthink is its being done by by the lowest common denominator...
and as far as racism i seem to notice nobody produced any real examples...because 99% what they call racism is basically their hurt feelings...
imma let yall
tho
Last edited:
southpawstyle
Superstar
Imagine them trying to reconcile all the ridiculous opposing views on display here.
"Well Sir, this TLR forum has some emotionally unstable posters. We should keep an eye on them. And this poster in the booth said he would ride or die for Soldier Boy, so we should keep tabs on him. And this letteragency fellow seems to be willing to die for Mrs. Clinton. Track that guy also."
The American
Defending America against cacs
More to the point on this disinformation campaign we're dealing with from these trolls:
Modern propaganda works by getting you to believe nothing. It's like lowering the defenses of your immune system. If they can get you to believe that all the news is propaganda, then all of a sudden propaganda from foreign-controlled state media or sourceless loony toon rants from domestic kooks, are all on an equal playing field with real investigative journalism. If everything is fake, your news consumption is just a dietary choice. And it's different messages for different audiences - carefully tailored. To one audience they say all news is fake, to those who are on their way to conversion they say "Trust only these sources." To those who might be open to skepticism, they just say "Hey isn't it troubling that the media is a business?"
Hannah Arendt, who studied all the different fascist movements (not just the Nazis) noted that:
In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and nothing was true. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.
The philosopher Sartre said this about the futility of arguing with a certain group in his time. See if any of this sounds familiar to you:
____ have chosen hate because hate is a faith to them; at the outset they have chosen to devaluate words and reasons. How entirely at ease they feel as a result. How futile and frivolous discussions appear to them. If out of courtesy they consent for a moment to defend their point of view, they lend themselves but do not give themselves. They try simply to project their intuitive certainty onto the plane of discourse.
Never believe that ______ are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The ____ have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors.
They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. If then, as we have been able to observe, the ____ is impervious to reason and to experience, it is not because his conviction is strong. Rather his conviction is strong because he has chosen first of all to be impervious.
He was talking about arguing with anti-Semites and Vichyists in the 1940s.
This style of arguing is familiar to anyone who has seen what has happened to HL lately.
Ever see someone post something that is quite completely false, with a second person posting a long reply with sources, only to have the original poster respond "libcuck tears"? One side is talking about facts but the other is playing a game.
Just look at what happened to "Fake News." This is a word that was born about 9 weeks ago. It lived for about 2 weeks as a genuine English word, meaning headlines fabricated to get clicks on Facebook, engineered by SEO wizards who weren't even American, just taking advantage of the election news wave:
"You Won't Believe Obama's Plan To Declare Martial Law!"
"Hillary Has Lung, Brain, Stomach, And Ass Cancer - SIX WEEKS TO LIVE!"
For a while, it seemed like the real world could agree that a word existed and had meaning, that it referred to a thing. Then the word was promptly murdered. Now, as we can clearly see, anyone who disagrees with a piece of news - even if it is NEWS, not an editorial - feels free to call it "Fake News." Trump calls CNN fake news.
There is a two step process to this degeneration. First, one gets an audience to believe that all news is agenda-driven and editorial (this was already achieved long ago). Second, now one says that all news that is embarrassing to your side must be editorial and fabricated.
Modern propaganda works by getting you to believe nothing. It's like lowering the defenses of your immune system. If they can get you to believe that all the news is propaganda, then all of a sudden propaganda from foreign-controlled state media or sourceless loony toon rants from domestic kooks, are all on an equal playing field with real investigative journalism. If everything is fake, your news consumption is just a dietary choice. And it's different messages for different audiences - carefully tailored. To one audience they say all news is fake, to those who are on their way to conversion they say "Trust only these sources." To those who might be open to skepticism, they just say "Hey isn't it troubling that the media is a business?"
Hannah Arendt, who studied all the different fascist movements (not just the Nazis) noted that:
In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and nothing was true. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.
The philosopher Sartre said this about the futility of arguing with a certain group in his time. See if any of this sounds familiar to you:
____ have chosen hate because hate is a faith to them; at the outset they have chosen to devaluate words and reasons. How entirely at ease they feel as a result. How futile and frivolous discussions appear to them. If out of courtesy they consent for a moment to defend their point of view, they lend themselves but do not give themselves. They try simply to project their intuitive certainty onto the plane of discourse.
Never believe that ______ are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The ____ have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors.
They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. If then, as we have been able to observe, the ____ is impervious to reason and to experience, it is not because his conviction is strong. Rather his conviction is strong because he has chosen first of all to be impervious.
He was talking about arguing with anti-Semites and Vichyists in the 1940s.
This style of arguing is familiar to anyone who has seen what has happened to HL lately.
Ever see someone post something that is quite completely false, with a second person posting a long reply with sources, only to have the original poster respond "libcuck tears"? One side is talking about facts but the other is playing a game.
Just look at what happened to "Fake News." This is a word that was born about 9 weeks ago. It lived for about 2 weeks as a genuine English word, meaning headlines fabricated to get clicks on Facebook, engineered by SEO wizards who weren't even American, just taking advantage of the election news wave:
"You Won't Believe Obama's Plan To Declare Martial Law!"
"Hillary Has Lung, Brain, Stomach, And Ass Cancer - SIX WEEKS TO LIVE!"
For a while, it seemed like the real world could agree that a word existed and had meaning, that it referred to a thing. Then the word was promptly murdered. Now, as we can clearly see, anyone who disagrees with a piece of news - even if it is NEWS, not an editorial - feels free to call it "Fake News." Trump calls CNN fake news.
There is a two step process to this degeneration. First, one gets an audience to believe that all news is agenda-driven and editorial (this was already achieved long ago). Second, now one says that all news that is embarrassing to your side must be editorial and fabricated.
Frankly i dont see the problem...if anything its you liberals and low information militants who seem to be suffering from some kind of distorted perception disorder...
you lot seem to say "fukk reality..let me substitute it with my feelings"....If somone dont fall in line with the group-think youre a Cac,c00n or an Agent( Like anyone would pay to infiltrate this place
The trouble with the groupthink its being done by by the lowest common denominator...
and as far as racism i seem to notice nobody produced any real examples...because 99% what they call racism is basically their hurt feelings...
imma let yall
tho
I was going respond but nah.....
DlAMONDZ
That pu$$y got me grinning
Calling out alt-right trolls = being a liberal on thecoli rofl
- Status