And replace it with?Who supports that? I say throw the ACA in the bushes altogether.
And replace it with?Who supports that? I say throw the ACA in the bushes altogether.
How can we forget the Ground Zero Mosque incident where some Christians and Jews, along with "little government" right-wingers begged the government to stop a private sale between parties because Muslims wanted to be build a recreation center.
"Freedom of Religion *1"
-------------------------------------------
*1 Warning, may not apply to religions outside of the Judeo-Christian belief system. Exclusions apply. Please see your local legislature to determine the authenticity of your religion. You may be eligible for 1st amendment rights upon conversion.
When you begin mandating civilian purchases rather than using the tax money collected, you are bound to have all sorts of f*ckery, hypocrisy, and balderdash.The problem with your victory dance is religion can broadly determine what is deemed a violation to their beliefs.
This ruling might cause a slippery slope in the context of what is deemed violation of religious freedom from a business standpoint.
What if a Black cultural nationalist organization such as the Nation of Islam or the Black Israelites claimed that they possessed a "religious freedom" to actively discriminate against white people in the workplace or elsewhere?
When you remove cancer from your body, what do you replace it with?And replace it with?
When you remove cancer from your body, what do you replace it with?
Nothing.
but thats not realistic, so i'd say either a single payer system, or govt option. The latter being what I would support.
So you'd support a Govt option (basically an addition to the ACA) over a single payer system? So why are you against the ACA then?![]()
huh?Did you just compare the public option to the ACA?
When you begin mandating civilian purchases rather than using the tax money collected, you are bound to have all sorts of f*ckery, hypocrisy, and balderdash.
A single payer system > obamacare.
When you begin mandating civilian purchases rather than using the tax money collected, you are bound to have all sorts of f*ckery, hypocrisy, and balderdash.
A single payer system > obamacare.
I'm rethinking my position nowMy god, we agree.
The world might burn.
Like you'd EVER support a single payerWhen you begin mandating civilian purchases rather than using the tax money collected, you are bound to have all sorts of f*ckery, hypocrisy, and balderdash.
A single payer system > obamacare.
If I had a choice no, but we've reached a point where its either single payer or abominationcare... and its not even a tough decision. Single payer is better in every way.<---- this should tell you how bad obamacare is.Like you'd EVER support a single payer![]()
there's no such thing as choiceIf I had a choice no, but we've reached a point where its either single payer or abominationcare... and its not even a tough decision. Single payer is better in every way.<---- this should tell you how bad obamacare is.
I will say that I'd like to see a single payer implemented without restrictions on private practices, but that's unlikely.