What if the fastest American athletes did track?

T.he I.nformant

1st Ballot HOF Teller
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
12,855
Reputation
3,003
Daps
43,131
Reppin
Wherever nikkas need to be told on
tumblr_lrjhiofp841r3opg1o1_250.gif


Or :camby:
 

mamba

Veteran
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
18,062
Reputation
3,395
Daps
88,857
Reppin
Underdeveloped Minds Research Institute
breh, reread usain bolt ran 20.60 as a 15 yr old, 21:15 aint shyt for a collegiate

21:15 is nice for someone who hadn't run track for four years!

As a matter of fact, he shaved 0:80 sec off his 200m time without any track activities from 15-18!

You want us to believe Bolt can shave his time, but Moss wouldn't have been able to? :dahell:

Both are elite athletes and freaks of nature.
 

mamba

Veteran
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
18,062
Reputation
3,395
Daps
88,857
Reppin
Underdeveloped Minds Research Institute
How tough is 10 seconds? The first time anyone did it was 1968, 48 years ago. In 48 years, only 119 people have run 100m faster than 10 seconds. Nobody from the entire continent of South America has broken the 10 second barrier.

Compare that to the gold standard of middle distance running, the 4 minute mile. 5 high school runners from the United States have broken 4 minutes. There are athletes over 40 who have broken 4 minutes. Well over 1,000 people have run a mile faster than 4 minutes, and virtually every professional miler can go under 4, whereas only a handful of sprinters at any given time can go under 10.

This isn't to belittle middle distance runners, but to give you an idea of just how much importance physical talent plays in the ability to sprint very fast - some people, no matter how hard they work, will never run a 10 second 100m sprint.

I agree. It is not easy. But, the US has had a few non-track athletes that, with the right focused trainig from an early age, would have been right there in the conversation.

Randy Moss is one of them.

In bum ass West Virginia, do you think a broke ass family was going to have their 6'4" phenom focusing on track or basketball/football/baseball?

No one is saying NFL speedsters could drop football today and be competing at an Olympic level tomorrow.

We're simply saying that if they'd dedicated their lives to track, like Bolt did, from an early age, chances are many of them would be Olympic-level sprinters.

The reverse is true for Bolt. Had he dedicated his life to football, given his physical advantages, I have no doubt he would have been an elite receiver like Randy Moss or Calvin Johnson.

Check this out: Top 100 meter times by NFL players
 
Last edited:

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,914
Reputation
4,172
Daps
104,649
Stupid idiots acting like track & field isn't a HUGE NCAA sport with the best athletes in the nation :snoop:


Oh really?


When is that even in TV? :heh:


What are their TV ratings for their championships?
How much money is given by boosters to direct players to certain schools?
How much grade fixing occurs?


Pretty sure it's all miniscule compared to the important sports that take athletes away from track.
 

mamba

Veteran
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
18,062
Reputation
3,395
Daps
88,857
Reppin
Underdeveloped Minds Research Institute
Oh really?


When is that even in TV? :heh:


What are their TV ratings for their championships?
How much money is given by boosters to direct players to certain schools?
How much grade fixing occurs?


Pretty sure it's all miniscule compared to the important sports that take athletes away from track.

Lol! These people are really trying to claim that all the people who should be running track ARE running track in the United States.

We don't have top US heavyweights anymore because most of them get shoved into football, baseball or basketball at an early age.

We don't produce the sprinters we once did because they are playing basketball or football.
 

filial_piety

Banned
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
11,107
Reputation
-2,790
Daps
27,499
Reppin
I95S
I'm sure you could take one of those wide receivers or whoever and train him to be faster than Bolt :patrice:
It's a tough call...I mean none of the fastest players in NFL history have ever been known to run under 10 seconds...BUT the idea is that if they were professionally trained and dedicated....could one of them actually had been the fastest in the world in the 100m? Maybe...

There are ALOT of WR's and RB's that have run under 10.5 in the 100m (and that is VERY FAST...don't let the Olympic times confuse you) Historically off the top of my head, based on their 40 yrd and 100 m times I think these guys could actually get under 10 seconds with the training....BUT not necessarily faster than Bolt...Bolt is such an anomaly that I don't know how anyone with ease could even say that...his 100m is almost imaginably impossible.

Anyway, off the top of my head..and I'm sure there are plenty of modern day ones to add, but here they are ....

Hershel Walker
Deion Sanders
WillieGault
James Jett
Randy Moss
Levernius Coles
Bo Jackson
Don Bebe
Mile Vick
Warrick Dunn

EDIT add Darrel Green to that list...he's arguably the fastest in NFL history


Now these guys might not beat Bolt in a race with the training....but atleast 3 of them could possibly be faster than anyone else
 
Last edited:

EffedUp

Pugs get lonely too...
Supporter
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
3,901
Reputation
817
Daps
13,312
Reppin
Cincinnati, OH
Man, I see Bolt's success really got some brehs in their feelings. :pachaha:
Just accept that he's a once in a lifetime athlete. Now that he's retiring, the U.S. has a chance to reclaim their throne in track. Be patient brehs.
 

The American

Defending America against cacs
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
3,623
Reputation
-748
Daps
6,497
You want us to believe Bolt can shave his time, but Moss wouldn't have been able to? :dahell:
.
No he wouldn't have. I fukked w Moss heavy in his Min days, he didn't have it in him to beat Atl in 1999, he wouldn't have it in him to surpass Usain.
I agree. It is not easy. But, the US has had a few non-track athletes that, with the right focused trainig from an early age, would have been right there in the conversation.

Randy Moss is one of them.

In bum ass West Virginia, do you think a broke ass family was going to have their 6'4" phenom focusing on track or basketball/football/baseball?

No one is saying NFL speedsters could drop football today and be competing at an Olympic level tomorrow.

We're simply saying that if they'd dedicated their lives to track, like Bolt did, from an early age, chances are many of them would be Olympic-level sprinters.

The reverse is true for Bolt. Had he dedicated his life to football, given his physical advantages, I have no doubt he would have been an elite receiver like Randy Moss or Calvin Johnson.

Check this out: Top 100 meter times by NFL players
This is so idiotic, your argument is nothing but fantasy that opens a can of spastic worms. So then Messi would be the GOAT PG if he focused on that. Lennox Lewis woulda been the GOAT PF. You're arguing like a white boy.
Lol! These people are really trying to claim that all the people who should be running track ARE running track in the United States.
They are. Didn't u compete in school. We find out our specialty at an early age. You know absolutely nothing.

We don't have top US heavyweights anymore because most of them get shoved into football, baseball or basketball at an early age.

We don't produce the sprinters we once did because they are playing basketball or football.
You are retarded, those are not the reasons. The reasons are because not enough boxers or sprinters have been good enough, not a single athlete in another discipline could have crossed over successfully. So I guess Somalia doesn't dominate all sports because their strongest/fastest fight in wars instead. Jamaica would dominate in EVERYTHING if nikkas didn't get shoved into normal jobs instead. Those are facts. Per capita, Jamaica is superior. If their economy allowed for better training, it'd be a wash for all events.
 
Top