breh, reread usain bolt ran 20.60 as a 15 yr old, 21:15 aint shyt for a collegiate

How tough is 10 seconds? The first time anyone did it was 1968, 48 years ago. In 48 years, only 119 people have run 100m faster than 10 seconds. Nobody from the entire continent of South America has broken the 10 second barrier.
Compare that to the gold standard of middle distance running, the 4 minute mile. 5 high school runners from the United States have broken 4 minutes. There are athletes over 40 who have broken 4 minutes. Well over 1,000 people have run a mile faster than 4 minutes, and virtually every professional miler can go under 4, whereas only a handful of sprinters at any given time can go under 10.
This isn't to belittle middle distance runners, but to give you an idea of just how much importance physical talent plays in the ability to sprint very fast - some people, no matter how hard they work, will never run a 10 second 100m sprint.
Stupid idiots acting like track & field isn't a HUGE NCAA sport with the best athletes in the nation![]()

Oh really?
When is that even in TV?
What are their TV ratings for their championships?
How much money is given by boosters to direct players to certain schools?
How much grade fixing occurs?
Pretty sure it's all miniscule compared to the important sports that take athletes away from track.
It's a tough call...I mean none of the fastest players in NFL history have ever been known to run under 10 seconds...BUT the idea is that if they were professionally trained and dedicated....could one of them actually had been the fastest in the world in the 100m? Maybe...I'm sure you could take one of those wide receivers or whoever and train him to be faster than Bolt![]()

No he wouldn't have. I fukked w Moss heavy in his Min days, he didn't have it in him to beat Atl in 1999, he wouldn't have it in him to surpass Usain.You want us to believe Bolt can shave his time, but Moss wouldn't have been able to?
.
This is so idiotic, your argument is nothing but fantasy that opens a can of spastic worms. So then Messi would be the GOAT PG if he focused on that. Lennox Lewis woulda been the GOAT PF. You're arguing like a white boy.I agree. It is not easy. But, the US has had a few non-track athletes that, with the right focused trainig from an early age, would have been right there in the conversation.
Randy Moss is one of them.
In bum ass West Virginia, do you think a broke ass family was going to have their 6'4" phenom focusing on track or basketball/football/baseball?
No one is saying NFL speedsters could drop football today and be competing at an Olympic level tomorrow.
We're simply saying that if they'd dedicated their lives to track, like Bolt did, from an early age, chances are many of them would be Olympic-level sprinters.
The reverse is true for Bolt. Had he dedicated his life to football, given his physical advantages, I have no doubt he would have been an elite receiver like Randy Moss or Calvin Johnson.
Check this out: Top 100 meter times by NFL players
They are. Didn't u compete in school. We find out our specialty at an early age. You know absolutely nothing.Lol! These people are really trying to claim that all the people who should be running track ARE running track in the United States.
You are retarded, those are not the reasons. The reasons are because not enough boxers or sprinters have been good enough, not a single athlete in another discipline could have crossed over successfully. So I guess Somalia doesn't dominate all sports because their strongest/fastest fight in wars instead. Jamaica would dominate in EVERYTHING if nikkas didn't get shoved into normal jobs instead. Those are facts. Per capita, Jamaica is superior. If their economy allowed for better training, it'd be a wash for all events.We don't have top US heavyweights anymore because most of them get shoved into football, baseball or basketball at an early age.
We don't produce the sprinters we once did because they are playing basketball or football.