What is a man's purpose if he's not supposed to be a provider?

[JudgeJoeForilla]

@Colicat the moral of the story is you shouldn't want your cake and expect to eat it too

I could see if this was the 60's and a woman needed her significant other to be a provider but we live in an era where women and men struggle alike and women and men also succeed alike financially that is

Back in the day the family format was pretty simple so it was expected a man lead and take care of the house hold. These days women are just as strong in the workforce as men are making just as much and in some cases way more than men are and are fully capable in providing for themselves which was my point from the start. No woman in 2016 should expect for a man to buy her shyt. I think it is women these days look at men as an ensurance policy they want to lead their own lives but when the going gets tough or things fall apart they want a mans realrces to fall back on so some women still promote this bull shyt about a man being a "provider" as a way to obligate/shame/attempt to force men into catering to a woman's needs even though she's not willing to submit.

 

[AlainLocke]

I don't agee here at all.

Why not...

Only relationship I am willing to have with someone that is my life partner is if they can provide for themselves.

Anybody other than that is a liability.

I am not gonna drag another grown ass person through life with me.

If you can't cook, clean, and get money...then I don't need you

I can pay someone to fukk me and pretend to like me and I can pay someone to have a baby. I can pay somebody to clean. I can pay someone to cook.

And in the long run they would be cheaper than a wife. And I probably be happier too...

What I want is companionship and people that need to be carried up the mountain ain't good companions.

If a woman ask me if she can provide for her and give her the life she want, she automatically get the

 

[Reflected]

@Colicat the moral of the story is you shouldn't want your cake and expect to eat it too

I could see if this was the 60's and a woman needed her significant other to be a provider but we live in an era where women and men struggle alike and women and men also succeed alike financially that is

Back in the day the family format was pretty simple so it was expected a man lead and take care of the house hold. These days women are just as strong in the workforce as men are making just as much and in some cases way more than men are and are fully capable in providing for themselves which was my point from the start. No woman in 2016 should expect for a man to buy her shyt. I thinks shy it is is women these days look at men as an ensurance policy they want to lead their own lives but when the going gets tough or things fall apart they want a mans realrces to fall back on so some women still promote this bull shyt about a man being a "provider" as a way to obligate/shame/attempt to force men into catering to a woman's needs even though she's not willing to submit.

Basically. It's funny because what you said was pro-feminism, I don't see how any female today would have an issue with what you said.

 

[Ashley Banks]

Yeah, I never understand that men HATE independent and career women but they also HATE spending money on women/taking care of women. Like what do they want? women to be homeless bums? This is an actual question, I really don't understand it.

 

[JudgeJoeForilla]

Yeah, I never understand that men HATE independent and career women but they also HATE spending money on women/taking care of women. Like what do they want? women to be homeless bums? This is an actual question, I really don't understand it.

The question is what do you want. Men don't have a problem with you doing you but don't expect to have a dude take care of you if you're fully capable and willing to take care of yourself, even saying willing is a reach, there are not too many excuses for most women in 2016 not being able to make their own way or possibly struggle to eventually make it just like men do.

 

[Ashley Banks]

The question is what do you want. Men don't have a problem with you doing you but don't expect to have a dude take care of you if you're fully capable and willingness to take care of yourself, even saying willing is a stretch not many excuses for women in 2016 not being able to make their own way or struggle to eventually make it just like men do.

I agree, everyone should be able to take care of themselves. I'm talking about the abundance of guys complaining about women that are independent then turning around complaining about women that want to be taken care of.

 

[(Lean Ambrose)]

So your stay at home wife would be a prostitue because she stays in a home that you paid for; In order to see her you have to pay the mortgage and light bill

:kobelol: Goodnight

Hell naw yo...

 

[AlainLocke]

I agree, everyone should be able to take care of themselves. I'm talking about the abundance of guys complaining about women that are independent then turning around complaining about women that want to be taken care of.

Men as a whole are dumb...

A lot of men still for some reason base their manliness or their masculinity on their ability to provide for a woman. And they'll intentionally seek out backwards ass women that want a man to do everything for them.

Yet these same men don't wanna feel taken advantage of...like a bytch...cause that's what it is essentially is...being someone's bytch...

So they'll be like...

"I need my woman to do what I say. Because I am the man of the house. She don't need to be blah blah blah..."

A lot of men don't understand, a woman getting her own money, having her own house, creating her own lifestyle...

IS EMANCIPATION FROM WOMEN.

In order to get love and sex and intimacy from a woman...you no longer have to give her money and a lifestyle that she desires...

It is an opportunity to live your life as you see fit without worrying about your masculinity because you don't got a kept bytch.

But they don't see it that way...cause they are stupid.

 

[Keep_It_Hip_Hop_Fam]

Cuddling

 

[Luna]

Mankind's purpose has always been to innovate or cultivate what has already been created. The world is divided between leaders and followers; innovators and cultivators. In this day and age that should not be gender specific. In fact, the majority of people have always been followers.I'm in no position to tell a man what his purpose in life is, as he can't tell me about mine. On the other hand, if you idealize traditional relationships between men and women, play your part and all is well.

Thinking about it, do we even have a purpose besides the pursuit of happiness, or at least a comfortable lifestyle?

 

[Taadow]

Riddle me this; what are you new aged "men" bringing to the table?

Fucc the table. I'm outside.

 

[RoGethoes]

Women have money now so relationships
Are and should be based solely on compatibility, why is that so hard for you fukkers to understand

 

[StickStickly]

Men as a whole are dumb...

A lot of men still for some reason base their manliness or their masculinity on their ability to provide for a woman. And they'll intentionally seek out backwards ass women that want a man to do everything for them.

Yet these same men don't wanna feel taken advantage of...like a bytch...cause that's what it is essentially is...being someone's bytch...

So they'll be like...

"I need my woman to do what I say. Because I am the man of the house. She don't need to be blah blah blah..."

A lot of men don't understand, a woman getting her own money, having her own house, creating her own lifestyle...

IS EMANCIPATION FROM WOMEN.

In order to get love and sex and intimacy from a woman...you no longer have to give her money and a lifestyle that she desires...

It is an opportunity to live your life as you see fit without worrying about your masculinity because you don't got a kept bytch.

But they don't see it that way...cause they are stupid.

 

[Ol’Otis]

women to be homeless bums

yes nikka

can't have these broads hardworking and independent

 

[Mowgli]

So a woman isn't supposed to be independent

AND she isn't supposed to depend on her partner for financial support?


Riddle me this; what are you new aged "men" bringing to the table?

What is a woman's purpose if she isn't domesticated?

You thinking to hard about this. Because we are in a nation and Era of abundance what your purpose and the men you attracts purpose will be different from person to person.

Men will always create and enforce laws to hold their collectives together at a minimum. They will always carry out plans to bring capital into their family or collective.

At a base level women will influence this man from behind the throne and assist men in refining and building their dreams and a small few will branch out on their own to make their own dreams happen but will always be under the umbrella of man's law.

What's your purpose? Figure it out