No, and I am going to let you slide on making my viewpoint sound extreme to undermine it. If your POV was strong you wouldn't have to rely to such cheap tricks. Where the fukk did I say castration is the only way to be emasculated???So you believe castration is the only way for a man to be emasculated.
You don't have the emotional/psychological strength to see a man in a skirt and not feel threatened, nor do you have the intellectual capacity to confront an opposing/different POV without hyperbole or theatrics. So it doesn't matter to me whether you accept my POV or not. I am just exposing the holes and weakness in your way of thinking.Rather extremebut since it adheres to the actual definition & you gave a logical answer I will accept your view point.
Heres a hard pill to swallow. If your son sees a dude in a dress and decides thats his wave too, he was probably a homo all along. And if you as a man are "sound and secure in your way of life", your son(s) will see that and follow the example you lead. But there is more to being a man than homophobia, flat sole shoes and pants. If some image of a dude on TV/the internet/a magazine cover has more sway over your son than you, you're nowhere near the man you claim to beThe rest of the post I thoroughly disagree with & is utter rubbish. Reason being is because of the boys you mentioned in this post. As men, we are sound and secure in our way of life...but our sons.Our boys aren't fully mature & can be easily manipulated into a life of being demonic. The Men of this world do not want this for our youth.

Everyone is wired differently. Hiding behind the farce of what's "natural" to project your morality as biology is another cheap trick. To me all the shyt I mentioned is weird as fukk. But at the end of the day, if everyone involved is a consenting adult, I dont have problems with it, cause the shyt doesnt affect meYou're right, they are not being emasculated, they are already emasculated. At that point it's a done deal, what you see is the finished product.
For example men's biological programming is to compete for females. No one in their right mind would deny this(I hope). Whether they're doing it in a direct, agressive "alpha" manner or in a "beta" manner(i.e: white knighting and simping) is irrelevant. The point is that they are competing for women, and more to the point, when they find a suitable woman they try and make her "theirs".
No one who hasn't experienced some serious brain rewiring would get off by seeing his woman fukked before their own eyes, by having the woman insult him and his manhood and all the other shyt that those in the cuckold community do.
If you're seeing your woman getting fukked by someone else before your veru eyes, the appropriate and natural reaction is to have your blood boiling and murder in your eyes.
If you're seeing your woman getting fukked by someone else and you're getting off when she tells you how much better he is than you or how his dikk is bigger or whatever, something is seriously wrong. That is not natural.
I'm not necesarilly saying there's a "system" or an "agenda" behind it, but something wrong had to have happened somewhere, whether by design or by happenstance, to make you that way.

You nikkas are so paranoid about this gay shyt that yall are going to end up creating a self fulfilling prophecy making your kids turn out gay![]()
Hahahaha.....
Coli nitwit: "SON, I KNOW YOU ARE ONLY TWO YEARS OLD, BUT I 'M ABOUT TO GIVE YOU A FIVE HOUR LECTURE ON RESISTING THE GAY AGENDA, SO YOU CAN EFFECTIVELY QUELL THE URGE OF WEARING DRESSES (EVEN TRADITIONAL AFRICAN WRAPS), HEELS, WATCHING ELLEN, AND STICKING A PENIS IN YOUR BUTTHOLE. THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT CONVERSATION WE WILL EVER HAVE...NOW SIT DOWN AND GET COMFORTABLE, AND DONT YOU DARE CROSS YOUR LEGS SON!!!!!!!!!
kid:
![]()

And saying "everyone is wired differently" is just a blanket statement. An excuse, and not a good one at that. Everyone is wired differently in superficial matters, but make no mistake about it, a great deal of our behaviour is biologically determined. That's why they speak of "lizard brains" and "monkey brains". There are always outliers, yes, but even those outliers exist only because of biological(hormonal) imbalances.Everyone is wired differently. Hiding behind the farce of what's "natural" to project your morality as biology is another cheap trick.
I don't care about what consenting adults do. I don't care that some dude wants to watch his wife getting fukked by another man and then "clean up".To me all the shyt I mentioned is weird as fukk. But at the end of the day, if everyone involved is a consenting adult, I dont have problems with it, cause the shyt doesnt affect me
Your reply was strawman after strawman, but this takes the cake. How the fukk would you know how I feel or don't feel about porn? I "accidentally" manage to mention the yourbrainonporn website and "casually" suggest that maybe they should check it out to almost all of the males I know. Why don't you just stick to the topic and leave it at that.I would bet porn has a far more damaging impact on kids than a dude in a skirt, but none of yall are for that cause. So stop trying to push your morality as some altruistic "for the kids" movement. When its not about homosexuality yall dont give a damn about kids, stop lying.
And saying "everyone is wired differently" is just a blanket statement. An excuse, and not a good one at that. Everyone is wired differently in superficial matters, but make no mistake about it, a great deal of our behaviour is biologically determined. That's why they speak of "lizard brains" and "monkey brains". There are always outliers, yes, but even those outliers exist only because of biological(hormonal) imbalances.
And who said anything about morality? I cast no moral judgements. I did not say "it's evil because it's unnatural". I just said it's unnatural. Because it is. Women behaving like men and men behaving like women is unnatural.
I don't care about what consenting adults do. I don't care that some dude wants to watch his wife getting fukked by another man and then "clean up".
But I do care about that behaviour becoming normalized. I do care about those who can't yet decide for themselves, and that choice being made for them.
You mentioned the word "consenting adult". I think that's interesting. If a kid spent his whole childhood and adolescence under the influence of feminist teachers, was diagnosed with a pseudo mental condition, was drugged with adderall because he had a "disorder"(which usually means he was just bored out of his mind, like kids are known to be). If he spent years watching TV shows and films where men are weak, stupid, incompetent buffons who are utterly dependent on women(who are beatiful, wise goddesses). If he is constantly getting called a potential rapist and constantly getting reminded all the ways in which his whole gender consists of sexist pigs and all the ways in which men are victimizing women. If he is testosterone deficient because of all the shyt in our food.
If all of that happened, if that's the way he was brought up and the only world he's ever known, he might one day decide that "hey, wearing a skirt is not such a bad thing". Or that jerking off while your s/o is getting gangbanged before your very eyes is not such a bad thing. We're all different after all.
So yeah, technically he's a "consenting adult". In practice however I don't see that he had much choice.
Just food for thought.
Your reply was strawman after strawman, but this takes the cake. How the fukk would you know how I feel or don't feel about porn? I "accidentally" manage to mention the yourbrainonporn website and "casually" suggest that maybe they should check it out to almost all of the males I know. Why don't you just stick to the topic and leave it at that.
The bolded is your opinion and dependent on the agreement that men and women have rigid behavioral patterns. Which contradicts the scenario below in which you show how external factors can change/influence one's behaviors. Show me some scientific proof that men and women have certain baseline behaviors that are only changed by outside influences please.And saying "everyone is wired differently" is just a blanket statement. An excuse, and not a good one at that. Everyone is wired differently in superficial matters, but make no mistake about it, a great deal of our behaviour is biologically determined. That's why they speak of "lizard brains" and "monkey brains". There are always outliers, yes, but even those outliers exist only because of biological(hormonal) imbalances.
And who said anything about morality? I cast no moral judgements. I did not say "it's evil because it's unnatural". I just said it's unnatural. Because it is. Women behaving like men and men behaving like women is unnatural.
Who the fukk is telling kids cuckolding is normal?I don't care about what consenting adults do. I don't care that some dude wants to watch his wife getting fukked by another man and then "clean up".
But I do care about that behaviour becoming normalized. I do care about those who can't yet decide for themselves, and that choice being made for them.
This is a pretty big hypothetical dependent on a lot of assumptions you have yet to provide any empirical proof for. One could easily string together a bunch of convenient hypotheticals to explain how outside influences they don't like may have warped your thinking. Doesn't mean that shyt makes any sense.You mentioned the term "consenting adult". I think that's interesting. If a kid spent his whole childhood and adolescence under the influence of feminist teachers, was diagnosed with a pseudo mental condition, was drugged with adderall because he had a "disorder"(which usually means he was just bored out of his mind, like kids are known to be). If he spent years watching TV shows and films where men are weak, stupid, incompetent buffons who are utterly dependent on women(who are beatiful, wise goddesses). If he is constantly getting called a potential rapist and constantly getting reminded all the ways in which his whole gender consists of sexist pigs and all the ways in which men are victimizing women. If he is testosterone deficient because of all the shyt in our food.
If all of that happened, if that's the way he was brought up and the only world he's ever known, he might one day decide that "hey, wearing a skirt is not such a bad thing". Or that jerking off while your s/o is getting gangbanged before your very eyes is not such a bad thing. We're all different after all.
So yeah, technically he's a "consenting adult". In practice however I don't see that he had much choice.
Funny, you mention it to every male you know, and yet this is the first time you have mentioned that site here. Won't go as far as to call you a liar, but it's obvious you have no problems stretching the truth to bolster your points, undermining everything you claim w/o proof. Point still stands... if you were really "bout that life", you wouldn't have waited until just now to bring up that site. You're not fooling anybody.Your reply was strawman after strawman, but this takes the cake. How the fukk would you know how I feel or don't feel about porn? I "accidentally" manage to mention the yourbrainonporn website and "casually" suggest that maybe they should check it out to almost all of the males I know. Why don't you just stick to the topic and leave it at that.



I'm sorry but only a blind man would debate this point. You don't think humans have naturally "rigid" behaviour patterns? What about man's aggression and desire to compete then? The thing that causes kidnergardeners to wrestle each other over toys is the same that made Alexander the Great, Chingis Khan and a thousand other conquerors raise armies and then go raping and pilaging.The bolded is your opinion and dependent on the agreement that men and women have rigid behavioral patterns. Which contradicts the scenario below in which you show how external factors can change/influence one's behaviors. Show me some scientific proof that men and women have certain baseline behaviors that are only changed by outside influences please.
Well, cuckolds for one.Who the fukk is telling kids cuckolding is normal?

I don't mean any disrespect, but if at this point you are not aware of any "empirical proof" that most modern men are testosterone deficient because of our food or what's happening to children in schools, there's really no point in us continuing this debate. We have no common ground.This is a pretty big hypothetical dependent on a lot of assumptions you have yet to provide any empirical proof for. One could easily string together a bunch of convenient hypotheticals to explain how outside influences they don't like may have warped your thinking. Doesn't mean that shyt makes any sense.
I'm not sure about tights, but powdered wigs arose because of STDs, mainly syphilis. Baldness spread throughout Europe. They looked the way the looked because of the obvious technological limitations of the times.Men have been dressing up like women and wearing feminine shyt for centuries.... be it the traditional wraps in Africa or the powdered wigs and tights of the Colonial era. Even in the last century there was a lot of androgyny and gender ambiguity. So the idea that this is some kind of new development is a little ridiculous. As are the ideas that one can stop their kids from being gay or that "manly men" have less influence over their kids than the media. You guys are talking yourselves in circles and making zero sense.
It's also the first time I adressed the issue of emasculation on here, so your accusation falls apart. Why do you keep trying to pigeonhole me into some sort of "anti-gay" camp, acting as if I'm an 'usual suspect' when this is literally the first time I've ever broached the subject? Again, just stick to the issue at hand.Funny, you mention it to every male you know, and yet this is the first time you have mentioned that site here. Won't go as far as to call you a liar, but it's obvious you have no problems stretching the truth to bolster your points, undermining everything you claim w/o proof. Point still stands... if you were really "bout that life", you wouldn't have waited until just now to bring up that site. You're not fooling anybody.![]()
Yes there is. The natural way. Naturally, females are warm and nurturing. Naturally, males are inquisitive, adventurous and aggressive/competitive.
You don't need an anthropological study to tell you this, just eyes and a functioning brain. Left to their own devices, little girls invariably gravitate towards dolls(which they "adopt" and become very attached to) or cute animals like puppies or kittens or rabbits. They treat the object of their affection(be it a doll or a kitten) like a mother, they play house etc.
Left to their own devices, little boys invariably prefer "violent" toys like plastic soldiers, water or bb guns, mock swords, robots, firecrackers or "adventurous" toys like cars, helicopters, planes, kites, skateboards etc.
They form packs and seek conflict with other packs, have hideouts and forts, they race bikes, they mock and fight each other etc.
We are biologically programmed this way.
No, and I am going to let you slide on making my viewpoint sound extreme to undermine it. If your POV was strong you wouldn't have to rely to such cheap tricks. Where the fukk did I say castration is the only way to be emasculated???
If some image of a dude on TV/the internet/a magazine cover has more sway over your son than you, you're nowhere near the man you claim to be![]()
