in the uk if you just put the numbers straight forward like that then it equals 1. we use brackets if we want to multiply the answers of a sum.
so for instance it would be (40+40) X (0+1). this would equal 81.
if you just type out the question like this 40+40x0+1 then you just do the simple math in the correct order. this would equal 1.
so the only 2 answers you can get are 1 and 81. no 41 in sight.

It has nothing to do with brackets honestly; it's about order of operations. People just need to accept that they were never one to pay attention in Math class.So everyone in this thread is right in a way - it's just where you place the brackets.

Was wondering how someone could come up with 81, but breaking up the equation like that makes some sense.
So everyone in this thread is right in a way - it's just where you place the brackets.![]()
you just cant make up brackets

It has nothing to do with brackets honestly; it's about order of operations. People just need to accept that they were never one to pay attention in Math class.![]()
place what brackets? there are no brackets in the equationyou just cant make up brackets
whole thread![]()
I'm saying breh.place what brackets? there are no brackets in the equationyou just cant make up brackets
whole thread![]()
Even if you were to add brackets, for whatever reason, you still couldn't just change the original meaning of the expression.
I'm saying breh.Even if you were to add brackets, for whatever reason, you still couldn't just change the original meaning of the expression.
Wolfram Alpha strangely throws in brackets and interprets it as: 40 + (40 x 0) + 1. Therefore making it 41.
And I remember that programming languages like Python do this too. They break up equations into segments with brackets before answering them.
Python Programming/Basic Math - Wikibooks, open books for an open world
The answer you get depends on where the brackets are.
(40 + 40) x 0 + 1 = 1
40 + (40 x 0) + 1 = 41
40 + 40 x ( 0 + 1) = 80
The given algebraic expression has no brackets/parentheses. Adding brackets/parentheses can change the entire expression's meaning, which is what people are doing to fit their own answers; you can't just do that.Brackets are not only an operation, but it's also the first in that order.
Some countries, read from right to left. People also have different preferences so it's better to have a standard. It's akin to naming chemical compounds. There may be several ways to name a particular compound and people would just choose whichever one they feel so a standard is needed. Without a standard, it would cause too much confusion/error, as can be seen in this thread. Example: I calculated $81.The answer is 41, but that I always thought that PEMDAS shyt was stupid. Wouldn't it make more sense to just go in order from left to right?![]()
You still owe me 40.
I calculated $41. 
Please tell me you're joking.
Those are all different expressions. (2+2)+5 is a different expression from 2+(2+5). When you're in a classroom setting you can't just throw brackets/parentheses in and do whatever you feel. The given expression is: 40 + 40 x 0 + 1. No parentheses or anything, which is different from (40+40)*0+1. Different programming languages also follow different rules/conventions, which is something you would know if you programmed. 

The given algebraic expression has no brackets/parentheses. Adding brackets/parentheses can change the entire expression's meaning, which is what people are doing to fit their own answers; you can't just do that.
Those are all different expressions. (2+2)+5 is a different expression from 2+(2+5). When you're in a classroom setting you can't just throw brackets/parentheses in and do whatever you feel. The given expression is: 40 + 40 x 0 + 1. No parentheses or anything, which is different from (40+40)*0+1. Different programming languages also follow different rules/conventions, which is something you would know if you programmed.
![]()