MrSinnister
Delete account when possible.
No, I stand as spoken.You want to rethink or retract this statement, before we go any further?
or do you want to establish it as an "ought"?
No, I stand as spoken.You want to rethink or retract this statement, before we go any further?
or do you want to establish it as an "ought"?
They can but the dictionary says otherwiseNot all people make this distinction.
They can but the dictionary says otherwise
I can call a pig a law, but that does not make it so
there are very important distinctions
What would you consider proof that laws are not made from mores?No, I stand as spoken.
I think English is Englishbut if you think that legal intepretivism
I think English is English
so you yourself in this statement are making at last one distinction between law and moresAgain...You can get individual punishment from breaking mores, such a community approval if a parent disowns their children for dating outside their race, but that more became law, in America, for a good period of time, with a definite set punishment.
But the butterfly comes from the catepillar, always.so you yourself in this statement are making at last one distinction between law and mores
at the least we can agree that a caterpillar is not a butterfly...at the least...the very least
Right.
Because it's not like languages have ambiguities or anything.

not one worthy of calling itself a languageRight.
Because it's not like languages have ambiguities or anything.
This.The problem with this discussion is that, outside of science, there is no such thing as an universal set of laws. Social laws are based from experience and interpretation.
but one is no longer the other and they are not interchangeable...at the very leastBut the butterfly comes from the caterpillar, always.
They are still the same creature, just at different stages of development. Nothing but what we've called them, and their abilities, have really changed.but one is no longer the other and they are not interchangeable...at the very least