What is this Obamagate shyt that is trending on Twitter?

MoneyTron

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,256
Reputation
3,677
Daps
102,262
Reppin
Atlanta
And as you can see, the GOP as a whole are tryna back of from this shyt. They know it's a bad idea
The premise of Obama getting involved with his justice department(which he wouldn't, otherwise Hillary's e-mails don't become a thing), flies in the face of Barr's argument that the President isn't really limited in his powers.

Trump is also operating off of the assumption that Obama is just as corrupt as he is and would do something like what he's alleging. :mjlol:

This is just so stupid.
 

Consigliere

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
10,833
Reputation
2,014
Daps
38,526
The career politicians in DC and their circles who actually make up the “Deep State” (which includes Republicans and their donors) know that this is not the precedent they want to set.

There is a reason that former presidents don’t attack each other. And a large part of that is that every admin is guilty of various crimes.

Obama could have went after Bush and Cheney.

W could have continued the attacks on the Clintons.

Clinton could have gone after Bush/Reagan.

And so on.

Consider it the gentleman’s agreement of politics. Trump should be be more appreciative of the rules. These same rules will keep him out of jail after his term.
 

fact

Fukk you thought it was?
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,701
Reputation
6,117
Daps
59,772
Reppin
How you gonna ROFL with a hollow back?
Trump was complaining about the long standing tradition of ex-presidents not criticizing their replacements in public. Obama already violated that even if you deem it passive. Do you think upholding that tradition is valid or Obama should just say fukk that and go in?
Should tell that fukking piece of shyt to suck his fukking dikk with Jr’s shyt on it, but only after he ran through Melania, raw, but only after she put a paper bag over her c*nt face. Trump isn’t doing anything that past presidents have done, all decorum out the window. fukk that cocksucking fukkface.
 

Geek Nasty

Brain Knowledgeably Whizzy
Supporter
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
31,987
Reputation
5,770
Daps
121,480
Reppin
South Kakalaka
The career politicians in DC and their circles who actually make up the “Deep State” (which includes Republicans and their donors) know that this is not the precedent they want to set.

There is a reason that former presidents don’t attack each other. And a large part of that is that every admin is guilty of various crimes.

Obama could have went after Bush and Cheney.

W could have continued the attacks on the Clintons.

Clinton could have gone after Bush/Reagan.

And so on.

Consider it the gentleman’s agreement of politics. Trump should be be more appreciative of the rules. These same rules will keep him out of jail after his term.

It's a REALLY BAD precedent to set having new Presidents go after old ones. That's why they avoid it at all costs. You don't want to turn the US into some junta where the next President throws the guy he beat in an election in jail.

As for Trump, he's still fukked because the shyt he's going down for happened *before* he was President. And once the black-and-white evidence is out and there's no Barr to protect him, it's over. Trump right now, TODAY is an un-indicted co-conspirator in at 3 crimes that lead to guilty verdicts.
* Trumps fradulent charity he stole from for personal use
* Trump University fraud
* The Stormy Daniels debacle with his lawyer. If Cohen was guilty then Trump had to be as well.
 
Top