Can someone tell this dude that we have LITERALLY defined the term in here numerous times on how it has been used by the majority of ppl IRL and how it has been used by many others on here.You are doing this as well, especially when you said "SJWs are usually white men". You haven't actually defined what it is. Are you a Nazi?
Something can be a common term, and still have criteria to define it. SJW should be the same, but it's so overused that it is on track to being like the word "communist" or "Nazi".
Does a word have to be as bad as the n-word to be overused, vacuous, and annoying?
I strongly disagree.
And please, read the link.
Neither of them have anything meaningful to say.
What makes a cause "bullsh*t"?
Who gets to decide what causes are worthy of being fought?
Think carefully about your answer to this question; I'll be referring to your words here.
completely disregarding the meaning of the word and how it is being used by the ppl using it is just another example of blindly sticking to some phantom POV and displays ignorance.
this whole thread is this:
OP - "What's up with this SJW thing?"
Coli militant - "It's a white supremacist term used by nazis who don't believe is social justice and equality"
Rational ppl - "Actually it is not, it's a term used to make fun of ppl that don't really care about true social justice and prefer to shut down communication and rational conversation"
Coli militant - "Soo, is MLK a SJW?"
Rational ppl - "

Coli Militant - "fukk you cac!!! go back to ****** and reddit stupid fukkin CAC Nazi"
Rational ppl - "

Coli militant - "Posts random internet buzzwords and smilies"
*the rest of the coli militant brigade daps wildly and posts their own smilies and buzzwords while collectively dappin each other and completely ignoring and rational conversation involved*
rational ppl -
