bishop
Rookie
to cite his homeruns & RBIs is lame because historically shortstops have not been expected to produce big in those areas.. his contemporaries did, but they have dogged by steroid suspicions and failed tests
aside from that, 98-02 he was absolutely one of the top 3 at his position and what I would call "great"
how does being top 10 all-time in hits not qualify as being "right up there"? and it's not just a matter of sticking around long enough to get there cuz he averaged 180 hits/season over 18 seasons... that ain't ordinary breh
but I feel like this is all in vain, because you are obviously set in your opinion so..
aside from that, 98-02 he was absolutely one of the top 3 at his position and what I would call "great"
how does being top 10 all-time in hits not qualify as being "right up there"? and it's not just a matter of sticking around long enough to get there cuz he averaged 180 hits/season over 18 seasons... that ain't ordinary breh

but I feel like this is all in vain, because you are obviously set in your opinion so..



his consistency (more 200 hit seasons that T Gwynn) and leadership...
Thread makes sense now.An Orioles fan.