What makes Lebron better than Kareem?

BrothaZay

Non-FBA. AdosK
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
65,349
Reputation
6,740
Daps
225,899
Reppin
The suburbs
Here's a question, when people talk "peaks" or even standard GOAT evaluation, tell me who wore as many hats as Peak and Prime Bron and held that level of play for as long as he has? Who was expected to be the primary offensive playmaker, the first scoring option, the offensive closer, and ANCHOR the defense?

If you can answer these questions we have a clear picture on who peaked the highest...



Your unathletic ass know how tall I am 🤣, I grew up playing streetball with older kids so I could probably beat you anyway 🤣 🤣 🤣...
So you never played? Ol fat head ass nikka
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
14,319
Reputation
-230
Daps
25,217
Because Lebron is the greatest basketball player ever and has been for like 8 years
Can’t be the greatest basketball player ever and only win 4-6 chips in 20 years when the real goat MJ won 6-0 with 2 3-peats and was more dominant over his peers in less time.
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
14,319
Reputation
-230
Daps
25,217
This lousy argument is so tired.
Not an argument just a reality. The main issue why Lebron cannot be goat is because the consensus have seen better in MJ. IMO Bron is the undisputed #2 especially after passing KAJ on the scoring list. The scoring list only affects Kareem’s standing and not MJ. Kobe and Malone passed MJ a long time ago so it’s not a factor.
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
85,505
Reputation
26,548
Daps
381,761
So if winning doesn't make you the great, what makes you the great?
Imagine two players have the exact same performance.

One loses a game.
The other wins a game.

Who is the better player?

The answer is neither. They have the exact same output.

The win and the loss are the result of other things. Coaching. Teammates. Whatever. It could be 50 reasons.

If you can understand that, you understand why something like ring count isn’t a good way to decide who is better between two players.

Now obviously the best players perform in such a way that it tends to lead to wins over time. But it’s a highly flawed way to measure his value/greatness.
 

Peruvian Connect

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
7,996
Reputation
-1,817
Daps
15,788
Reppin
NULL
Imagine two players have the exact same performance.

One loses a game.
The other wins a game.

Who is the better player?

The answer is neither. They have the exact same output.

The win and the loss are the result of other things. Coaching. Teammates. Whatever. It could be 50 reasons.

If you can understand that, you understand why something like ring count isn’t a good way to decide who is better between two players.

Now obviously the best players perform in such a way that it tends to lead to wins over time. But it’s a highly flawed way to measure his value/greatness.
so how do you measure greatnesss? And how does it put LeBron above all else
 

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
18,085
Reputation
2,746
Daps
36,026
Reppin
Philly
Imagine two players have the exact same performance.

One loses a game.
The other wins a game.

Who is the better player?

The answer is neither. They have the exact same output.

The win and the loss are the result of other things. Coaching. Teammates. Whatever. It could be 50 reasons.

If you can understand that, you understand why something like ring count isn’t a good way to decide who is better between two players.

Now obviously the best players perform in such a way that it tends to lead to wins over time. But it’s a highly flawed way to measure his value/greatness.
I agree. So, how would you look at everything and say Lebron is the greatest to ever play? How would you say MJ? What about WIlt? Oscar? Logo, Magic, Bird, Shaq, Cap, Dream...
 
Top