What recievers would you take over Prime Michael Irvin?

[Carlos Huerta]

In his prime, was not the 2nd best WR of the 90's because he was not better than Sterling Sharpe, Cris Carter, or Isaac Bruce.

In his prime or career-wise, he is one of the most overrated players of all time and him being on the top 100 players of all time list was an absolute farce.

i can see Sharpe and Carter, but you're reaching with Bruce just like you've been reaching with Brown.

 

[Joe Sixpack]

Nice counter-argument.

Tim Brown and Cris Carter were not better then Michael Irvin..

Nobody feared Carter or Brown ever.

You're a biased Raider fan..

Issac Bruce had better numbers and played longer and was really good but he was always hurt.

But the playmaker was special and he dominated people in his prime..

Issac Bruce only had one year in 1995 where he dominated.

Go back to discussing politics now.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Irvin was so nice in the first three seasons his college coach was gonna cut him

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

You do know Jimmy was gonna cut Troy too right?

 

[Reggie]

Irvin's numbers would have been better if he played til he was 37-38 like some of these other receivers. And he played for a run Emmitt into the ground offense all his career. In this era he definitely would be still be one of the top receivers in the game. Ima Cowboy fan to the heart but if he is overrated then Troy is too for that matter. He was pretty much just a glorified game manager if u look at the stats. And Emmitt is overrated because of the so called greatest line ever. But in actuality other than Larry Allen the Cowboys have no other future Hall of Famers on that line. Pro Bowlers sure but we say ourself Pro Bowl doesn't meant that much like it used to back in the day. And Barry Sanders had at least one maybe two PB o lineman on his Lions squads.