What tv should I get for PS5 and Series X ?

O.T.I.S.

The Monk & The Mercenary
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
89,810
Reputation
19,355
Daps
343,775
Reppin
The Truth
CX. Nanocells have a bad rep for screen uniformity issues and not good picture quality even by LCD standards.

On the other hand you don't have to worry about burn-in and unlike most LCDs (Samsung excluded) come with HDMI 2.1 as standard.

Edit

It also depends whether the television will be in a very bright environment. OLED does well in a dark environment while Nanocell does well in bright rooms.
I hear the LG Nanocell 90 actually has 2.1... which was one of the main reasons I went with the OLED
 

O.T.I.S.

The Monk & The Mercenary
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
89,810
Reputation
19,355
Daps
343,775
Reppin
The Truth
That's what I meant. The only LCD TVs with 2.1 are Samsung and LG. Sony only has one model with it and technically it hasn't because 2.1 will only be activated via an update.
So Nanocell or CX :lupe:

I mean, I already bought the CX but could return it for a bigger TV that utilizes 2.1 and a better value as well.

Do you know which one has the better input lag?
 

O³ (O cubed)

No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Messages
20,632
Reputation
6,975
Daps
75,963
Reppin
Hackney, London
So Nanocell or CX :lupe:

I mean, I already bought the CX but could return it for a bigger TV that utilizes 2.1 and a better value as well.

Do you know which one has the better input lag?
According to rtings.com, input lag for the CX is 13.6 ms. It's 14.7ms for the Nanocell.

Tbh the CX is the better TV.
 

O.T.I.S.

The Monk & The Mercenary
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
89,810
Reputation
19,355
Daps
343,775
Reppin
The Truth
According to rtings.com, input lag for the CX is 13.6 ms. It's 14.7ms for the Nanocell.

Tbh the CX is the better TV.
I thought CX said 1ms :stopitslime:


:mjlol:


it is, but it’s also $700 more for the equivalent size.

I’ll probably keep the OLED but I thought that was the only LG TV that did 2.1
 
Top