What would it take to get people to take climate change seriously?

Pure Water

Veteran
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
15,286
Reputation
3,014
Daps
75,433
Bodies to start dropping in huge numbers as the direct result of climate change. Anything else and we're going to keep moving as slowly as we've been moving.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,671
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,553
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
Most people that "take climate change seriously" don't take climate change seriously.
Ask yourself, do you:
Use air conditioning? Use heat in the winter?
Take a hot shower every day?
Eat shyt that doesn't grow locally? (somewhat ironic that avocados are the trendy food of "progressives")
Drive a car often?
Patronize restaurants with that run 20 big screen televisions at once?
Hop on a plane and travel the world often?
etc...

Most people that take climate change seriously are only willing to go as far as to bytch about and mock republicans. Maybe post about it obsessively on the internet...
We doing this dishonest shyt again. This is circa republican 2004 shyt.

You can't be against climate change if you don't live a nomadic lifestyle :krs::smugdraper:

:laff: terrible
 

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,584
Reputation
6,087
Daps
63,269
Reppin
Knicks
We doing this dishonest shyt again. This is circa republican 2004 shyt.

You can't be against climate change if you don't live a nomadic lifestyle :krs::smugdraper:

:laff: terrible
No difference between a nomadic lifestyle, and being a part of the most energy consuming society in human history?

Always with the extremes...
First sign of a vapid argument...
 

afterlife2009

Superstar
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
4,818
Reputation
1,100
Daps
17,668


America’s nearing a record number of weather disasters, and it’s not even hurricane season yet.

New data out Friday from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shows that there have been nine extreme weather events — each racking up more than $1 billion in losses — during the first half of 2017. An average year between 1980 and 2016 had just 5.5 major events, after adjusting for inflation.

screen-shot-2017-07-07-at-11-45-03-am.png


That means we’ve already racked up more than a year’s worth of weather disasters in 2017 — the second-fastest pace in history.

Weather-wise, pretty much the whole country is a hot mess right now. In 20 states, regions experienced their warmest first half of the year on record; as of now, only Washington and Oregon are on pace for relatively normal years. There’s a smoldering drought burning up North Dakota wheat fields, rainfall in parts of Michigan and the South is 300 percent of normal over the past 30 days, and a 131-year-old heat record could fall in Los Angeles this weekend. Oh yeah, there’s also a 25,000 acre wildfireburning just outside Tucson, Arizona.

And with hurricane season running about seven weeks ahead of schedule, it’s possible the worst weather of 2017 is yet to come.
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,857
Reputation
7,427
Daps
111,968
energy-consumption-by-country.jpg


But Hillary won the popular vote....
You do know the largest share of electricity consumption in the US is from industry, right? :gucci:
As well as the US military's use?
In fact, the US military is the largest consumer of crude oil in the world.
Private citizens won't make a difference by limiting their own personal consumption.
Same with water conservation, the biggest issue is agriculture in unsustainable places, especially California, and the raising of cattle.
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,857
Reputation
7,427
Daps
111,968
You think data from 2016 would be much different? I'd take the time to find it if I wasn't sure you'd just respond with a stupid smiley.

My point is Americans talk a good game, but aren't willing to actually be the change they want.
Also, consider that data and consider the comparative populations of each nation.
The "change they want" would have to be legislative restrictions on agriculture, the US military, and corporations industrial input.
The vast, vast majority of private American citizens don't have a say in any of that. This is doubly true for Democrats, as Republican administrations have continually pushed us further in. Trump is trying to use coal as a selling point :mjlol:
 

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,584
Reputation
6,087
Daps
63,269
Reppin
Knicks
You do know the largest share of electricity consumption in the US is from industry, right? :gucci:
As well as the US military's use?
In fact, the US military is the largest consumer of crude oil in the world.
Private citizens won't make a difference by limiting their own personal consumption.
Same with water conservation, the biggest issue is agriculture in unsustainable places, especially California, and the raising of cattle.
So the American government is expending the vast majority of it's efforts to secure oil so it can fuel the military to secure oil?
And the industry thats being fueled is for what? Might it be the endless amounts of consumer products we have been convinced we need in order to be happy?

If you really don't think the American people and our addiction to consumerism has nothing to do with any of this, I don't know what to tell you.
You ever been outside of America? It takes half a brain cell to realize the average American lives like a king compared to the vast majority of the rest of the world, and, by and large, we're driven solely by the desire to acquire even more luxury.

But, blaming others for all the world's problems is as American as it gets...so, again, I don't know what to tell you.
 

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,584
Reputation
6,087
Daps
63,269
Reppin
Knicks
The "change they want" would have to be legislative restrictions on agriculture, the US military, and corporations industrial input.
The vast, vast majority of private American citizens don't have a say in any of that. This is doubly true for Democrats, as Republican administrations have continually pushed us further in. Trump is trying to use coal as a selling point :mjlol:
And all of those things, at the end of the day, would result in Americans having to make sacrifices. So, whether it be government mandated sacrifices or self-imposed ones, I would argue that the majority of arm-chair environmentalists aren't willing to put their money where the mouths are, so to speak. And, to my original point, if you really cared why would you feel the need to wait for the government to force you to begin sacrificing?

You think corporations and such are wasteful for the hell of it? Or is it possibly connected to the crazy low prices that expect when we walk into the grocery store and by fresh produce grown half a world away?
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
35,699
Reputation
7,230
Daps
119,703
urgency. it's not an IMMEDIATE threat, so ppl aren't taking great steps to mitigate
 

Meta Reign

I walk the streets like, ''say something, n!gga!''
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
3,224
Reputation
-3,611
Daps
6,601
Reppin
Franklin ave.
I know, I know. . . It's not CNN. It's not MSNBC. . . But it's real jouralism. You guys aren't use to that. Have an open mind and listen.

 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,671
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,553
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
Most people that "take climate change seriously" don't take climate change seriously.
Ask yourself, do you:
Use air conditioning? Use heat in the winter?
Take a hot shower every day?
Eat shyt that doesn't grow locally? (somewhat ironic that avocados are the trendy food of "progressives")
Drive a car often?
Patronize restaurants with that run 20 big screen televisions at once?
Hop on a plane and travel the world often?
etc...

Most people that take climate change seriously are only willing to go as far as to bytch about and mock republicans. Maybe post about it obsessively on the internet...

No difference between a nomadic lifestyle, and being a part of the most energy consuming society in human history?

Always with the extremes...
First sign of a vapid argument...

:heh: I'm going to leave this here for another 24 because I want you and others to realize how bad you contradict yourself in these 2 posts. Know I already have my reply post saved. You have all the time in the world to add qualifications and defend yourself.
 

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,584
Reputation
6,087
Daps
63,269
Reppin
Knicks
:heh: I'm going to leave this here for another 24 because I want you and others to realize how bad you contradict yourself in these 2 posts. Know I already have my reply post saved. You have all the time in the world to add qualifications and defend yourself.
There's no contradiction. If you don't see the contradiction in the the majority of people in the most wasteful society in history taking the moral high ground on being wasteful, then so be it.

America is a wasteland: The U.S. produces a shocking amount of garbage
Fossil fuels still dominate U.S. energy consumption despite recent market share decline - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

You're saying Americans have zero personal responsibility to change this....anything less would be a "nomadic lifestyle". So, the vast...vast majority of people on earth that don't pollute nearly as much as the average American are nomads?

Enjoy your countdown.
 
Last edited:

Uncle Hotep

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 19, 2015
Messages
3,078
Reputation
-5,181
Daps
4,483
I'm just wondering.

We're breaking temperature records pretty much every year and yet half the population (at least in the US) still thinks this is some sort of socialist conspiracy that just about every scientist in the world is in on. We elected a president that legit thinks it's a Chinese conspiracy.


What do you think it would take to get the general populace take the issue seriously? Most scientists agree that it's currently the biggest threat to human civilisation and will cause famines/droughts/disasters/etc but it seems like most folks are just unwilling to admit it's a thing.
The Earth's temp has changed over the millions years of existence....this is nothing new.
 
Top