Pure Water
Veteran
Bodies to start dropping in huge numbers as the direct result of climate change. Anything else and we're going to keep moving as slowly as we've been moving.
We doing this dishonest shyt again. This is circa republican 2004 shyt.Most people that "take climate change seriously" don't take climate change seriously.
Ask yourself, do you:
Use air conditioning? Use heat in the winter?
Take a hot shower every day?
Eat shyt that doesn't grow locally? (somewhat ironic that avocados are the trendy food of "progressives")
Drive a car often?
Patronize restaurants with that run 20 big screen televisions at once?
Hop on a plane and travel the world often?
etc...
Most people that take climate change seriously are only willing to go as far as to bytch about and mock republicans. Maybe post about it obsessively on the internet...


terribleNo difference between a nomadic lifestyle, and being a part of the most energy consuming society in human history?We doing this dishonest shyt again. This is circa republican 2004 shyt.
You can't be against climate change if you don't live a nomadic lifestyle
terrible
You do know the largest share of electricity consumption in the US is from industry, right?![]()
But Hillary won the popular vote....

The "change they want" would have to be legislative restrictions on agriculture, the US military, and corporations industrial input.You think data from 2016 would be much different? I'd take the time to find it if I wasn't sure you'd just respond with a stupid smiley.
My point is Americans talk a good game, but aren't willing to actually be the change they want.
Also, consider that data and consider the comparative populations of each nation.

So the American government is expending the vast majority of it's efforts to secure oil so it can fuel the military to secure oil?You do know the largest share of electricity consumption in the US is from industry, right?
As well as the US military's use?
In fact, the US military is the largest consumer of crude oil in the world.
Private citizens won't make a difference by limiting their own personal consumption.
Same with water conservation, the biggest issue is agriculture in unsustainable places, especially California, and the raising of cattle.
And all of those things, at the end of the day, would result in Americans having to make sacrifices. So, whether it be government mandated sacrifices or self-imposed ones, I would argue that the majority of arm-chair environmentalists aren't willing to put their money where the mouths are, so to speak. And, to my original point, if you really cared why would you feel the need to wait for the government to force you to begin sacrificing?The "change they want" would have to be legislative restrictions on agriculture, the US military, and corporations industrial input.
The vast, vast majority of private American citizens don't have a say in any of that. This is doubly true for Democrats, as Republican administrations have continually pushed us further in. Trump is trying to use coal as a selling point![]()
Most people that "take climate change seriously" don't take climate change seriously.
Ask yourself, do you:
Use air conditioning? Use heat in the winter?
Take a hot shower every day?
Eat shyt that doesn't grow locally? (somewhat ironic that avocados are the trendy food of "progressives")
Drive a car often?
Patronize restaurants with that run 20 big screen televisions at once?
Hop on a plane and travel the world often?
etc...
Most people that take climate change seriously are only willing to go as far as to bytch about and mock republicans. Maybe post about it obsessively on the internet...
No difference between a nomadic lifestyle, and being a part of the most energy consuming society in human history?
Always with the extremes...
First sign of a vapid argument...
I'm going to leave this here for another 24 because I want you and others to realize how bad you contradict yourself in these 2 posts. Know I already have my reply post saved. You have all the time in the world to add qualifications and defend yourself.There's no contradiction. If you don't see the contradiction in the the majority of people in the most wasteful society in history taking the moral high ground on being wasteful, then so be it.I'm going to leave this here for another 24 because I want you and others to realize how bad you contradict yourself in these 2 posts. Know I already have my reply post saved. You have all the time in the world to add qualifications and defend yourself.
The Earth's temp has changed over the millions years of existence....this is nothing new.I'm just wondering.
We're breaking temperature records pretty much every year and yet half the population (at least in the US) still thinks this is some sort of socialist conspiracy that just about every scientist in the world is in on. We elected a president that legit thinks it's a Chinese conspiracy.
What do you think it would take to get the general populace take the issue seriously? Most scientists agree that it's currently the biggest threat to human civilisation and will cause famines/droughts/disasters/etc but it seems like most folks are just unwilling to admit it's a thing.