What's wrong with polygamy again?

[Swagnificent]

Look at Utah and countries that practice it

What ends up happening is that a very small group of older men with the most wealth end up with most of the available women.

The vast majority of men cant afford to even smell p*ssy until theyre well into theyre 30s or 40s.

Until then they must either leave the area or settle for fukking goats, chickens or little boys.

And that's the way shyt has always been. Its called survival of the fittest for a reason.

We are products genetically of those few alpha males that were able to procreate with most of the available women.

Look up the genetic studies. The male line of most humans is much less diverse than the female lineage. This lets us know that our history was filled with polygyny. A few men fukking all the women and producing the kids.

 

[ThatTruth777]

My Dads younger brother has four wives, one of them is a college professor ......

whatever problems you will have in a traditional marriage with one woman times that by the number of wives you have, plus add a few more problems unique to a polygamous marriage ....

having seen a polygamous marriage upfront I wouldnt wish it on my worst enemy .....

most of you dudes aint built for it

Reminds me of a saying I got from Ray's daddy on Everybody Love Raymond when he thought Ray was cheating on his wife, he told him
"You idiot! If you got a problem with one woman, you don't go out and get another one.. because now you have two problems!"

 

[Lifejennings]

That's heresay. I'm speaking on scientific discovery.



Gay men and woman champion monogamy. The media is ran by gays. Figure it out.



That's the way it is now.

Gay men champion monogamy? You sound like a moron.

 

[Swagnificent]

No they do not. Men don't want a women who is wanted by others. A man only cares if a woman is a 10 to him.

This. It actually pisses me off when other dudes are eyeing me girl.

I don't know of a man who wants a woman desired by others. That's women.

Men just want a woman who is attractive to us. I could care less if other men didn't find my woman attractive (if I found her attractive). Obviously this is never gonna happen because as men we evolved to find the same shyt attractive so its rare that you could have a woman that you find incredibly attractive that other men don't find attractive as well.

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

She gets to be with the more successful man rather than settling for a scrub.

And in the black community in particular we have a surplus of black women for black men since so many black men are in prison or dead. Thus, the black community would benefit great from sistas sharing a successful black man.

Thst would benefit very few BW since there are a very limited number of BM would could afford to live such a lifestyle.

 

[Swagnificent]

So if u agree that's a bad thing, why are u vouching for a system that would put this into overdrive?

It seems like u need to really think rationally about this. Also stop using hoemotions to try and justify wanting to get ur dikk wet. Are u trying to use an evolutionary standpoint to say its natural for men to sleep around, b/c scientist have long established that female promiscuity is just as "natural" as well due to females trying to maximize the best offspring by having sex with many powerful males.

However monogamy is natural as well and scientist say we evolved into monogamous relationships to pair-bond which provides stability and safety for offspring. It's seem like both men and women must naturally turn off their inner hoe and grow up to create safe environments for offspring.

It kills me when people try these "natural" arguments without being honest about what that actually means for men and women. Seriously societal constraints are just as much apart of human evolution as everybody fukking everybody is.
Hell evolutionist speculate that women cry out during sex to alert other males to fukk her. You sure u wanna go down the "natural" rabbit hole?

nikka Please. That bullshyt you just posted is nothing more than these new age feminists and fakkits creating shyt to try and make men and women seem the same. We are NOT. Men and women are different. And the truth is in the biology.

Men produce millions of sperm a day. Hence we are biologically programmed to want to fukk as many women as possible. And since we can keep shooting loads every day we have no impetus to be very choosy. Basically the more bytches we impregnate the better because it increases the likelihood that our seed is born.

Women produce only one egg a month. They are not biologically programmed to be whores. They are biologically programmed to want to pick out one man who is the best. And unlike men who only go for looks (AKA the best genes), women must balance the man with the best genes (AKA the most attractive) with the guy who is the best provider. Why? Because its the woman who becomes pregnant for 9 months and must give birth to the child. So the woman has more reason to look for the provider than the best looking guy. Because we evolved in the African Savannah, it was impossible for a pregnant female to survive on her own without a man to take care of her. That thinking has progressed to the modern era where women look for men with money to support them financially.

The only women who are whores are those who want to deceive their provider mate. They basically want the benefit of the best genes with the best provider. And hoes like that eventually get exposed. Which is why hoeing is not selected for in the female character.

So please stop spreading these lies by feminists and fakkits to try and make men and women seem the same. We are not. We are different. Men are programmed to be with multiple women. Women are programmed to be with one man who can take care of them. PERIOD.

 

[Swagnificent]

Thst would benefit very few BW since there are a very limited number of BM would could afford to live such a lifestyle.

Very few is better than NONE. Right now there is an epidemic of black women not getting married. So we gotta start somewhere. You got to think that after a few generations of successful polygamous marriages that we will have more successful black men ready to take on even more sistas.

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

Right. That is why Western men could never really handle it. To them it's all about putting their dikks in as many holes as possible instead of the actual community/social "benefits" it is suppose to have.

Polygamy would really only benefit a society that had an extreme shortage of men. Like in times after war for example. It really has no benefit in the current society we live in.

Polygamy has nothing to do with threesomes. In fact, in the polygamy I have seen practiced the women don't have sex with one another.

There is an extreme shortage of available black men in the black community. Unless your're promoting swirling and bedwenchery.

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

The problem with polygamy

That's a fukking hell of a reach.

Most of the violence in those areas is due to religion, not polygamy.

 

[Swagnificent]

Men do. That's why one woman on instagram can have millions of followers. That's why they call them trophy wives. A trophy to whom?

Very few men want a female that is undesirable.

Also u can't name a benefit. You're just spitting nonsense now.

And from a natural evolutionary standpoint that u love to arbitrarily argue from, in my most natural state, I'm supposed to cheat b/c it maximizes the quality of offspring.

Luckily pairbonding is evolutionary as well so we can respect relationships.

Humans are fascinating aren't they?!

That's only because we evolved to find the same attributes attractive.

You are arguing that there is something about having other men desire your woman that motivates men. That couldn't be further from the truth. If nobody on earth other than me found Ashley Graham attractive I would be ecstatic. Some are already saying she's too fat right now. But I wouldn't give a fukk if everyone else found her unattractive cause I find her to be fine as fukk. And I would enjoy having sex with her.

Men are not driven by petty shyt like women. Its women that are always competing against one another over irrelevant shyt. Men only compete over tangible things that have meaning. We don't want our woman to be desired simply for the sake of other men looking at her enviously when we walk by.

We just want a woman who we find to be attractive. PERIOD. And the less men that agree the better cause it means less competition for that fine female.

 

[Caribbean lover]

So if u agree that's a bad thing, why are u vouching for a system that would put this into overdrive?

It seems like u need to really think rationally about this. Also stop using hoemotions to try and justify wanting to get ur dikk wet. Are u trying to use an evolutionary standpoint to say its natural for men to sleep around, b/c scientist have long established that female promiscuity is just as "natural" as well due to females trying to maximize the best offspring by having sex with many powerful males.

However monogamy is natural as well and scientist say we evolved into monogamous relationships to pair-bond which provides stability and safety for offspring. It's seem like both men and women must naturally turn off their inner hoe and grow up to create safe environments for offspring.

It kills me when people try these "natural" arguments without being honest about what that actually means for men and women. Seriously societal constraints are just as much apart of human evolution as everybody fukking everybody is.
Hell evolutionist speculate that women cry out during sex to alert other males to fukk her. You sure u wanna go down the "natural" rabbit hole?

exactly these guys don't understand that these theories are being changed in the weight of new evidence. They just cherry pick what studies and theory they like and roll with it. Most men simply dont have to provisions and time to take care of so many women. Especially when people are struggling with so much debt household ,student loans etc.

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

Why are you asking me questions when I asked for a benefit? How does sharing a man benefit a woman in a society that has equal gender populations and women work?

Single women raising kids without men in their lives is destroying the black community. Maintenance of family structures is the only way to salvage that.

It seems you're acting dense on purpose. Take your feelings out of it and try and understand the question.

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Very few is better than NONE. Right now there is an epidemic of black women not getting married. So we gotta start somewhere. You got to think that after a few generations of successful polygamous marriages that we will have more successful black men ready to take on even more sistas.

If the marriage was zero you might have a point but what you are purposing would literally decrease the marrige rate and not improve it.

 

[Lotsford]

No it wouldn't. Polyandry is Maasai culture and other cultures around the world rarely happens. And its typically when the wife of one brother dies, that the other brother shares his wife with his brother. So its typically men from the same family sharing the woman. And they do this because they typically can't afford to buy a new wife.

Its not natural for a woman to be with multiple men. It only happens in those societies with brothers or cousins from the same family unit.

If a Maasai man wished to avail himself of the matrimonial benefits of his mate’s wife, all he needed to do was call on her while the husband was out, plant his spear outside her hut, and the woman would be his for the night as long as the spear stood its ground. If the husband happened to come home while the spear was still erect (no pun intended, but the English ought to broaden their vocabulary), he would understand and move on to another mate’s hut and “do likewise”. And so it went, or perhaps still goes. We would have confirmed this with Ferdinand Waitutu, who in his defence to the charge of hate speech against the Maasai, now claims to be one himself, but we do not have his number. Perhaps we should look at last week’s news of two men in Mombasa who signed a peace, love and unity pact in relation to their mutual feelings of affection towards the same woman in this context. (We never knew we would use the Nyayo Philosophy one day). It was reported that the two men engaged in a physical fight when they discovered that for at least four years they unknowingly shared the society and service of the same woman. After the fight came the pact. The two men voluntarily agreed to share the woman, to harbour no jealousy towards each other in relation to her, and to respect an agreed weekly roster through which husbandly duties (and all the rights attached thereto) would be performed.
Read more at: Of polyandry and related matters...


For instance, both polygamy and polyandry are common marital practices within the group. Women are allowed to marry more than one person within their age group, and even choose whatever partner they want.

Holding on to Culture in a Changing World: The Maasai - Face2Face Africa

So we still fukking with our African ancestor's systems or nah?

 

[Swagnificent]

You guys really don't want to make these evolutionary arguments to justify this trust me. Some researchers out here theorizing that's it's actually the female that's suppose to have more than one male partner. These evolutionary arguments ain't helping men

That's fakkits and feminists breh trying to twist science to fit their agenda. Don't believe these liars. Just look at the animal kingdom. It tells us what is real and what isn't.

I actually studied this topic in college. I took a course on biological antropology where we studied the issue of polygamy in nature. Basically, polygamous relationships only happen in species where there is "sexual dimorphism". That's a fancy way of saying that there is a difference in size between different genders of the same species (i.e. human males being larger on average than human females).

So basically whenever you have one gender larger than another in a species you see polygamy. When you have the males and females in a species being the same size you see monogamy. Humans are the only outlier here. We are the only primate species where we have sexual dimorphism (men bigger than women) but we practice monogamy. This should let us know that monogamy is social engineering rather than natural.

Also I should note that its the gender who is larger that practices polygamy. So in Gorillas and Chimps where the males are larger than the females, they practice polygyny (one male, multiple females). However, among Lemurs in Madagascar, where the females are larger on average than the males, you have polyandry (one female, multiple males).

So its the size of the genders in the species that controls where its polygyny or polyandry and not whatever bullshyt you reading from the new age feminists and fakkits that wanna spread their ideology into science.