Whats wrong with TLR?

[charmander]

i got you @cook

i'll clean this shythole up

 

[flea]

Nothing. Same people complaining are the same ones that NEVER contribute to shyt. All their post are is complaints about how bad shyt is.

Then it's an ignore feature that's works stupendously, yet people feel some type of way using it but somehow don't feel some type of way complaining all day.

You have a problem with TLR? Go to another forum within the coli, create threads you want to talk about or log the fukk off.

mmm reading this was delicious. but yeah this ^^^^

 

[Big Daddy]

 

[Big Daddy]

i got you @cook

i'll clean this shythole up

mmm reading this was delicious. but yeah this ^^^^

Should've known I'd see you two mouth flappin fakkits up in here b!tching n whining
Ironic, considering yall are part of the problem, what with your multiple homo erotic sh!t-threads that you BOTH have spammed TLR with, and all

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

YOU COULD HAVE A ROTATING GUEST MOD SPOT THAT'S ENTRUSTED TO A WELL-KNOWN POSTER FOR A MONTH, BROTHER!

YOU COULD HAVE A SUBFORUM CALLED "THE SHOWERS" WHERE ALL THE GAY AND TRANNY THREADS CAN HANG OUT TOGETHER, DUDE!

I DON'T THINK WE NEED A MEN-ONLY FORUM SINCE WE ALREADY HAVE THE SECRET MEN ONLY FORUM, MEAN GENE!

 

[flea]

Should've known I'd see you two mouth flappin fakkits up in here b!tching n whining
Ironic, considering yall are part of the problem, what with your multiple homo erotic sh!t-threads that you BOTH have spammed TLR with, and all

Who the fukk are u? I forgot this fakkit existed you're a forgettable ass poster

 

[Black Hans]

TLR needs to cut down on:

• Thirsty nikkas posting IG chicks and "which one of you Coli ladies gonna let me eat the booty" type threads
• Loser/Imaginary Alpha Males acting like they spitting game threads
• Threads with dudes crying about women ad nauseam
• Threads that can be summed up as anti-black/racist by an objective person
• "C00n" threads and posts

Cut down on those threads by 70-75% and you'll do well to TLR

 

[Sonic Boom of the South]

Ban people for getting butt hurt over a msg board that they demand change here more than change in how America is run

 

[HabitualChiller]

Close the fukking forum to guest already!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What is that supposed to do? Guests can't post here and doing so pretty much will kill the hopes of adding any new posters.

 

[Concerning VIolence]

All the trolls, cacs, and c00ns copping pleas in this thread.

"If you don't like it, just ignore it".

"Disagreeing with a post doesn't mean it's low quality"

"just log off".

 

[The Prince of All Saiyans]

turn rep back on
quit letting that lily pad frog on here
also quit letting @malcolmxxx_45 even live

 

[Pay Your Bills]

Don't change anything, TLR is for entertainement, we need crazy people and nonsense threads. For people who are mad, get a life.

 

[Klyk21]

What is that supposed to do? Guests can't post here and doing so pretty much will kill the hopes of adding any new posters.

 

[Kyle Barker]

I think the ignore feature should be placed somewhere under each person's avi and name to make it easier/faster for everyone so it'll be more common. All this banning and rep talk is corny and a waste of time.

 

[old_timer]

I'm about to post something completely outside of the bracket.. but it might be worth consideration

(80/20)^2

basically you got 2000 new threads in tlr each week
What to do??
Let 80% roll, consider taking action on the weakest 20% (400)
Of those 400, consider merging up to 80% (320) into recent yet closely related threads
Consider moving the other 20% (80) to a different forum (inc bushes)

What constitutes a weak thread is not as completely subjective as people think
Basically.. is this a new topic or a fresh take on an existing topic??
And as a tiebreaker, what maximum potential upside does it offer??

Now 400 actions a week is a heavy load..
10 minutes per action .. that's 67 hours a week
probably need 7 mods to run that program but it IS possible

Notice i didn't say a word about deleting anything or banning anyone ..just packaging the forum in a way to boost its quality and refocus interest