I think @Phoenix_Knightly23 would be a great mod.
I agreeI think @Phoenix_Knightly23 would be a great mod.


i already like this campaign's direction

rep never had any consequence thoBring the rep system back and ban low quality posters, I am talking about the ones who have negative 1000.
The rep system was the only way to judge good content.
Y'all removed it, so the trolls, racist cacs are running wild.
no banning, no threadmaking privileges taken away. it didnt really mean shyt 
Bring the rep system back and ban low quality posters, I am talking about the ones who have negative 1000.
The rep system was the only way to judge good content.
Y'all removed it, so the trolls, racist cacs are running wild.
Same threads over and over again, maybe for shock value or dap fishing.
No one with negative rep should be able to make a thread.
Other than that, I have no qualms here. shyt I can always log off
I understand what you are trying to say, but that's how decent members will be targeted. Remember rep wars? When someone didn't like another user or disagreed with their opinion so they got their kliq to neg them until they were put in red? Then just kept piling on the negs when they were in red?Please ban all the gay trolls and trannies from this site
Bring back rep, after a poster passes -1000 rep, posters with +1,000 rep can vote to ban poster from site
New mods been here almost 5 years and can't name 3 right now. Wtf do they do here?

i already like this campaign's direction![]()
- Intentional bait threads...folks creating threads for the sole purpose of starting some shyt, then never even appearing in the thread again
...

I'm like that piece of tissue stuck in ya ass. Aint no getting rid of me. I know this pasty skinned degenerate isn't talking.i already like this campaign's direction![]()

I see your point. Personally I have no issue with Napoleon and his thread but he'd be in that circle of getting thread rights revoked. But that's not to say he couldn't get them back with quality posting.I understand what you are trying to say, but that's how decent members will be targeted. Remember rep wars? When someone didn't like another user or disagreed with their opinion so they got their kliq to neg them until they were put in red? Then just kept piling on the negs when they were in red?
A lot of members here would start neg targeting members in order to get them banned or their thread making permissions removed. That would be chaos. It sounds good on paper, but a lot of decent members would be caught in the crossfire and that's not fair based on a simple disagreement.
Members should have zero control in how members are moderated. Sorry.![]()
There's a middle ground to be had here, it just takes some thinking on it.
I'm like that piece of tissue stuck in ya ass. Aint no getting rid of me.
I know this pasty skinned degenerate isn't talking.![]()

