What's your opinion on nuclear energy?

Well then?

  • Yes, I support it

    Votes: 13 81.3%
  • No, fukk that shyt

    Votes: 3 18.8%

  • Total voters
    16

The Odum of Ala Igbo

Hail Biafra!
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
17,969
Reputation
2,905
Daps
52,754
Reppin
The Republic of Biafra
What part of any this look environmental firendly to you?
istock_000013003946xxx_med-300x200.jpg

:martin:huh?:leostare:

Ya. That's steam billowing from the turbine :mjlol:
 

Black Nate Grey

The God Emperor of Mankind
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
7,355
Reputation
3,236
Daps
29,968
Embarrassingly, I'm not educated enough or know enough about nuclear energy to give or form an informed opinion.
I'm slacking.
 

King Khufu

CARTEL MAFIA GANG
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
5,211
Reputation
-596
Daps
8,833
Reppin
At Ur Mama's Bando
Believe "harmless energy" is clean but somehow can be weaponized brehs....
If its such a clean form of energy why it's so easily hazardous....#Think
 

BaldingSoHard

Banned
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
25,097
Reputation
7,388
Daps
111,378
Believe "harmless energy" is clean but somehow can be weaponized brehs....
If its such a clean form of energy why it's so easily hazardous....#Think

:why: Breh.... "nuclear power" doesn't mean what you think it means.
"radiation" doesn't mean what you think it means.
Trust me, nuclear plants are far and away the cleanest and safest form of power available today.
 

MikeyC

The Coli Royal Rumble Champion 2019
Joined
Jan 4, 2015
Messages
25,802
Reputation
4,974
Daps
88,688
Reppin
London

WaveCapsByOscorp™

2021 Grammy Award Winner
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,984
Reputation
-355
Daps
45,218
It’s cleanest, in a sense. The spent rods are waste and particularly harmful and dangerous when you think about it
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,005
Daps
122,437
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Just wanted to add something to my earlier post in case someone took what I stated as 'facts':

Thorium CAN be used to make WMD's, but it would be PROHIBITIVELY expensive and probably irradiate everything within a square mile and kill all life in the immediate vicinity. Found that out during my Engineering courses.

With that said, it would still be better than using Uranium for the simple fact that it wouldn't allow WMD's to be manufactured by anything less than a Government.

Also, due to the Internet, a cat could create a biological WMD in his basement and there's NOTHING the Government can do about it.​
 
Top