When did blaming a a politician's supporters become a thing?

Formerly Black Trash

Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
58,602
Reputation
-1,932
Daps
152,110
Reppin
Na
You act like people don’t communicate across mediums. Any of those people that had a bad interaction can go to their friends/fellow supporters in real life and tell them about something ugly said to them by Bernie fans online.

So ppl are just using anecdotal experiences and the media is blowing it up?
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
82,579
Reputation
10,371
Daps
243,746
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
It's always been a thing.

Hillary called Trump fans "deplorables"

Romney said that he would never get the "47%" that were just takers

Obama talked about the folk who just "cling to guns, cling to religion"


It always backfires. It's a dumb move and politicians shouldn't do it whether they think it's true or not unless they really like losing.
Obama boys was the precursor to Bernie Bros
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
49,014
Reputation
7,420
Daps
154,663
Reppin
CookoutGang
Bruh how did you ignore everything else I put in that statement?

Lol come on this HL we're supposed to be better than this
This is a low quality thread though. :francis:



The majority of people don't talk politics online nor in person. As a result the vocal minority will have an over representation of the masses.

shyt ain't complicated.

Not every Trump supporter is a red hat, but they still define being a Trump voter.

This is no different. :umad:
 

MoneyTron

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,256
Reputation
3,677
Daps
102,266
Reppin
Atlanta
So ppl are just using anecdotal experiences and the media is blowing it up?
.

As with Trump’s online contingent in 2016, I think this is a byproduct of running a populist “us vs them” style campaign. Aggressive online interactions, brigading, personal attacks, doxxing, etc, etc aren’t tolerated well on this side.

You may say “hey that doesn’t happen often, shyt is overblown” but if it happens enough times and effects enough people, it becomes reputation.
 

Mr Hate Coffee

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
19,247
Reputation
7,238
Daps
75,343
You’d be surprised how many Warren fans have sworn off Bernie due to his fans.

You may not like it, but it’s definitely a reputation Bernie fans have.

Ultimately this needs to be quantified... and at a state level. I’d venture to say the impact is minimal once the numbers are out out there.
 

Formerly Black Trash

Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
58,602
Reputation
-1,932
Daps
152,110
Reppin
Na
This is a low quality thread though. :francis:



The majority of people don't talk politics online nor in person. As a result the vocal minority will have an over representation of the masses.

shyt ain't complicated.

Not every Trump supporter is a red hat, but they still define being a Trump voter.

This is no different. :umad:
Nah, you're basically admitting I'm right
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,145
Reppin
the ether
So ppl are just using anecdotal experiences and the media is blowing it up?
I have a facebook friend who is a super-devoted Warren supporter who volunteers and canvasses for Warren's campaign. She's regularly saying the most hateful things about Bernie's supporters - claiming they're aggressive, belligerent, say mean things, and she repeatedly says they're no different from Trump supporters. Every single time she has a negative interaction with a Bernie supporter or even hears secondhand about someone else's negative interaction with a Bernie supporter, she blasts it across her page. The whole time, she seems oblivious to the facts that....

1. Most of the interactions with Bernie supporters she describes are ones that she initiates
2. Virtually all the negative things she says Bernie supporters do are things she does herself

But once you have a narrative to run with, and a self-serving motive for pushing that narrative, then objectivity goes out the window and the narrative takes over.
 

Formerly Black Trash

Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
58,602
Reputation
-1,932
Daps
152,110
Reppin
Na
No way obama boys was no where near this level. Bernie bros is doxxing, and using all types of right winged slander techniques to get employees to quit.

2 campaigns have complained about them, we going to sit here and act like it's not a serious problem?
I'm not saying it's not happening

But where do nikkas find these ppl?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,145
Reppin
the ether
262 million people are on Twitter the fukk are you talking about? social media is arguably the best way right now to canvass the fukk do you mean? And yes hiring negative attack dogs against candidates in your own party/ideology should be looked frown upon
That "262 million" number is specifically the # of Twitter users outside the USA so it's literally completely irrelevant.

22% of Americans are on Twitter and less than half of them use it regularly. So you're talking about just 10% of the population and it skews young and well-off.

Also, just 10% of Twitter users (so 2% of Americans) are responsible for 80% of the tweets. So it's not remotely representative of what the average person is like.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,692
Reputation
3,320
Daps
155,691
Around the time when those supporters started posting people’s addresses and showing up to their homes in the dead of night
Doxing and threatening employees/supporters is ok because @Rhakim know's one warren canvasser who acted like garbage
 
Top