Where do you see the mania main event going?

[NotAnFBIagent]

How could they not hand pick someone? You expect them to start the Rumble match and not know whose gonna win already? Every winner of every match ever has been hand picked whether you like the outcome or not. WWE is going to go with what they think will make them the most money. If you already have the WWE network they aren't going to make any money by making the matches you want for Wrestlemania.

He's a mid-carder and he's never had a main event feud. Indy experience doesn't matter. Look matters and he absolutely does not have the look. He is not believable at all against Brock Lesnar so unless you want to see him get squashed that match doesn't benefit anyone.

Reigns vs Cena or Reigns vs Triple H
Undertaker vs Sting or Undertaker vs Cena
Brock Lesnar vs Sheamus or Lesnar vs Reigns


Reigns vs Lesnar vs Cena is the most interesting main event to me and it allows for Sting vs Undertaker as well. The problem is they would have no star power for the other matches on the show. Maybe they would do Triple H vs Sheamus II.

Experience matters when considering owens can wrestle circles around majority of the roster and can hold his own on the mic...he doesn't have the typical wwe muscle bound look but he does look like the burly get in bar fights every weekend type look so long as they book him strong leading up to it he will be good going up against Lesnar

 

[Bars4TheCause]

Experience matters when considering owens can wrestle circles around majority of the roster and can hold his own on the mic...he doesn't have the typical wwe muscle bound look but he does look like the burly get in bar fights every weekend type look so long as they book him strong leading up to it he will be good going up against Lesnar

Lesnar is a NCAA and UFC champion. Some fat ass bar fighter would get demolished by Lesnar in every aspect of fighting whether it was a straight up brawl or technical. Lesnar's also a four time WWE champion so even in "kayfabe" some rookie whose never main evented a PPV has no business being in the ring with him.

 

[The Prince of All Saiyans]

when you just want that featured thread notification cause you stopped caring about yr own thread a long time ago

 

[NotAnFBIagent]

Lesnar is a NCAA and UFC champion. Some fat ass bar fighter would get demolished by Lesnar in every aspect of fighting whether it was a straight up brawl or technical. Lesnar's also a four time WWE champion so even in "kayfabe" some rookie whose never main evented a PPV has no business being in the ring with him.

So we counting Lesnar ufc and ncaa but considering ko a rookie after 14 years of wrestling

Going by your logic Lesnar should've done cena reigns and taker worse than he already did

 

[Bars4TheCause]

So we counting Lesnar ufc and ncaa but considering ko a rookie after 14 years of wrestling

Going by your logic Lesnar should've done cena reigns and taker worse than he already did

UFC is bigger than WWE. Winning the UFC and NCAA titles actually means something because their legit, real competitions.

PWG, ROH, etc are small and winning titles in pro wrestling is not the same as winning them in actual sports. Owens is a rookie in WWE.

Lesnar should never lose unless theirs a ton of interference/cheating or unless he faced another legit athlete like Mark Henry or Bobby Lashley.

 

[NotAnFBIagent]

UFC is bigger than WWE. Winning the UFC and NCAA titles actually means something because their legit, real competitions.

PWG, ROH, etc are small and winning titles in pro wrestling is not the same as winning them in actual sports. Owens is a rookie in WWE.

Lesnar should never lose unless theirs a ton of interference/cheating or unless he faced another legit athlete like Mark Henry or Bobby Lashley.

Yet cena reigns and taker all damn near gave him that work and Mark Henry is a jobber at this point.. U applying too much real world logic to wwe breh

 

[Bars4TheCause]

Yet cena reigns and taker all damn near gave him that work and Mark Henry is a jobber at this point.. U applying too much real world logic to wwe breh

When wrestling gets to unrealistic I get annoyed and stop watching. I expect wrestling to be logical like I expect any show to be logical.

 

[R=G]

Lmao@Lesnar vs sheamus...you done went completely nuts

 

[R=G]

UFC is bigger than WWE. Winning the UFC and NCAA titles actually means something because their legit, real competitions.

PWG, ROH, etc are small and winning titles in pro wrestling is not the same as winning them in actual sports. Owens is a rookie in WWE.

Lesnar should never lose unless theirs a ton of interference/cheating or unless he faced another legit athlete like Mark Henry or Bobby Lashley.

There is no one in UFC history bigger than Rock, Austin, Hogan, or Savage. So real competitions have a limit.

 

[Spyro]

So regardless of who Reigns is facing at Mania, and regardless of whether he walks in as champion or challenger, are we all certain then that he will walk out as champion and get his "Mania Moment"? Struggling to see how else it will go

 

[Osmosis]

There is no one in UFC history bigger than Rock, Austin, Hogan, or Savage. So real competitions have a limit.

Or Cena and Flair

 

[R=G]

Or Cena and Flair

Lesnar drew more than any Cena run ever when he was champion.

 

[Osmosis]

Lesnar drew more than any Cena run ever when he was champion.

Cena is still the bigger icon

 

[R=G]

Cena is still the bigger icon

Yeah he was given more after Lesnar decided to leave but usually, historically, it's gonna look like Cena was Lesnar's bytch throughout their careers.

 

[Osmosis]

Yeah he was given more after Lesnar decided to leave but usually, historically, it's gonna look like Cena was Lesnar's bytch throughout their careers.

They gave Lesnar just as much and he didn't cut it, business was low when they pushed him to the moon and when he quit.. Cena took the reigns and has kept the company afloat for ten plus years.