Which State wins the War?

Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
3,883
Reputation
760
Daps
12,951
Reppin
809 & 347
Feel like the south would naturally team up.

New York, PA and Jersey would pair up but I'm not sure about the other states up there. DMV would align but would they join NY/PA/NJ.....or fight them?

Virginia won't join forces with NY/PA/NJ if the south team up. Richmond was the capital of the Confederacy/South and it's only an hour or 2 away from the DMV/NOVA region. DC might aligned with DC because something that has to do with Arlington. Maryland is up for grabs imo.
 
Joined
May 29, 2018
Messages
1,103
Reputation
-110
Daps
3,389
Too many guns and military here. Trap the NYC brehs in the east Texas swamps and then it becomes target practice.
NY has the technology the economic might to deploy drones to destroy all of your ground forces rendering you obsolete. Also, most of the military forces are largely subsidized by the taxes from NY and California so without funding your military power is greatly diminished. So you only have the Texas national guard. In fact, NY doesn't have to even have a ground invasion. Since you're landlocked, NY can just isolate you with our drone boming technology and play the war of attrition until your forces are severely weaken
 
Joined
May 29, 2018
Messages
1,103
Reputation
-110
Daps
3,389
Virginia won't join forces with NY/PA/NJ if the south team up. Richmond was the capital of the Confederacy/South and it's only an hour or 2 away from the DMV/NOVA region. DC might aligned with DC because something that has to do with Arlington. Maryland is up for grabs imo.
You really think Richmond, with 45% black population, with join the NEW confederacy when their parents and ancestors escaped the OLD confederacy?
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
3,883
Reputation
760
Daps
12,951
Reppin
809 & 347
You really think Richmond, with 45% black population, with join the NEW confederacy when their parents and ancestors escaped the OLD confederacy?

Yea (while the black population is opposed to it )because of the whites surrounding Richmond would probably storm in the city like what happen to DC on January 6...if the states war turns out to be a race war then I can see Richmond, Atlanta and other cities with High black populations in the South and elsewhere would try seceding from their respective states and form a new state or territory .
 
Last edited:

Sterling Archer

Spider Mane
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
36,630
Reputation
11,706
Daps
178,836
Reppin
Chicago
the civil war is the closest event to states going against eachother dumb ass.


And if there was a war in America today. It would literally be 9 states again dumb ass because a lot of states are empty and would have to team up.
The civil war wasn’t states “going against eachother” it was states going against the nation. Goofball.
 

omnifax

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
3,809
Reputation
1,196
Daps
10,557
Reppin
Kalamazoo, MI #ADOS
I don't know what state or group of sates would win but the resource argument is moot. States without oil will most definitely get it from other countries like Iran who would love to get in on something like this. I think the states that form the most strategic alliances would win. IIRC even in the WWE battle royals there were loose alliances to try and make it till the end.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,117
Reppin
the ether
I don't know what state or group of sates would win but the resource argument is moot. States without oil will most definitely get it from other countries like Iran who would love to get in on something like this. I think the states that form the most strategic alliances would win. IIRC even in the WWE battle royals there were loose alliances to try and make it till the end.
You're minimizing how difficult those supply lines would be to create and maintain, especially for states without major ports. Even if you can get some oil from someone, you're not going to get as much as you want or in a timely matter. Resource availability and ease of supply lines are crucial in every conflict.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,117
Reppin
the ether
Most people aren't taking geography into account.

Cali has an ocean on one side that is almost impossible for anyone outside the west coast to reach (and they'd probably buy Oregon and Washington's allegiance). Their other side is protected by a massive mountain range that's extremely difficult to cross. LA is surrounded by mountains and ocean, SD is between the ocean and a sea with mountains on both land sides, and you'd have to cross the freaking Sierra Nevada's to reach SF. Their populations and resources are the best protected in the country. They have massive military assets they could funnel out to attack through the north, south, or Mojave, but anyone attacking then would have to deal with a bottleneck in the mountain passes that would make their lines thinned out and easy to exploit with the high ground on either side.

Texas is the nearest real rival. Cali could attack Texas from the west via forces coming through Arizona, from the south via Mexico, from the north via Oregon, or from the Gulf via the Panama Canal. Texas would have no idea where to defend from. While Cali's only real vulnerability would be the coastline...except that Cali has more Navy bases than any other state so Texas wouldn't stand a chance there.
 

omnifax

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
3,809
Reputation
1,196
Daps
10,557
Reppin
Kalamazoo, MI #ADOS
You're minimizing how difficult those supply lines would be to create and maintain, especially for states without major ports. Even if you can get some oil from someone, you're not going to get as much as you want or in a timely matter. Resource availability and ease of supply lines are crucial in every conflict.

Eh, it's already been pointed out that the coastal states with ports would have the advantage when it comes to getting those supplies from other nations. To your point of getting how much you want we are talking about states not a whole nation. The scale is going to be much smaller vs a scenario where you have the entire United States trying to get resources from a single country.
 

Neuromancer

Live Wire Vodoo
Supporter
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
85,061
Reputation
17,854
Daps
206,155
Reppin
Villa Straylight.
Texas goes first. They're the biggest threat and thus alliances will be formed to destroy it. CA is next. Sorry costal cousins. Ya'll have too much fire power. I think after that either NY or FL make a move for the bread basket.
Also do you know how much internal strife would be caused by this war? War is a good way to dispose of people and make it seem like the were KIA. I think that would be PA, GA, and VA's main problem. The winner would probably be a region and not a single state.
 

1thouwow

Poster of the Year
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
26,343
Reputation
-200
Daps
72,880
Jersey closes the bridges/tunnels, gets reinforcements from Puerto Rico, and splinters into a separate country


Food-We are the Garden State

Commerce-Ports facing the Atlantic, & a major international airport


Defense-Army,Navy, AirForce, Navy, and Coast Guard bases
(+ Jersey goons reinforced with Puerto Rock goons)

NJ would hold their own before deciding who to align with
FOH :mjlol:
 
Top