While everyone is shocked about Koonye, the most powerful man in rap is throwing up WS signs

[ZEB WALTON]

Like the yolk of an egg. They're practicing ethnic exclusivity.
Used to be more common among other whites.

Oh yea my man says theyre the worst but they kinda orthodox and hes americanizwd. Gotta keep everything in house. He complains about that shyt to me all the time cuz all his family getting stakes in all local businesses except him cuz of shyt his mom n dad did. Its ridic.

I mean i assume powerful jews work with powerful anglos that makes sense but im out the loop. All i know is when someone drops a ben shapiro vid i watch it and apparently hes the the subject of 40% of anti semitism on innanets by alt right yet coli keeps callin him an alt right cac. I think people just call anything right leaning alt right today. Thsi conversation is spread over 6 diff threads sorry if im confusing.

 

[Koichos]

No, they are from Southern Russia.

Ashkenazim are genetically closer to Palestinians than to Russians.

Fst Genetic Distance: (Tian et al., 2009)
AJ to Palestinians: 0.0093
AJ to Russians: 0.0137



(Xue et al., 2017)

According to historical records, Ashkenazi Jews first appeared in North-Western Europe ≈1000 years ago (ya), then in Poland ≈700 ya. In later years, AJ have expanded rapidly and spread over most of the continent. Recent studies demonstrated that AJ are genetically distinct, with ancestry intermediate between Middle-Easterners (ME) and Europeans (EU) [1-3] (Figure 1). Based on sequence data, we recently estimated the EU and ME ancestry proportions to be roughly equal [4].

We refined our estimate by allowing multiple European sources and using simulations to match the proportion of chromosomes assigned to each geographic region. The results suggested that ≈75% of the EU ancestry in AJ is South-European (Figure 3), with the rest mostly East-European.

(Lencz et al., 2017)

A number of recent studies have shown that Ashkenazi individuals have genetic ancestry intermediate between European (EU) and Middle-Eastern (ME) sources [4–8], consistent with the long-held theory of a Levantine origin followed by partial assimilation in Europe. The estimated amount of accumulated EU gene flow varied across studies, with the most recent ones, employing genome-wide data, converging to a contribution of around 50% of the AJ ancestry. We observed that in simulations of admixed genomes, the Middle-Eastern regional source could have also been recovered by running the same localization pipeline. Applying that pipeline to the AJ genomes, we identified Levant as the most likely ME source: the proportions of chromosomes classified as Levantine was 51.6%, compared to 21.7% and 22.2% classified as Druze and Southern ME, respectively.

The major source of EU ancestry in AJ was found to be Southern Europe (≈60–80% of EU ancestry), with the rest being likely Eastern European.

(Carmi et al., 2014)

The Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population is a genetic isolate close to European and Middle Eastern groups, with genetic diversity patterns conducive to disease mapping. Modelling of ancient histories for AJ and European populations using their joint allele frequency spectrum determines AJ to be an even admixture of European and likely Middle Eastern origins. We date the split between the two ancestral populations to ≈12–25 Kyr, suggesting a predominantly Near Eastern source for the repopulation of Europe after the Last Glacial Maximum. Analysis of long shared segments, which are abundant in AJ, confirms a recent severe bottleneck and potential utility in future sequencing studies. The joint AJ–European allele frequency spectrum suggests that the AJ population is an even mix of European and Middle Eastern ancestral populations and quantifies ancient bottlenecks and population splits.

(Behar et al., 2013)

The genetic perspective on Ashkenazi Jewish origins has pointed to a complex and multilayered construction of the Ashkenazi community giving rise to its contemporary shape. Most major genome-wide population-genetic studies of Ashkenazi Jews have detected evidence that the population has elements of ancestry both from Europe and from the Middle East (Atzmon and others, 2010; Behar and others, 2010; Campbell and others, 2012; Kopelman and 8 others, 2009). Ashkenazi Jews have been placed intermediately between non-Jewish Europeans and non-Jewish Middle Easterners in a variety of analyses, including multidimensional scaling and principal components analyses, Bayesian clustering, and population trees.

(Bray et al., 2010)

To evaluate admixture in the AJ population, we investigated the similarity between AJ and HGDP populations using PCA as well as a population clustering algorithm (32). Both analyses show that AJ individuals cluster between Middle Eastern and European populations (Fig. 2 A and B and Fig. S2A), corroborating other recent reports (13, 20, 22, 23, 25). Taken as a whole, our results, along with those from previous studies, support the model of a Middle Eastern origin of the AJ population followed by subsequent admixture with host Europeans or populations more similar to Europeans.

(Behar et al., 2010)

To glean further details of Levantine genetic structure, we repeated PCA on a restricted set of samples from west Eurasia (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 2) and by inspecting lower-ranked PCs in the Old World context (Supplementary Fig. 2b, c; PC1 versus PC3 and PC4). These analyses reveal three distinct Near Eastern Jewish subclusters: the first group is located between Middle Eastern and European populations and consists of Ashkenazi, Moroccan and Sephardi Jews. Comparison between the ADMIXTURE derived component patterns for Sephardi and Ashkenazi Jews shows that the former have only slightly greater similarity to the pattern observed for Middle Eastern populations than do the latter.

(Kopelman et al., 2009)

We find that the Jewish populations cluster together in several analyses, separately from the remaining populations. In addition, we find that the genetic ancestry of the Jewish populations is intermediate such that in several types of analysis of population structure, the Jewish populations are placed centrally, between the Middle Eastern populations and the European populations. These results are compatible with an ancient Middle Eastern origin for Jewish populations, together with gene flow from European and other groups in the Jewish diaspora.

(Seldin et al., 2006)

Using a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel, we observed population structure in a diverse group of Europeans and European Americans. Under a variety of conditions and tests, there is a consistent and reproducible distinction between ‘‘northern’’ and ‘‘southern’’ European population groups: most individual participants with southern European ancestry (Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Greek) have >85% membership in the ‘‘southern’’ population; and most northern, western, eastern, and central Europeans have >90% in the ‘‘northern’’ population group. Ashkenazi Jewish as well as Sephardic Jewish origin also showed >85% membership in the ‘‘southern’’ population, consistent with a later Mediterranean origin of these ethnic groups.

A kingdom once known as Khazaria.

The Khazar theory has been refuted by more than twenty geneticists.


(Behar et al., 2013)

Population-genetic structure and Ashkenazi Jews

Our sample set representing the geographic region of the Khazar Khaganate can be split into three subsets (Figure 1): populations from the South Caucasus region (Abkhasian, Armenian, Azeri, Georgian), populations from the North Caucasus region (Adygei, Balkar, Chechen, Kabardin, Kumyk, Lezgin, Nogai, North Ossetian, Tabasaran), and populations from the Volga region in the most northerly reaches of the Khazar expanse (Chuvash, Tatar). Under the hypothesis of a strong Khazar contribution to the Ashkenazi Jewish population, we might have expected in PCA (Figure 2a) to see the Ashkenazi Jews placed in tight overlap with populations representing the Khazar region. Instead, considering the samples of the Khazar region together with the Ashkenazi Jewish samples, the Ashkenazi Jews were positioned alongside other Jewish samples, between Southern Europeans and samples from the Middle East, and they did not substantially overlap populations from the Khazar region. The three subsets of the Khazar region —South Caucasus, North Caucasus, and Volga region—are themselves differentiated in PCA, with the Volga and North Caucasus populations, which approximate the Khazar region more closely than do the South Caucasus populations, positioned most distantly from Ashkenazi Jews.

The spatial ancestry analysis confirms and sharpens the lack of evidence for the Khazar hypothesis observed in PCA, placing the Ashkenazi Jewish sample in close proximity to Italian Jews, North African Jews, Sephardi Jews, and Mediterranean non-Jewish populations such as Cypriots and Italians. Of the three sub-regions of the Khazar Khaganate, the two northern groups are again distant from the Ashkenazi Jews. Among the four South Caucasus populations, the Armenian and Azeri populations in particular lie closer to non-Jewish Middle Eastern populations, including Druze, Iranians, Kurds, and Lebanese, than to Ashkenazi Jews. Strikingly, the Ashkenazi Jewish population shows no overlap even with the South Caucasus groups, and moreover, it is apparent that the South Caucasus Armenian population is genetically closer to Middle Eastern Jewish populations than to Ashkenazi Jews.

For the Jewish populations included in a large group containing Ashkenazi, North African, and Sephardi Jews, most of the populations with the highest similarity of cluster membership coefficients are other Jewish populations. Considering ten Jewish populations included in the group (Algerian, Belmonte, Bulgarian, Eastern Ashkenazi, Italian, Libyan, Moroccan, Tunisian, Turkish, Western Ashkenazi), the non-Jewish populations that appear on lists of populations with the most similar cluster memberships are French Basques, Bulgarians, Cypriots, Druze, Greeks, Italians from Abruzzo, Bergamo, Sicily, and Tuscany, Jordanians, Lebanese, Palestinians, Samaritans, Italians from Sardinia, Spanish, and Syrians. Notably absent from this list is the inclusion of any of the populations from the Khazar region.

In summary, in this most comprehensive study to date, we have examined the three potential sources for contemporary Ashkenazi Jews, using a new sample set that covers the full extent of the Khazar realm of the 6th to 10th centuries. Analysis of this large data set does not change and in fact reinforces the conclusions of multiple past studies, including ours and those of other groups (Atzmon and others, 2010; Bauchet and others, 2007; Behar and others, 2010; Campbell and others, 2012; Guha and others, 2012; Haber and others, 2013; Henn and others, 2012; Kopelman and others, 2009; Seldin and others, 2006; Tian and others, 2008). We confirm the notion that the Ashkenazi, North African, and Sephardi Jews share substantial genetic ancestry and that they derive it from Middle Eastern and European populations, with no indication of a detectable Khazar contribution to their genetic origins.

(Rootsi et al., 2013)

The long residence of Ashkenazi Jews in Eastern Europe and the high frequency of haplogroup R1a in the same region suggested that the founder might be of non-Jewish European ancestry, whose descendants were able to assume Levite status. However, because of the paucity of distinctive internal substructure of haplogroup R1a, it was not possible to suggest a particular European source population nor to test the hypothesis of a Turkic-speaking Khazar ancestor, which has been proposed in light of the narrative that members of the Khazar ruling class may have converted to Judaism in the 8th or 9th century.

(Behar et al., 2017)

The R1a-Y2619 Ashkenazi Levite cluster does not have origins in Khazaria. Not only did that line have origins in the Middle East as of 3,000 years ago, but the line was Jewish (and Levite) as of 1,750 years ago, more than 500 years before the Khazars (or, in some accounts, Khazarian royalty) are said to have converted to Judaism.

 

[IAMDetroit]

No, I'm telling you your new beliefs are a scam and you don't have the cheat code. It's fake and came from stupid cacs who can't read law correctly.

Again. Making maaaaaad assumptions. I think your projecting. Cheat codes didnt work out for you?

Quick questions and please don’t take this the wrong way. Are you sovereign and if so how has it improved your life financially, etc.? Are you self employed? Do you pay taxes? Do you receive benefits without an SSN? Do you insure yourself?

On topic, the hand signal was the first thing I noticed in that pic.

No. The term 'Sovereign Citizen' is an oxymoron. One cannot be a citizen and be sovereign at the same time. Also them nikkas is krazy racist.

Although they believe in some facts they also hold some alex jones like views.
But freedom can be attained.

Why wouldnt you want to treat your affairs like a business. Property and electricity and equity in the name of a trust.
These are not cheat codes.
Becoming a secured creditor instead of a debt slave should intrigue you.
This is information and lifestyle decisions those with wealth dont share.

Just research. Facts are facts. I know of no cheat codes but i do know life isnt a game.

Traffic tickets should be challenged because one cannot have a civil case and a criminal case in one. Challenge that shyt immediately.
If its civil then who is the injured party?
If we cant figure that out then we cannot eben begin to establish if the court even has jurisdictiinal authority to proceed.

 

[Harry B]

Are you sure that his old ass isn’t just throwing up the sign for what it means to normal people. That something is nice, most likely Kanye or his music?



If some nazis start throwing up the peace sign, would that mean that anyone throwing up peace is a nazi

 

[Axum Ezana]

I dont care about jews vs WS.

Like neither one gives a fukk about Africans except if they can profit off there back.

Is it just a rumor that Jews was behind the slave trade?