No they aren't. You know what the american public sees with associated with trump, 24/7, every day? Angry, racist white people, who even get aggressive and violent if there is a minority at a Trump rally. That's the public perception that Trump intentionally creates and promotes. To say a persons reaction to Trumps hideous stain of an embarrassment of a campaign is the same as their reaction to Obamas is obtuse as hell. Go sit in a corner and think about what you said.
Yes they are.
Trump has the right and his people have the right to be as angry and racist as they want.
What no one has the right to do to Trump and his followers is violate their legal rights, period.
The same way it was wrong for people to throw bricks at the DNC office when Obama was elected, deface others property that had obama stickers, the same with this situation.
At the end of the day, you have to mature enough to the point when you realize that you have to treat others with respect, even if you disagree with them, you respect their property, you respect their person, and you move on. When you start playing the game that you are going to use violence and terror to force these folks to act right, you have lost all moral high ground in your argument, and you actually lost the war, because to be honest there are way more non-blacks in this country than blacks, and if you want a violence and terror competition we lost, we don't have the manpower to compete.
I disagree. Hate speech which denigrates oppressed minorities shouldn't be a right and isnt in most of the world. I think it's right and justifiable the football players destroy the cacs' property as punishment. As for the players losing their scholarship, we'll see but I have always advocated guerilla fighting against cacs so as to not get caught.
You can disagree all you want, there was no hate speech on that wall and I'm pretty sure the frat themselves went over what was acceptable to put on the wall before they put it up.
On top of that the general idea or hate speech should be looked at with question by anyone with sense, who decides what is hate speech, it isn't objective and therefore its subject to being used by those in power to quash dissenting opinions, its a power that the government simply should never have.
There is no right for those players to destroy anything that doesn't belong tto them, period. Just like it isn't right for whites to destroy speech and property of those who they politically dislike and that doesn't belong to them.
You have to stop thinking on emotion and trying to justify action on the context of how it makes you feel. That is where you fall into playing checkers while the world around you is playing chess.
these young men for publicly hoeing these bytch made clowns
