lol. Absurdity of this argument. There are no apples to apples comparison other than they both being white
First you said both men were separatist, I pointed out that quality is not unique to hitler.
Let me pull back away from word police. It's a core part of his campaign where he blames Mexicans for much of this country's problems.So now you talmbowt hitler blaming a group for all of the problems of Germany, after I gave factual context for Trump's reference to Muslims and Mexicans, which doesn't blame them for all of the US problems.
He also mentioned China and Russia too, so that means he's anti Chinese and Russian too, so he's trying to be a global dictator?
You talmbowt a climb in power by a business man, that will completely restructure the type of government the US has?
You say all of this while ignoring the existence of the constitution, the current structure of the US government, and the checks/balances purposely ingrained within the government at both the federal and local levels, but you're not being intellectually dishonest?
oh shyt, the cherry picking of points to argue has started. lolSo because it isn't unique to Hitler means it's not similar?
You DIDNT DISPROVE MY POINT about the SIMILARITIES.
Let me pull back away from word police. It's a core part of his campaign where he blames Mexicans for much of this country's problems.
Already answered and no different than Hitler pointing out other nations for Geemnay's troubles while his main platform wa Sri blame Jews...much like Trump main platform is to blame Mexicans.
NO! I talked about Trumps rise to complete party backing in response to you bringing up Hitler AFTER he gained it. I compared Hitlers climb TO that power being similar to Trumps rise TO that power. The methods to get there. The similarities. YOU compared Hitler after he got that political power to where Teump is now trying to gain it.
DISJOINTED and DISHONEST AGAIN. Orange to apples.
This doesn't have shyt to do with my point.![]()
oh shyt, the cherry picking of points to argue has started. lol
If it's not unique to hitler, then he cannot represent it solely.
You asked anyone, what's the first thought that comes to mind when you say hitler, it would not be a "separatist". It would be burning of white jews in ovens and concentration camps.
but yet you are purposely ignoring them to pander to media propaganda, white jewish narrative, and now clearly to argue just to argue.
Post a link where he blames Mexicans for the country's entire problems
You did not answer nothing bruh. Trump is not the only American and non-American that talks about the problems of Russia and China's impact on the global economy
lol. Finally something I agree with you on. You're absolutely correct, your point doesn't have shyt to do with the constitution, current government structure, and checks/balances. So you're just talking hypothetical and promoting red herrings
The mere fact that you trying to force an argument talmbowt a possible rise by Trump to dictator status, only proves your desperation to portray yourself as having a well thoughtful reason behind your comparison vs being a democratic sheep and media propaganda victim
More cherry picking huh?That's a trash assesment. Because other figures may have done similar means one can't say those simalirites exist?
I don't give a fukk about some "ask anyone" poll you created. You are talking to ME. I'm speaking on points in time in Hitler's rise. You CONTINUE your end result of his power retorts refusing to address the things he did to get their, now hiding behind "a-a-ask anyone!" fukk asking someone uneducated on Hilters rise. I'm EDUCATED on it.
[quot] I disprove your argument by mentioning how other folks had similar qualities, [/quot]
fukk others!!
So instead of disproving my points on Hitlers rise being similar to Trump, ignoring how Much of his 25 point plan mirrors Trumps, now I'm repeating the media propaganda!
The media doesn't say shyt I'm saying in here. Now you want to diagnose me as tainted tart than deconstructing what I'm saying.
"Others did the same, so you can't use Hitler"
**ignores post of 25 point plan by Hilter and its similarities to Trump plans**
**creates an "everybody would say" poll as if everyone is educated on Hiltlers rise to power as much as they are to what he did when IN power**
**diagnoses me as a media propagandist**
Brother P-Touch
I correctly move on from "entire country's problems" and restate that his blaming Mexicans for many of the country's problems is a primary part of his platform. You ignore and ask his question AGAIN.
What does that have to do with the other things he more often talks about? Putting kids in refugee camps. Ever read his platform?
It's obvious that you yourself aren't:
1. Educated on Hitlers rise to power
You having to hide behind a "ask everybody" defense as if the rise to Hitlers power is common knowledge is DISHONEST and a mask to cover the shyt you don't know about Hitler your damn self.
2. Comparing 1941 already in power hitler to say he's not like Trump to counter my point about Trump current stage being similar to Hitler rise in the late 20s and 30s.
Another ruse of a fukking response. An apple to orange comparison....and an intentional one.
3. Your constant need to act as if Trump addressing other things obscures the primary vehicle he uses to gain support.
Clearly his focus on the "otherness" of others is the main focus of his campaign. His foreign policy is a joke and his sprinkled talks about Russia and China does NOT represent the fuel behind the Trump mobile. That fuel is anti immigrant, xenophobic and racism. A sprinkling of talk on Russia (he likes Putin....remember?) and China doesn't speak to his base. Racial hatered does.
fukk outta here with this cheap trick of irrelevant talk. The discussion was never about constitutional misbehavior or a misuse of government. YOU decided to turn it into that in order to talk on things and take up irrelevant space to think yoiure making a point. That Point makes nine.
This isn't forced. Look at his platform. Do a study on Hitlers rise to power platform. It's obvious you're not read up on it at ALL and will likely have to google your way to talk about 27 to 33 Hitler.
Catch up to me playboy. Hiding behind "most people hear Hiltler and think" is wack juice. Ask a niqqa who actually read up on Hitler
bu bu he's anti immigration and anti muslims. smhCot damn, you're reaching with these similarities and now doubling down, while talmbowt intellectual dishonesty. lol
Hitler had an entire political party's loyalty, with a separate enforcement squad for that party. Trump is battling the entire democratic party and his own party for the nomination. The average white person in the US, US presidents, business owners, police officials, teachers, strippers, porn stars, hispanics, and asians have had separatist views towards black folks. To use the term hitler to describe certain characteristics that are not unique to him is to pander to the jewish community and the false narrative that the holocaust is the worst act committed by humans on humans
Trump mentioned efforts to tackle illegal immigration, not legal immigration. If you speak to any member of the UN about illegal immigration, they will not have a positive view because of the innate issues it causes
Trump mentioned muslims from troubled countries should be banned before background check are done on them. Which makes sense to me and the US government cause a few months beforeTrump mention that, the house passed legislation that limits travels without visas from those troubled countries that Trump was referencing
Those of us who are intellectually lazy, sheeps for either political party, and/or unaware of our susceptibility to media conditioning, believed in the sensationalized narrative that Trump wanted to ban all muslims and was against immigration and immigrants
INCREDIBLE!!!
"No one needs to know about Hitler" is you justifying your ignorance on him because I know more about it than you....period.More cherry picking huh?
Trump is not a separatist. Hitler was a separatist. Other figures were/are separatist. You ignore them to use hitler as the definition of what it means to be a separatist cause the media made you feel embolden. If you used any unique actions and/or characteristics of hitler like mentioning brown shirts, concentration camps, burning ovens etc, you would still be wrong to compare, but at least you would be using the term hitler in proper context
Yes, I'm talking to you. A person that admits he's not factoring in the current government structure, its constitution, and the checks and balances of each level of government, but still feel comfortable to talk in hypothetical about the the "rise" to dictatorship and use red herrings as arguments. You sounding crazy bruh
You could recite the 25/30/500 points of the Nazi party, while standing on your head, drinking water, that don't mean you are making any sense to compare Trump to Hitler. You have not been able to provide any information that has Trump blaming Muslims and Mexicans for the problems in the US, but yet you mentioned Hitler blamed others for the problems of Germany
Your need to backtrack to replace the word ALL with MANY should indicate to you how weak your argument is and how much it lacks in-depth analysis. There are innate problems that occur with illegal immigration, regardless of country and who is breaking the law. If you don't know that, then you have no reason to be in such discussions, so fall back
Nobody needs to know anything about Hitler to prove your ridiculous comparisons that you're trying to pretend to be your own. Keep googling about Hitler nikka, that won't prove you right. Again, the only context of Muslims and Mexicans by Trump is...
bu bu he's anti immigration and anti muslims. smh
smh. Blatant attempt to switch the discussion to focus on who knows more about hitler cause of your failed attempts at comparing the two"No one needs to know about Hitler" is you justifying your ignorance on him because I know more about it than you....period.
I'm in a position to speak because I do know. But here's the smart dumb niqqa saying "I don't have to know."
![]()
Knowledge of Hitler is necessary for comparing the 2. He possesses it, you don't. He won the argument, nikka. Take your L and KIMsmh. Blatant attempt to switch the discussion to focus on who knows more about hitler cause of your failed attempts at comparing the two
Switch?smh. Blatant attempt to switch the discussion to focus on who knows more about hitler cause of your failed attempts at comparing the two
lol. Pretend to be following the discussion, but use his claims to know more about hitler as the reason to prove he won brehsKnowledge of Hitler is necessary for comparing the 2. He possesses it, you don't. He won the argument, nikka. Take your L and KIM
deflection attempt failureSwitch?
You: "I don't need to know about Hitler"
You: "others did the same"
Me: "how would you know that if you don't know about Hitler?"
You:**posts gibberish**
![]()