White people scared of war with China

Thethirdpew

Banned
Joined
Jan 9, 2016
Messages
1,320
Reputation
-825
Daps
3,262
I remember how in 2008 people were saying that China would remain as one big sweatshop :russ:. Now you got people out here panicking about possible war with China because they are too powerful :francis:. I just got out of the military and the amount of times I heard "China is a problem" would surprise you. Cacs really got that fear in their eyes and I notice more and more anti Asian sentiments among middle class/poor whites.



I plan on moving to the Carribeans in the next 10 years. I'm getting my degree and peacing out :yeshrug:
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,160
Daps
56,251
I remember how in 2008 people were saying that China would remain as one big sweatshop :russ:. Now you got people out here panicking about possible war with China because they are too powerful :francis:. I just got out of the military and the amount of times I heard "China is a problem" would surprise you. Cacs really got that fear in their eyes and I notice more and more anti Asian sentiments among middle class/poor whites.



I plan on moving to the Carribeans in the next 10 years. I'm getting my degree and peacing out :yeshrug:
Holla at me when China hasn’t military bases in the west like America has all over Asia and Europe. Holla when china is allied with western countries like America is with Asian countries. Holla when china can run military exercises in Noeth America like America does in Asia. US sends signal to China with aircraft carrier's Asia tour- Nikkei Asian Review

Things like that wouldn’t be happening if America was “scared” of china.
 

Koba St

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
22,415
Reputation
6,025
Daps
156,435
China can't even build infrastructure that doesn't collapse. Sink holes everywhere, buildings falling if that's how they build weapons too I wouldn't worry.
Yeah keep telling yourself that. :mjlol:

The greatest civilisation the world has known back to reclaim its top spot and nothing you filthy cacs can do about it. :umad:
 

UncleTomFord15

Veteran
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
18,287
Reputation
581
Daps
140,491
Chinese will be to the world what white people are to the world in the next 100 to 200 years.
















Blacks will still be at the bottom:francis::snoop:
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
42,177
Reputation
19,268
Daps
156,409
Reppin
Humanity
nikka everyone scared of a war with china. If they do fight it is the end of humanity:merchant:. This isnt ancient times or even early 20th century, a couple of nukes will make us all extinct.

what you said made me wonder how many modern hydrogen bombs it would take to actually kill everyone on earth directly or indirectly.
so, i looked some shyt up:

To kill humanity directly, one for every city or so, plus more to handle the agricultural population not in the cities. To kill humanity indirectly, not more than five hydrogen bombs dropped around the world on the same day; the ash and nuclear toxicity would a. block out the sun for weeks, killing many crops and b. poison the food supply and population that remained, resulting in a crisis that would be very difficult to curb. This is based on the fact that the two atomic bombs dropped on Japan (over a week apart) were enough to block out the sun for days and left a toxic residue that was costly and time-consuming to recover from, and the sheer power of a hydrogen bomb (atomic bomb with a large volume of hydrogen within the bomb) compared to a regular atom bomb would magnify the effects.

Hydrogen bombs, or thermonuclear bombs, are more powerful than atomic or "fission" bombs. The difference between thermonuclear bombs and fission bombs begins at the atomic level. [The 10 Greatest Explosions Ever]

Fission bombs, like those used to devastate the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima during World War II, work by splitting the nucleus of an atom. When the neutrons, or neutral particles, of the atom's nucleus split, some hit the nuclei of nearby atoms, splitting them, too. The result is a very explosive chain reaction. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki exploded with the yield of 15 kilotons and 20 kilotons of TNT, respectively, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists.

In contrast, the first test of a thermonuclear weapon, or hydrogen bomb, in the United States in November 1952 yielded an explosion on the order of 10,000 kilotons of TNT. Thermonuclear bombs start with the same fission reaction that powers atomic bombs — but the majority of the uranium or plutonium in atomic bombs actually goes unused. In a thermonuclear bomb, an additional step means that more of the bomb's explosive power becomes available.

First, an igniting explosion compresses a sphere of plutonium-239, the material that will then undergo fission. Inside this pit of plutonium-239 is a chamber of hydrogen gas. The high temperatures and pressures created by the plutonium-239 fission cause the hydrogen atoms to fuse. This fusion process releases neutrons, which feed back into the plutonium-239, splitting more atoms and boosting the fission chain reaction.



Shiieeet, them chinese were hardbody back when I served in the 90s.

please share your experiences that make you believe this.
i'm of a mixed opinion about china in general.
 

NoGutsNoGLory

Superstar
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
6,653
Reputation
566
Daps
27,621
what you said made me wonder how many modern hydrogen bombs it would take to actually kill everyone on earth directly or indirectly.
so, i looked some shyt up:









please share your experiences that make you believe this.
i'm of a mixed opinion about china in general.
That few?:lupe: damn breh wtf? I thought maybe a couple hundred but just 5? Thats insane. Why the fukk does America have like 10,000 then?
 

intruder

SOHH Class of 2003 and CASUAL sports fan
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
30,481
Reputation
4,525
Daps
58,211
Reppin
Love
China alone wouldnt fight the U.S. for all the reasons stated in the video. Nor does the U.S. want that fight either. U.S. would eventually win but the cost may be too much to bare.

HOWEVER, Remember that China and Russia are very good partners when it comes to trading weapons. China has bought weapons (fighter Jets, Bombers, etc) from the Russians for decads and built its own fighters based on Russian technology and even copies some (See Chinese K15 and Russian SU33)

Chinese J-15 based on Russian Su-33 design
chinese-j15-2011.jpg
Russian SU-33 (Naval derivative of Su-27 Flanker)
sukhoi_su_33-68894.jpg

Add the fact that as of 10 days ago they confirmed the purchase of more SU-35's (4G++ derivative of SU-27) from Russia tells you that the two are still in good terms in terms of military trade.
China's Air Force May Soon Get More Russian Su-35 Fighters
For those who dont know what that means: The Su-35 is the upgraded variant of the SU-27. The SU-27 became known as the best fighter in the world back in the 80s and 90 due to it's maneuverability and is the reason the U.S. revamped modern fighter designs going stealth thus the development of the F-22 which they could not afford to make more after buying 180 of them due to the super high price-tag.

And what's the common denominator: Both are super powers that are at odds with the U.S.. Factor in that several countries now distrust the U.S. over spying allegations (See Brazil, Turkey, etc) the U.S. is losing some of its trusted partners over time UNLESS they renew these alliances

But when it's all said and done China does not want nor is it ready for that fight because it doesnt hve the weaponry to win. Russia does not want that fight because it doesnt have the $$$ to keep it up for long. . All they can do in spread their influence on their corner of the world.
 
Last edited:

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
42,177
Reputation
19,268
Daps
156,409
Reppin
Humanity
That few?:lupe: damn breh wtf? I thought maybe a couple hundred but just 5? Thats insane. Why the fukk does America have like 10,000 then?


because when you have the ability make that many you start getting all :mjgrin:sprinkled with a bit of:steviej:

every one looking at the US like:
world: "yo, you got it...um what are you doing" :wtf:

US: "i know but chill, we gonna make moooooooore" :banderas:

world: "my man, do you really need 68,000 warheads? can we talk about this?" :skip:

US: "we gonna nuke the moon!"
full




Project A119, also known as A Study of Lunar Research Flights, was a top-secret plan developed in 1958 by the United States Air Force. The aim of the project was to detonate a nuclear bomb on the Moon which would help in answering some of the mysteries in planetary astronomy and astrogeology. If the explosive device detonated on the surface, not in a lunar crater, the flash of explosive light would have been faintly visible to people on earth with their naked eye, a show of force resulting in a possible boosting of domestic morale in the capabilities of the United States, a boost that was needed after the Soviet Union took an early lead in the Space Race and was also working on a similar project.

The project was never carried out, being cancelled primarily out of a fear of a negative public reaction, with the potential militarization of space that it would also have signified, and because a moon landing would undoubtedly be a more popular achievement in the eyes of the American and international public alike. A similar project by the Soviet Union also never came to fruition.

The existence of the US project was revealed in 2000 by a former executive at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Leonard Reiffel, who led the project in 1958. A young Carl Sagan was part of the team responsible for predicting the effects of a nuclear explosion in vacuum and low gravity and in evaluating the scientific value of the project. The project documents remained secret for nearly 45 years, and despite Reiffel's revelations, the United States government has never officially recognized its involvement in the study.

Project A119 - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Top