@all the "i don't think people know how great barkley was" comments
people realize how great chuck was. lebron's just better
No doubt Lebron is better....But people don't know how great Chuck was and that's real talk.

lol @ Barkley being 6'4", dude loses an inch every year
literally everyone in this thread is singing barkley's praises and a couple crack babies are even picking chuck over bron but:
no, breh. that's ignoring reality talk.

That's with sneakers
-How tall is Jordan again?-
![]()
![]()
![]()
I love how yall use pictures to justify your point when clearly pics can't be unreliable. Let's just use some common sense here. This whole thing started because Barkley gets extra props for playing the 4 spot undersized. Why yall want to discredit that, I have know idea.
Jordan is listed as 6'6. But he's 6'5 in real life. I've partied with that cat several times at the French Quarter when he was in Bham.
I've partied with Chuck and met him countless times...
Whether Chuck is 6'4 or 6'5 doesn't matter. He was an undersized power forwared playing at an elite level against his obviously taller counterparts...Yall new nikkas try to hard man..
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/sports/basketball/22score.html?_r=0
http://www.celebheights.com/s/Charles-Barkley-2722.html
I read your post wrong brah my bad, but my point still stands
Did you NOT post this in Post #67 of this thread?:
I then proceed to show you that your statement was false......and you post a Drake smiley like I'm wrong?
![]()

No doubt Lebron is better....But people don't know how great Chuck was and that's real talk.
So one play proves you can't guard point guards? And 37 year ''old'' Tim Duncan was putting up 18 and 10 in the playoffs.
This site would be a lot better if fakkits like you didn't exist.
You think i give a shyt that he averaged 18 and 10? No cause i actually watch these games unlike you stat whores who can even link a decent argument together. 