Why are libertarians so anxious to be racist?

Baka's Weird Case

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2015
Messages
16,943
Reputation
8,223
Daps
83,557
Reppin
Goon Squad - Catset
I don't much about libertarians but I do see some exhibiting that behavior on FB. I had to cut some dude I know off because some of the shyt he was saying. Why do they hate the civil rights act?

THey can basically use libertarian shyt to excuse opposing any anti-discrimination legislation with any anti-government argument.

like if were gonna say that restaurants cant refuse service to somebody because of their race, they can just say it should be "that businesses choice"

maybe theyll even mix some argument in like

"oh but then people should not buy from them for being racist :yeshrug: let the free market ruin em:troll:"

if youre wondering why they specifically hate civil rights legislation as opposed to similar stuff like drug legislation its because civil rights legislation is still unpopular with a huge segment of white people in this country. real easy way to build up support for them. basically they dont think people should be limited to not discriminate...even if those people have much more power over the people theyre discriminating on :jbhmm:
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,516
Reputation
4,669
Daps
89,807
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
I don't much about libertarians but I do see some exhibiting that behavior on FB. I had to cut some dude I know off because some of the shyt he was saying. Why do they hate the civil rights act?
The problematic aspects(for libertarians) of the Civil Rights Act come down to Title II and Title VII which outlaw discriminatory hiring and selling practices by private employers.

Such an egalitarian mandate, sounds wonderful from a social engineering perspective... and if your idea of what constitutes a just society is one where everyone treats all races and genders "equally", how better to accomplish such a utopia then literally forcing people to behave accordingly with threat of monetary penalties and imprisonment?

From a liberty perspective however, such a policy is a direct affront on basic property rights.:yeshrug:




 

I_Got_Da_Burna

Superstar
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
7,257
Reputation
1,000
Daps
28,812
Reppin
NULL
The problematic aspects(for libertarians) of the Civil Rights Act come down to Title II and Title VII which outlaw discriminatory hiring and selling practices by private employers.

Such an egalitarian mandate, sounds wonderful from a social engineering perspective... and if your idea of what constitutes a just society is one where everyone treats all races and genders "equally", how better to accomplish such a utopia then literally forcing people to behave accordingly with threat of monetary penalties and imprisonment?

From a liberty perspective however, such a policy is a direct affront on basic property rights.:yeshrug:




What you libertarians fail to realize is that there's no such thing as property rights. You, as a private citizen, don't own shyt in the United States. You rent land. Doesn't matter if you buy it in cash. You do not own it. You can't therefore take your little piece of land, call it liberatopia, and secede from the U.S. so to think you have rights to practice illegalities on your property under the guise of "property rights" is a fallacy. You cannot commit civil rights violations on your land, period. Maybe on your private island, but not in America. That's where your libertarianism fails.
 

NY's #1 Draft Pick

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,851
Reputation
6,680
Daps
100,790
Reppin
305
The problematic aspects(for libertarians) of the Civil Rights Act come down to Title II and Title VII which outlaw discriminatory hiring and selling practices by private employers.

Such an egalitarian mandate, sounds wonderful from a social engineering perspective... and if your idea of what constitutes a just society is one where everyone treats all races and genders "equally", how better to accomplish such a utopia then literally forcing people to behave accordingly with threat of monetary penalties and imprisonment?

From a liberty perspective however, such a policy is a direct affront on basic property rights.:yeshrug:



What are your thoughts on title ll and title Vll though?
 

Gains

PAAG Hunter
Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
11,131
Reputation
1,387
Daps
25,230
ron-paul-white-power.jpg
 

Althalucian

All Star
Joined
Nov 17, 2016
Messages
1,096
Reputation
310
Daps
4,889
You can't legislate it away completely but by making it illegal you can heavily reduce it's use.


No but it heavily reduced it's use.

Right...truth is no system is perfect because human beings are incredibly emotional creatures. Threat of law at least reduces our terrible impulses. It was either that or the civil rights movement maybe become violent and white government at the time was afraid of violent revolution and losing their moral standing in the world.
 
Top