Yes, I do.Because the Cowboys are the most bet on team by the public in the NFL.
And now that Romo is back and they won last week, odddmakers know that the public will flock to put money on Dallas again, like they always do.
So they make a line that will theoretically get 50% of the money on Carolina.
You do understand that lines are created and set based on public perception rather than reality, right?
Dallas, Green Bay, Pittsburg/New England. That's the order of most bet on NFL teams by the public.Yes, I do.
And how many times have the Patriots been the underdog in Vegas this year?
![]()
Because the Cowboys are the most bet on team by the public in the NFL.
And now that Romo is back and they won last week, odddmakers know that the public will flock to put money on Dallas again, like they always do.
So they make a line that will theoretically get 50% of the money on Carolina.
You do understand that lines are created and set based on public perception rather than reality, right?
Anyways, I see what this thread is. Obvious "lowkey" attempt at hyping Carolina some more and throwing shade at Dallas. Whether you agree with it or not, Dallas -1 is about right in terms of splitting the public money 50-50. It's thanksgiving. People are going to bet on Dallas in droves.
That's the point.Dallas, Green Bay, Pittsburg/New England. That's the order of most bet on NFL teams by the public.
So ask yourself again, what game exactly should NE have been underdogs so far on their schedule?
Your realize NE was only -10 or so to fukking Washington just a couple weeks ago, yes? We all knew they would win by 3 scores, but it was only 10 so that they could get some money on Washington.
It's really not that hard. :lolwtf:
Everybody knows Cowboys aren't a real 3-7. Don't understand why people pretending to be confused by this.
If it's such a crazy line...there's easy money to be made![]()