Why aren’t libertarians talking about Ferguson?

CHL

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
13,456
Reputation
1,480
Daps
19,582
Because libertarians are a bunch of hypocrites. And let's point out the elephant in the room, most of them are white guys with above average income (and just want satisfy their greed and lower taxes).
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,077
Reputation
6,048
Daps
132,806
This whole paleoconservative militia movement is all about trying to recreate antebellum southern America where the ******s were slaves, before the Jew-run mainstream media and banking system, and when cacs were free to run around shooting people.

That's why these dudes are supposedly so anti-government and they bytch all day about Ruby Ridge and Waco (both of which the people who were killed were breaking the law), but you will never hear a peep from them about Fred Hampton, Assata Shakur, or the countless incidents of police brutality and targeted murders and terrorism inflictedon blacks by the government. fukk em.

:manny:
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,400
Daps
32,646
Reppin
humans
I'm amazed no one said anything about this after the practical martial law implemented in Boston after the marathon bombing.

why do libertarians have to take the baton on this anyways?


Some of us here spoke about the martial law in Boston and got chastised by others who thought the police response and a tank with a machine gun rolling down the street ordering people to stay inside was justified.
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,436
Daps
26,227
Well cacs dont normally stand up for black issues. They stand up to stop the gov from fukking with their financial interest. The black libertarians are the only liberta who believe its about human and citizen rights, lol
 

anti_cracker

Banned
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
19
Reputation
0
Daps
19
http://reason.com/archives/2014/08/14/some-thoughts-on-ferguson-newark-state-v
.
By Sunday night, there were protests, followed by rioters, and the now standard set-piece, the militarized police. The same happened on Monday, and on Tuesday, and on Wednesday, when cops assaulted multiple journalists, arrested at least 16 people, including a St. Louis alderman covering the protests on Twitter, clashed with protesters, and generally acted pretty close to the way an occupying force might when faced by indigenous resistance. Were people shooting at cops? It didn't look like it. Protests were largely peaceful. The police were not. On Wednesday night, Missouri's Democrat governor, Jay Nixon released a statement "urging" law enforcement to respect the rights of residents in Ferguson. He excused police actions this week as in the interests of "protecting the public." The limp statement was excoriated by activists following events in Ferguson, Missouri, and rightly so. How could a governor merely urge? But could the governor order cops in Ferguson to stand down? Would he send in the National Guard instead?
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,400
Daps
32,646
Reppin
humans

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
92,363
Reputation
3,846
Daps
164,834
Reppin
Brooklyn
That is insane. He has full Marine Corps combat gear on. Even the MARPAT.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARPAT

Is there a jungle out there or something?

It really is crazy. It's so far beyond acceptable that it's hard to even try to begin to comprehend what we're seeing.

I hope things don't get any worse but maybe this will be the catalyst necessary to demilitarize


twitter quote: @PaulSzoldra LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device), the last place I saw one of those was at the Iraqi detention facility.
storify.com



That is dark.

I thought I heard one in the video I watched last night.
 
Top