Why aren’t libertarians talking about Ferguson?
- Thread starter Julius Skrrvin
- Start date
Dead7 you think it's a coincidence that some of the best economies in the world are countries like Norway, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands and Germany (and Iceland and Denmark, but they aren't quite at the very top economically like the other five)?
They must be so capitalist, have small government, no healthcare, low taxes, little regulation, no social programs right? Oh wait.....
They must be so capitalist, have small government, no healthcare, low taxes, little regulation, no social programs right? Oh wait.....
Carter G. Hoodson
Tarik is my name ✊✊✊
We all know why
Thats a conversation for a different thread.Dead7 you think it's a coincidence that some of the best economies in the world are countries like Norway, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands and Germany (and Iceland and Denmark, but they aren't quite at the very top economically like the other five)?
They must be so capitalist, have small government, no healthcare, low taxes, little regulation, no social programs right? Oh wait.....
I agree, this is starting to go off topic. My bad.
But just remember those countries next time you want to go on about how great libertarianism is in another thread...just saying...
In a weird way I understand, sort like other raging issues like immigration reform.....
I'm sure many people now believe something needs to be done after hearing and seeing various instances of abuse.....
And some cases the pure ignorance of the conservative politicans and some democrats only further fuels the flames, of enraged enlightened individuals who can't help but hop on board....
you know I'm not even going to....
How are you going to wait for evidence when the police department is trying to destroy evidence
c'mon @DEAD7 don't you suppose to be shouting
Government gon Government right
Cabbage Patch
The Media scene in V is for Vendetta is the clue
Because this situation is not just up their alley, it's what they warned about. Unless their warnings are only for whites and asians. It's easy to talk about hypotheticals; but when you're suddenly at a loss for words -- and actions! -- when the hypothetical becomes reality
Right. We just have to understand anti-black thought as being fundamental to the ideology, and not acting as mere components to it. This helps explain how libertarians are able to carry out the parallel processing of anti-federal leanings being central to their thinking because of "civil liberties", and yet show very little aversion to the historical abuses meted out by local law enforcement. Libertarians to me, just take a more passive aggressive approach with virulent anti-black attitudes.
With libertarians you'll hear softer offshoots of "northern/union aggression" type sentiment as it relates to the civil war, and desegregation, with this idea things should have worked somehow worked out naturally thru some invisible hand/market forces bullsht. Just a way to align and sympathize with southern male male thinking. Simply put, local law enforcement has a deserved historical reputation of suppressing the liberty of black people (even being inextricably connected with the KKK) so they're not a problem in their eyes, but the "federal govt" has a reputation as being way too black friendly, and "anti-white" which inspires their perpetual hostilities.
This helps us make sense of Rand Paul's earlier pro segregation rant a couple of years back. No, you're not pro-business freedoms, you're just anti black. He's tried to make amends by disowning those statements as if he's grown on the idea of race, but Im skeptical. His ant-drug law rants are encouraging, but his performance at that historically black college he spoke at under the auspices of "gop outreach" says to me all this is a cynical effort to attract black votes more than anything. He did the whole "republicans are the party of lincoln/democrats are the party of racism" con, rather than keeping it real and acknowledging that race is a problem with the right, and with his aim being to address those problems. He didnt take the true concerns of black people, and systemic racism, seriously, as to not violate the fundamental spirit of libertarianism and its racist base.
They have small homogenous populations with relatively little habitable land...and live around nations that supplement their need to be entirely autonomous.Dead7 you think it's a coincidence that some of the best economies in the world are countries like Norway, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands and Germany (and Iceland and Denmark, but they aren't quite at the very top economically like the other five)?
They must be so capitalist, have small government, no healthcare, low taxes, little regulation, no social programs right? Oh wait.....
Its really and truly not a legit comparison
Cabbage Patch
The Media scene in V is for Vendetta is the clue
because they just look at countries and say "oh look at what A is doing compared to B"
shyt is stupid sometimes.
The USA has 300 MILLION People. Thats like the 3rd most populous country
Once again liberals are full of shyt.
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/08/...it-for-consistency-on-law-enforcement-issues/
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/08/...it-for-consistency-on-law-enforcement-issues/